IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v149y2022icp393-411.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High interest, low adoption. A mixed-method investigation into the factors influencing organisational adoption of blockchain technology

Author

Listed:
  • Dehghani, Milad
  • William Kennedy, Ryan
  • Mashatan, Atefeh
  • Rese, Alexandra
  • Karavidas, Dionysios

Abstract

This study examines the factors influencing blockchain’s adoption intention as a whole, relying on an organisational perspective and the Technology-Organisation-Environment Framework (TOE). To organise and investigate the factors and to study blockchain technology adoption intention, this research employs a mixed-methodology. After an extended literature review, first, a qualitative approach is used to discover the factors from primary data collected from 25 interviews. Second, a quantitative survey is employed directly relating the factors to blockchain adoption intention and empirically testing them with 146 employees from 71 North American organisations. A total of 15 factors are discovered, seven are tested, and six are significant. In particular, the technology factors perceived interoperability and perceived data quality have a positive impact upon blockchain adoption intention, while the effect is negative for perceived technological volatility, regulatory uncertainty, standardisation uncertainty and the perceived lack of technological knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Dehghani, Milad & William Kennedy, Ryan & Mashatan, Atefeh & Rese, Alexandra & Karavidas, Dionysios, 2022. "High interest, low adoption. A mixed-method investigation into the factors influencing organisational adoption of blockchain technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 393-411.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:149:y:2022:i:c:p:393-411
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296322004386
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    2. Yang, Chung-Shan, 2019. "Maritime shipping digitalization: Blockchain-based technology applications, future improvements, and intention to use," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 108-117.
    3. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    4. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Louis Guttman, 1953. "Reliability formulas that do not assume experimental independence," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 18(3), pages 225-239, September.
    6. Janssen, Marijn & Weerakkody, Vishanth & Ismagilova, Elvira & Sivarajah, Uthayasankar & Irani, Zahir, 2020. "A framework for analysing blockchain technology adoption: Integrating institutional, market and technical factors," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 302-309.
    7. Rese, Alexandra & Ganster, Lena & Baier, Daniel, 2020. "Chatbots in retailers’ customer communication: How to measure their acceptance?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    8. Martin, Silvia L. & Javalgi, Rajshekhar (Raj) G. & Ciravegna, Luciano, 2020. "Marketing capabilities and international new venture performance: The mediation role of marketing communication and the moderation effect of technological turbulence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 25-37.
    9. Kamble, Sachin S. & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Kumar, Vikas & Belhadi, Amine & Foropon, Cyril, 2021. "A machine learning based approach for predicting blockchain adoption in supply Chain," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    10. Jesse Yli-Huumo & Deokyoon Ko & Sujin Choi & Sooyong Park & Kari Smolander, 2016. "Where Is Current Research on Blockchain Technology?—A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, October.
    11. Kevin Zhu & Kenneth L. Kraemer & Sean Xu, 2006. "The Process of Innovation Assimilation by Firms in Different Countries: A Technology Diffusion Perspective on E-Business," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(10), pages 1557-1576, October.
    12. Simon Fernandez-Vazquez & Rafael Rosillo & David De La Fuente & Paolo Priore, 2019. "Blockchain in FinTech: A Mapping Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-24, November.
    13. Takehiko Isobe & Shige Makino & David Montgomery, 2008. "Technological capabilities and firm performance: The case of small manufacturing firms in Japan," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 413-428, September.
    14. Hughes, Laurie & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Misra, Santosh K. & Rana, Nripendra P. & Raghavan, Vishnupriya & Akella, Viswanadh, 2019. "Blockchain research, practice and policy: Applications, benefits, limitations, emerging research themes and research agenda," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 114-129.
    15. William H. DeLone & Ephraim R. McLean, 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 60-95, March.
    16. Shet, Sateesh.V. & Poddar, Tanuj & Wamba Samuel, Fosso & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2021. "Examining the determinants of successful adoption of data analytics in human resource management – A framework for implications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 311-326.
    17. Ranganathan, C. & Teo, Thompson S.H. & Dhaliwal, Jasbir, 2011. "Web-enabled supply chain management: Key antecedents and performance impacts," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 533-545.
    18. Alan C. Acock, 2013. "Discovering Structural Equation Modeling Using Stata," Stata Press books, StataCorp LP, number dsemus.
    19. Wang, Yunsen & Kogan, Alexander, 2018. "Designing confidentiality-preserving Blockchain-based transaction processing systems," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 1-18.
    20. Nathalie Demoulin & Kristof Coussement, 2018. "Acceptance of text-mining systems: The signaling role of information quality," Post-Print hal-02111772, HAL.
    21. Sachin Kamble & Angappa Gunasekaran & Vikas Kumar & Amine Belhadi & Cyril Foropon, 2021. "A machine learning based approach for predicting blockchain adoption in supply chain," Post-Print hal-03539287, HAL.
    22. Chalmers, Dominic & Matthews, Russell & Hyslop, Amy, 2021. "Blockchain as an external enabler of new venture ideas: Digital entrepreneurs and the disintermediation of the global music industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 577-591.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gunay, Samet & Goodell, John W. & Muhammed, Shahnawaz & Kirimhan, Destan, 2023. "Frequency connectedness between FinTech, NFT and DeFi: Considering linkages to investor sentiment," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Hakkarainen, Tuuli & Colicev, Anatoli, 2023. "Blockchain-enabled advances (BEAs): Implications for consumers and brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Haynes, Paul & Hietanen, Joel, 2023. "Marketing without trust? – Blockchain technologies in the sharing economy as assemblage and pharmakon," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    4. Zhang, Ying & Gong, Bing & Zhou, Peng, 2024. "Centralized use of decentralized technology: Tokenization of currencies and assets," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 15-25.
    5. Komulainen, Ruey & Nätti, Satu, 2023. "Barriers to blockchain adoption: Empirical observations from securities services value network," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    6. Shahzad, Khuram & Zhang, Qingyu & Ashfaq, Muhammad & Zafar, Abaid Ullah & Ahmad, Bilal, 2024. "Pre- to post-adoption of blockchain technology in supply chain management: Influencing factors and the role of firm size," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    7. Zhang, Ying & Gong, Bing & Zhou, Peng, 2024. "Centralized use of decentralized technology: Tokenization of currencies and assets," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 15-25.
    8. Lavaei Adaryani, Rasool & Palouj, Mojtaba & Karbasioun, Mostafa & Asadi, Ali & Gholami, Hesamedin & Kianirad, Ali & Joodi Damirchi, Milad, 2024. "Antecedents of blockchain adoption in the poultry supply chain: An extended UTAUT model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    9. Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Balakrishnan, Janarthanan & Das, Ronnie & Dutot, Vincent, 2023. "Resistance to innovation: A dynamic capability model based enquiry into retailers’ resistance to blockchain adaptation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    10. Ikramuddin Junejo & Dr. Taskeen Zahra Buriro & Muhammad Sufyan Ramish & Dr. Syed Salahuddin, 2024. "Impact of Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness on Behavioral Intention to Use Blockchain in Food Supply Firms: The Mediating Role of Employee Attitude," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(2), pages 174-180.
    11. Horst Treiblmaier & Elena Petrozhitskaya, 2023. "Is it time for marketing to reappraise B2C relationship management? The emergence of a new loyalty paradigm through blockchain technology," Post-Print hal-04521356, HAL.
    12. Treiblmaier, Horst & Petrozhitskaya, Elena, 2023. "Is it time for marketing to reappraise B2C relationship management? The emergence of a new loyalty paradigm through blockchain technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    13. Kirimhan, Destan, 2023. "Importance of anti-money laundering regulations among prosumers for a cybersecure decentralized finance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    14. Jianing, Pang & Bai, Keke & Solangi, Yasir Ahmed & Magazzino, Cosimo & Ayaz, Kamran, 2024. "Examining the role of digitalization and technological innovation in promoting sustainable natural resource exploitation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    15. Hamood Mohammed Al-Hattami, 2024. "What factors influence the intention to adopt blockchain technology in accounting education?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    16. Ammar AL-Ashmori & Gunasekar Thangarasu & P. D. D. Dominic & Al-Baraa Abdulrahman Al-Mekhlafi, 2023. "A Readiness Model and Factors Influencing Blockchain Adoption in Malaysia’s Software Sector: A Survey Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-28, August.
    17. Antsipava, Dasha & Strycharz, Joanna & van Reijmersdal, Eva A. & van Noort, Guda, 2024. "What drives blockchain technology adoption in the online advertising ecosystem? An interview study into stakeholders’ perspectives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen-Lung Shiau & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2013. "Citation and co-citation analysis to identify core and emerging knowledge in electronic commerce research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(3), pages 1317-1337, March.
    2. Teck Ming Tan & Saila Saraniemi, 2023. "Trust in blockchain-enabled exchanges: Future directions in blockchain marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 914-939, July.
    3. Siti Salwa Mohd Ishak & Sidney Newton, 2018. "Testing a Model of User Resistance Towards Technology Adoption in Construction Organizations," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    5. Schniederjans, Dara G., 2017. "Adoption of 3D-printing technologies in manufacturing: A survey analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 287-298.
    6. Wasfi Al-Rawabdah & Adel A. Salloum & Serene Zakaria Tarawneh, 2021. "The Moderating Role Of Factors That Influence User Adoption Of Mobile Health Applications: Evidence From Jordan," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18.
    7. repec:hal:journl:hal-04734348 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Barbara H. Wixom & Peter A. Todd, 2005. "A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 85-102, March.
    9. Adams, Peter & Farrell, Mark & Dalgarno, Barney & Oczkowski, Edward, 2017. "Household Adoption of Technology: The Case of High-Speed Broadband Adoption in Australia," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 37-47.
    10. Wasapon Thanabodypath & Achara Chandrachai & Sudkate Chaiyo & Orawon Chailapakul, 2021. "Industrial Buyer Innovation Adoption Model: A Focus on a Smartphone-Based Electrochemical Analytical Device for Toxic Heavy Metal Detection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Thorsten Knauer & Nicole Nikiforow & Sebastian Wagener, 2020. "Determinants of information system quality and data quality in management accounting," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 97-121, April.
    12. Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Banita Lal & Michael D. Williams & Marc Clement, 2017. "Citizens’ adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 549-568, June.
    13. Sahebi, Iman Ghasemian & Mosayebi, Alireza & Masoomi, Behzad & Marandi, Fatemeh, 2022. "Modeling the enablers for blockchain technology adoption in renewable energy supply chain," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    14. Vicki McKinney & Kanghyun Yoon & Fatemeh “Mariam” Zahedi, 2002. "The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction: An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 296-315, September.
    15. Gaffar Hafiz Sagala & Dóra Őri, 2024. "Toward SMEs digital transformation success: a systematic literature review," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 667-719, December.
    16. Andrew Burton-Jones & Allen S. Lee, 2017. "Thinking About Measures and Measurement in Positivist Research: A Proposal for Refocusing on Fundamentals," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 451-467, September.
    17. Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene & Amir Karbassi Yazdi & Amir Mehdiabadi, 2022. "Integration of Blockchain Technology and Prioritization of Deployment Barriers in the Blood Supply Chain," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Heijden, Hans van der, 2000. "E-Tam : a revision of the Technology Acceptance Model to explain website revisits," Serie Research Memoranda 0029, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    19. Schoenherr, Tobias, 2023. "Supply chain management professionals’ proficiency in big data analytics: Antecedents and impact on performance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    20. Zeng, Fangli & Chan, Hing Kai & Pawar, Kulwant, 2020. "The adoption of open platform for container bookings in the maritime supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    21. Wenjuan Xu & Peiyu Ou & Weiguo Fan, 2017. "Antecedents of ERP assimilation and its impact on ERP value: A TOE-based model and empirical test," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 13-30, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:149:y:2022:i:c:p:393-411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.