IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v22y2017i2p118-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Friendship, Gender and Sexual Experience: Retrospective Narratives about the Formation of a Sexual Self during Youth

Author

Listed:
  • Verónica Policarpo

Abstract

In this article, I explore the ways in which friendship contributes to shaping the boundaries of men's and women's sexual experiences. Using inputs from the sociology of experience and the sociology of friendship, I explore qualitative data from a research about sexuality in Portugal, in which I collected sexual biographies of 35 men and women, aged 30-55. In the in-depth interviews, these adult participants, possessing secondary and tertiary education, and living in urban areas, reflected retrospectively about their sexual biography, including their childhood and youth. The main thesis is that the practices of friendship (which structure those relationships as social facts) also help to structure sexual practices and representations and, through them, to construct the contemporary sexual self. Those practices may be discursive (‘talking’ and ‘chatting’), or rather oriented to action (‘doing things together’). In this article, I focus on discursive friendship practices, and how they contribute to shaping contemporary sexual experience. Drawing on F. Dubet's sociology of experience, I argue that this relationship is defined in the tension along three dimensions: integration, strategy and subjectivation. This process is cross-cut by gender, as discursive friendship practices interact differently with the dimensions of sexual experience, in that strategy mainly reinforces definitions and enactment of hegemonic forms of masculinity, while subjectivation helps to challenge them and to build plural gender experiences (both feminine and masculine).

Suggested Citation

  • Verónica Policarpo, 2017. "Friendship, Gender and Sexual Experience: Retrospective Narratives about the Formation of a Sexual Self during Youth," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(2), pages 118-129, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:22:y:2017:i:2:p:118-129
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.4284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.4284
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.4284?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shelley Budgeon, 2006. "Friendship and Formations of Sociality in Late Modernity: The Challenge of ‘Post Traditional Intimacy’," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 11(3), pages 48-58, September.
    2. Verónica Policarpo, 2015. "What Is a Friend? An Exploratory Typology of the Meanings of Friendship," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-21, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maree Martinussen, 2019. "Reason, Season, or Life? Heterorelationality and the Limits of Intimacy between Women Friends," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 24(3), pages 297-313, September.
    2. Linda L. Layne, 2015. "A Changing Landscape of Intimacy: The Case of a Single Mother by Choice," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 20(4), pages 156-171, November.
    3. Lynn Jamieson & Fran Wasoff & Roona Simpson, 2009. "Solo-Living, Demographic and Family Change: The Need to know more about men," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 14(2), pages 20-35, March.
    4. Bo-Chiuan Su & Li-Wei Wu & Yevvon-Yi-Chi Chang & Ruo-Hao Hong, 2021. "Influencers on Social Media as References: Understanding the Importance of Parasocial Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Mary Holmes, 2011. "Emotional Reflexivity in Contemporary Friendships: Understanding it Using Elias and Facebook Etiquette," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(1), pages 137-148, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:22:y:2017:i:2:p:118-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.