IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v20y2015i2p185-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dislocation and Uncertainty in East Manchester: The Legacy of the Commonwealth Games

Author

Listed:
  • Camilla Lewis

Abstract

In 2002, the Commonwealth Games were championed as a win-win solution for Manchester. The sporting event would bring worldwide attention and investment to the city and offer a unique opportunity to kick start social regeneration, transforming the fortunes of some of Manchester's poorest neighbourhoods. This paper explores experiences of urban change, from the perspective of long-standing residents in the neighbourhoods of Beswick and Openshaw, which lie in East Manchester. Despite promises of legacy, these localities remain dislocated from the rest of the city and the future continues to be defined by uncertainty by the area's residents. In order to understand some of the tensions and difficulties that arise in projects of urban transformation we need to pay attention to the practical ways in which people make relationships to place ( Massey 1995 , 2001 ) which tend to be erased in dominant narratives about ‘legacy’. It argues that we must go beyond drawing simple conclusions of the ‘positive’ or ‘negative’ implications of regeneration processes in order to investigate the social effects of urban change for local populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Camilla Lewis, 2015. "Dislocation and Uncertainty in East Manchester: The Legacy of the Commonwealth Games," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 20(2), pages 185-191, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:20:y:2015:i:2:p:185-191
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.3607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.3607
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.3607?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan Mace & Peter Hall & Nick Gallent, 2007. "New East Manchester: Urban Renaissance or Urban Opportunism?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 51-65, January.
    2. Stephen Quilley, 2000. "Manchester First: From Municipal Socialism to the Entrepreneurial City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 601-615, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steven Henderson, 2012. "An Evaluation of the Layering and Legacy of Area-based Regeneration Initiatives in England: The Case of Wolverhampton," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(6), pages 1201-1227, May.
    2. Mathew Johnson & Miguel Martínez Lucio & Stephen Mustchin & Damian Grimshaw & Jo Cartwright & Jenny K. Rodriguez & Tony Dundon, 2023. "City regions and decent work: Politics, pluralism and policy making in Greater Manchester," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(3), pages 504-522, May.
    3. Alan Murie & Rob Rowlands, 2008. "The New Politics of Urban Housing," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 26(3), pages 644-659, June.
    4. Ron Boschma & Carlo Gianelle, 2014. "Regional Branching and Smart Specialisation Policy," JRC Research Reports JRC88242, Joint Research Centre.
    5. Simon Guy & John Henneberry & Steven Rowley, 2002. "Development Cultures and Urban Regeneration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(7), pages 1181-1196, June.
    6. Alan Harding & Michael Harloe & James Rees, 2010. "Manchester's Bust Regime?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 981-991, December.
    7. Guy Julier, 2005. "Urban Designscapes and the Production of Aesthetic Consent," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(5-6), pages 869-887, May.
    8. Joaquim Rius Ulldemolins, 2014. "Culture and authenticity in urban regeneration processes: Place branding in central Barcelona," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(14), pages 3026-3045, November.
    9. Jan van der Borg & Antonio Russo, 2008. "Area Regeneration and Tourism Development. Evidence from Three European Cities," Working Papers 2008_21, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    10. Paul Jones & Stuart Wilks-Heeg, 2004. "Capitalising Culture: Liverpool 2008," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 19(4), pages 341-360, November.
    11. Iain Deas, 2014. "The search for territorial fixes in subnational governance: City-regions and the disputed emergence of post-political consensus in Manchester, England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(11), pages 2285-2314, August.
    12. Baptiste Antoniazza & André Mach & Michael Andrea Strebel, 2023. "THE URBAN LEFT IN POWER: Comparing the Profiles of ‘Municipal Socialists’ and the ‘New Urban Left’ in Swiss Cities," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5), pages 745-772, September.
    13. Gordon MacLeod, 2011. "Urban Politics Reconsidered," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(12), pages 2629-2660, September.
    14. Camilla Lewis, 2017. "Turning houses into homes: Living through urban regeneration in East Manchester," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(6), pages 1324-1340, June.
    15. Andrew Smith & Tim Fox, 2007. "From 'Event-led' to 'Event-themed' Regeneration: The 2002 Commonwealth Games Legacy Programme," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(5-6), pages 1125-1143, May.
    16. Cheung, Chau-kiu & Ngai, Ngan-pun, 2010. "Training to raise unemployed youth's work commitment in Tianjin," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 298-305, February.
    17. Nessa Winston, 2015. "Multifamily Housing and Resident Life Satisfaction: Evidence from the European Social Survey," Working Papers 201515, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:20:y:2015:i:2:p:185-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.