IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v16y2011i1p137-148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emotional Reflexivity in Contemporary Friendships: Understanding it Using Elias and Facebook Etiquette

Author

Listed:
  • Mary Holmes

Abstract

The popular social networking site Facebook has become a part of millions of people's everyday lives. In order to help people navigate the friendships they form and maintain on Facebook there are many websites offering advice about etiquette. This advice, and responses to it, can help reveal how contemporary emotional expression is organised, especially as it relates to friendship. This paper critically adapts the approach of other sociologists such as Norbert Elias, and Cas Wouters who have used etiquette and advice books to explore social changes in emotionality. Using online advice about Facebook etiquette, it is argued that there is uncertainty about the degree of emotional closeness appropriate for friendships in contemporary life, especially where there are status differences. It is difficult to know how to feel and how to behave within the relational complexity of contemporary life. In particular, expanded definitions of friendship form part of this complexity which promotes and requires an ‘emotionalisation of reflexivity’.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Holmes, 2011. "Emotional Reflexivity in Contemporary Friendships: Understanding it Using Elias and Facebook Etiquette," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(1), pages 137-148, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:16:y:2011:i:1:p:137-148
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.2292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.2292
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.2292?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee Sproull & Sara Kiesler, 1986. "Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(11), pages 1492-1512, November.
    2. Shelley Budgeon, 2006. "Friendship and Formations of Sociality in Late Modernity: The Challenge of ‘Post Traditional Intimacy’," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 11(3), pages 48-58, September.
    3. Liz Stanley & Sue Wise, 2006. "Putting it into Practice[1]: Using Feminist Fractured Foundationalism in Researching Children in the Concentration Camps of the South African War[2]," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 11(1), pages 14-50, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Graham Allan, 2011. "Commentary: Friendships and Emotions," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(1), pages 95-99, February.
    2. Nur Hafeeza Ahmad Pazil, 2018. "Face, Voice and Intimacy in Long-Distance Close Friendships," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 8(11), pages 938-947, November.
    3. Olson, Rebecca E. & Smith, Alexandra & Good, Phillip & Neate, Emily & Hughes, Cody & Hardy, Janet, 2021. "Emotionally reflexive labour in end-of-life communication," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nault, Kelly A. & Sezer, Ovul & Klein, Nadav, 2023. "It’s the journey, not just the destination: Conveying interpersonal warmth in written introductions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    2. Verónica Policarpo, 2017. "Friendship, Gender and Sexual Experience: Retrospective Narratives about the Formation of a Sexual Self during Youth," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(2), pages 118-129, May.
    3. Jennifer D. Parlamis & Ingmar Geiger, 2015. "Mind the Medium: A Qualitative Analysis of Email Negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 359-381, March.
    4. Natalia Levina & Manuel Arriaga, 2014. "Distinction and Status Production on User-Generated Content Platforms: Using Bourdieu’s Theory of Cultural Production to Understand Social Dynamics in Online Fields," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 468-488, September.
    5. Angelo Antoci & Alexia Delfino & Fabio Paglieri & Fabrizio Panebianco & Fabio Sabatini, 2016. "Civility vs. Incivility in Online Social Interactions: An Evolutionary Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Alison J. Bianchi & Soong Moon Kang & Daniel Stewart, 2012. "The Organizational Selection of Status Characteristics: Status Evaluations in an Open Source Community," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 341-354, April.
    7. Stefan Hoffmann & Tom Joerß & Robert Mai & Payam Akbar, 2022. "Augmented reality-delivered product information at the point of sale: when information controllability backfires," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 743-776, July.
    8. Catherine Durnell Cramton, 2001. "The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 346-371, June.
    9. Tangirala, Subrahmaniam & Alge, Bradley J., 2006. "Reactions to unfair events in computer-mediated groups: A test of uncertainty management theory," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 1-20, May.
    10. Antoci, Angelo & Bonelli, Laura & Paglieri, Fabio & Reggiani, Tommaso & Sabatini, Fabio, 2019. "Civility and trust in social media," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 83-99.
    11. Giurge, Laura M. & Bohns, Vanessa K., 2021. "You don’t need to answer right away! Receivers overestimate how quickly senders expect responses to non-urgent work emails," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 114-128.
    12. Jordan Carpenter & Daniel Preotiuc-Pietro & Jenna Clark & Lucie Flekova & Laura Smith & Margaret L. Kern & Anneke Buffone & Lyle Ungar & Martin Seligman, 2018. "The impact of actively open-minded thinking on social media communication," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 13(6), pages 562-574, November.
    13. Fabio Sabatini & Francesco Sarracino, 2017. "Online Networks and Subjective Well-Being," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(3), pages 456-480, August.
    14. Meissner, Jens O., 2005. "Relationship Quality in the Context of Computer-Mediated Communication - A social constructionist approach," Working papers 2005/15, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    15. Sumita Raghuram & Philipp Tuertscher & Raghu Garud, 2010. "Research Note ---Mapping the Field of Virtual Work: A Cocitation Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 983-999, December.
    16. Masoom Muhammad Rehan & Alam Md Nahid & Arif Rubaiyat Bin, 2016. "The Social Presences in Text-Based Collaborations Via Electronic Devices: Measuring the ‘Online-Self’ of the Young Generation in Bangladesh," European Review of Applied Sociology, Sciendo, vol. 9(13), pages 39-53, December.
    17. Vivi Nastase & Sabine Koeszegi & Stan Szpakowicz, 2007. "Content Analysis Through the Machine Learning Mill," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 335-346, July.
    18. Yates, JoAnne, 1951- & Orlikowski, Wanda J., 1993. "Knee-jerk anti-LOOPism and other E-mail phenomena : oral, written, and electronic patterns in computer-mediated communication," Working papers WP 3578-93., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    19. R. Agarwal & Florence Rodhain, 2002. "Mine or ours: email privacy expectations, employee attitudes, and perceived work environment characteristics," Post-Print hal-03904969, HAL.
    20. Laura J. Kornish & Jeremy Hutchison‐Krupat, 2017. "Research on Idea Generation and Selection: Implications for Management of Technology," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(4), pages 633-651, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:16:y:2011:i:1:p:137-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.