IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v9y2019i2p2158244019846696.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Affects What? Perceived Cannabis Availability and Its Use Among Czech Urban Youth—A Multilevel Sociogeographic Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ladislav Kážmér
  • Pavla Chomynová
  • Ladislav Csémy

Abstract

Although there is already considerable research on the connection between the availability of substance and the prevalence of its use, the relative effect that one factor has on the other is rather unclear. The present study aims to scrutinize the mutual relationship between subjectively perceived cannabis availability and the prevalence of cannabis use among 15- to 16-year-old students, applying an integrative multilevel analytic framework. The Czech 2011 European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs (ESPAD) dataset ( N = 8,069 respondents) entered multilevel regression analyses to examine the sociogeographical inequalities in both perceived availability and adolescent frequent cannabis use (individuals [Level 1] nested within schools [Level 2] and localities [Level 3]). At the same time, the mutual relationship of the two cannabis indicators was demonstrated. At the level of individuals (Level 1), the simultaneous equations modeling (SEM) approach was applied to estimate the relative effect of perceived cannabis availability on the frequency of cannabis use and compare it vice versa. Adolescents coming from highly urbanized areas perceived cannabis to be more readily available, and they had a higher prevalence of frequent cannabis use. The higher availability mediated the sociogeographic inequalities in cannabis use. The locality unemployment rate was unrelated to either of the two cannabis indicators. At the individual level of the adolescent respondent, the effect of perceived availability on cannabis use appears to be much stronger than that of the effect of cannabis use on perceived availability when reversed. Perceived availability was found to mediate sociogeographic inequalities in cannabis use among Czechs adolescents. If a higher availability increases opportunities for adolescent substance misuse, then alongside other preventive measures, a spatially integrated approach should be applied in the national drug policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Ladislav Kážmér & Pavla Chomynová & Ladislav Csémy, 2019. "What Affects What? Perceived Cannabis Availability and Its Use Among Czech Urban Youth—A Multilevel Sociogeographic Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:2158244019846696
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244019846696
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244019846696
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244019846696?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karen A. Snedker & Jerald R. Herting & Emily Walton, 2009. "Contextual Effects and Adolescent Substance Use: Exploring the Role of Neighborhoods," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 90(5), pages 1272-1297, December.
    2. Bernburg, Jon Gunnar & Thorlindsson, Thorolfur & Sigfusdottir, Inga D., 2009. "The neighborhood effects of disrupted family processes on adolescent substance use," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 129-137, July.
    3. Daniel F. McCaffrey & Rosalie Liccardo Pacula & Bing Han & Phyllis Ellickson, 2010. "Marijuana use and high school dropout: the influence of unobservables," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(11), pages 1281-1299, November.
    4. Cronk, C.E. & Sarvela, P.D., 1997. "Alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use among rural/small town and urban youth: A secondary analysis of the monitoring the future data set," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 87(5), pages 760-764.
    5. Lukas Pitel & Andrea Geckova & Jitse vanDijk & Sijmen Reijneveld, 2011. "Degree of urbanization and gender differences in substance use among Slovak adolescents," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 56(6), pages 645-651, December.
    6. Andrea Geckova & Jitse Dijk & Johan Groothoff & Doeke Post, 2002. "Socio-economic differences in health risk behaviour and attitudes towards health risk behaviour among Slovak adolescents," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 47(4), pages 233-239, July.
    7. Alan C. Acock, 2013. "Discovering Structural Equation Modeling Using Stata," Stata Press books, StataCorp LP, number dsemus, March.
    8. Lukas Pitel & Andrea Madarasova Geckova & Jitse Dijk & Sijmen Reijneveld, 2011. "Erratum to: Degree of urbanization and gender differences in substance use among Slovak adolescents," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 56(6), pages 669-669, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edyta Suliga & Elżbieta Cieśla & Sven Michel & Helena Kaducakova & Titus Martin & Grzegorz Śliwiński & Alexander Braun & Marcela Izova & Maria Lehotska & Dorota Kozieł & Stanisław Głuszek, 2020. "Diet Quality Compared to the Nutritional Knowledge of Polish, German, and Slovakian University Students—Preliminary Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Pei, Fei & Wang, Yixuan & Wu, Qi & Shockley McCarthy, Karla & Wu, Shiyou, 2020. "The roles of neighborhood social cohesion, peer substance use, and adolescent depression in adolescent substance use," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    3. Lukas Pitel & Andrea Geckova & Jitse vanDijk & Sijmen Reijneveld, 2011. "Degree of urbanization and gender differences in substance use among Slovak adolescents," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 56(6), pages 645-651, December.
    4. Janina Isabel Steinert & Lucie Dale Cluver & G. J. Melendez-Torres & Sebastian Vollmer, 2018. "One Size Fits All? The Validity of a Composite Poverty Index Across Urban and Rural Households in South Africa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 51-72, February.
    5. Dehghani, Milad & William Kennedy, Ryan & Mashatan, Atefeh & Rese, Alexandra & Karavidas, Dionysios, 2022. "High interest, low adoption. A mixed-method investigation into the factors influencing organisational adoption of blockchain technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 393-411.
    6. Jan C. Ours & Jenny Williams, 2015. "Cannabis Use And Its Effects On Health, Education And Labor Market Success," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 993-1010, December.
    7. Xiaohui Hou & Bo Wang & Yu Gao, 2020. "Stakeholder Protection, Public Trust, and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Listed SMEs in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-25, July.
    8. Wanyun Shao & Feng Hao, 2020. "Approval of political leaders can slant evaluation of political issues: evidence from public concern for climate change in the USA," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 158(2), pages 201-212, January.
    9. Egamberdiev, Bekhzod, 2024. "Social capital effects on resilience to food insecurity: Evidence from Kyrgyzstan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 36(1), pages 435-450.
    10. Tasminda K. Dhaliwal & Soledad De Gregorio & Ann Owens & Gary Painter, 2021. "Putting Homelessness in Context: The Schools and Neighborhoods of Students Experiencing Homelessness," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 693(1), pages 158-176, January.
    11. Chu, Yu-Wei Luke & Gershenson, Seth, 2018. "High times: The effect of medical marijuana laws on student time use," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 142-153.
    12. Yen Sin Koh & Gerald Choon-Huat Koh & David Bruce Matchar & Song-Iee Hong & Bee Choo Tai, 2021. "Examining the Influence of Social Interactions and Community Resources on Caregivers’ Burden in Stroke Settings: A Prospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-14, November.
    13. Migbaru Alamirew Workneh & Zerayehu Sime Eshete, 2021. "Household Level Non-Monetary Poverty in Ethiopia and its Driving Factors: a Multidimensional Approach with Panel Estimation," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 145-168, February.
    14. Stephanie E. Mansion & Andreas Bausch, 2020. "Intangible assets and SMEs’ export behavior: a meta-analytical perspective," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 727-760, October.
    15. Xianglong Xu & Lingli Liu & Manoj Sharma & Yong Zhao, 2015. "Smoking-Related Knowledge, Attitudes, Behaviors, Smoking Cessation Idea and Education Level among Young Adult Male Smokers in Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    16. Tom W. Smith & Jibum Kim, 2013. "An Assessment of the Multi-level Integrated Database Approach," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 645(1), pages 185-221, January.
    17. Juan Xi & Matthew Lee & William LeSuer & Peter Barr & Katherine Newton & Margaret Poloma, 2017. "Altruism and Existential Well-Being," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 12(1), pages 67-88, March.
    18. Alexander C. Lewis & Arkangel M. Cordero & Rachael Xiong, 2021. "Too Red for Crowdfunding: The Legitimation and Adoption of Crowdfunding Across Political Cultures," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(3), pages 471-504, May.
    19. Harnois, Catherine E. & Bastos, João L. & Campbell, Mary E. & Keith, Verna M., 2019. "Measuring perceived mistreatment across diverse social groups: An evaluation of the Everyday Discrimination Scale," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 298-306.
    20. Deborah A. Cobb-Clark & Sonja C. Kassenboehmer & Trinh Le & Duncan McVicar & Rong Zhang, 2015. "‘High’-School: The Relationship between Early Marijuana Use and Educational Outcomes," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 91(293), pages 247-266, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:2158244019846696. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.