IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v4y2014i3p2158244014547325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parental Bonding

Author

Listed:
  • T. Paul de Cock
  • Mark Shevlin

Abstract

Estimating the early parent–child bonding relationship can be valuable in research and practice. Retrospective dimensional measures of parental bonding provide a means for assessing the experience of the early parent–child relationship. However, combinations of dimensional scores may provide information that is not readily captured with a dimensional approach. This study was designed to assess the presence of homogeneous groups in the population with similar profiles on parental bonding dimensions. Using a short version of the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI), three parental bonding dimensions (care, authoritarianism, and overprotection) were used to assess the presence of unobserved groups in the population using latent profile analysis. The class solutions were regressed on 23 covariates (demographics, parental psychopathology, loss events, and childhood contextual factors) to assess the validity of the class solution. The results indicated four distinct profiles of parental bonding for fathers as well as mothers. Parental bonding profiles were significantly associated with a broad range of covariates. This person-centered approach to parental bonding has broad utility in future research which takes into account the effect of parent–child bonding, especially with regard to “affectionless control†style parenting.

Suggested Citation

  • T. Paul de Cock & Mark Shevlin, 2014. "Parental Bonding," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(3), pages 21582440145, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:4:y:2014:i:3:p:2158244014547325
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244014547325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244014547325
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244014547325?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hirotugu Akaike, 1987. "Factor analysis and AIC," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 317-332, September.
    2. Stanley Sclove, 1987. "Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 333-343, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schreier, Alayna & Stenersen, Madeline R. & Strambler, Michael J. & Marshall, Tim & Bracey, Jeana & Kaufman, Joy S., 2023. "Needs of caregivers of youth enrolled in a statewide system of care: A latent class analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    2. William Magee & Sébastien St-Arnaud, 2012. "Models of the Joint Structure of Domain-Related and Global Distress: Implications for the Reconciliation of Quality of Life and Mental Health Perspectives," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 105(1), pages 161-185, January.
    3. repec:jss:jstsof:06:i02 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Moira Mckniff & Stephanie M. Simone & Tania Giovannetti, 2023. "Age, Loneliness, and Social Media Use in Adults during COVID-19: A Latent Profile Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-12, May.
    5. Jennifer M. Boldero & Richard C. Bell & Susan M. Moore, 2010. "Do gambling activity patterns predict gambling problems? A latent class analysis of gambling forms among Australian youth," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 151-163, August.
    6. Caili Liu & Yong Wei & Yu Ling & E. Scott Huebner & Yifang Zeng & Qin Yang, 2020. "Identifying Trajectories of Chinese High School Students’ Depressive Symptoms: an Application of Latent Growth Mixture Modeling," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 15(3), pages 775-789, July.
    7. Seamus Fleming & Mark Shevlin & Jamie Murphy & Stephen Joseph, 2014. "Psychosis within dimensional and categorical models of mental illness," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 4-15, January.
    8. Hanna Lee & Jeong-Won Han, 2021. "Analysis of Parenting Attitude Types and Influencing Factors of Korean Parents by Using Latent Transition Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-13, July.
    9. Thao Thi Phuong Nguyen & Ha Ngoc Do & Thao Bich Thi Vu & Khanh Long Vu & Hiep Duy Nguyen & Dung Tuan Nguyen & Hoang Minh Do & Nga Thi Thu Nguyen & Ly Thi Bac La & Linh Phuong Doan & Tham Thi Nguyen & , 2023. "Association of Individual and Neighborhood Characteristics to Problematic Internet Use among Youths and Adolescents: Evidence from Vietnam," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-14, January.
    10. Ssu-Kuang Chen & Sunny Lin, 2014. "The Latent Profiles of Life Domain Importance and Satisfaction in a Quality of Life Scale," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 116(2), pages 429-445, April.
    11. Qi Chen & Wen Luo & Gregory J. Palardy & Ryan Glaman & Amber McEnturff, 2017. "The Efficacy of Common Fit Indices for Enumerating Classes in Growth Mixture Models When Nested Data Structure Is Ignored," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440177, March.
    12. Cappelli, Christopher & Pike, James Russell & Riggs, Nathaniel R. & Warren, Christopher M. & Pentz, Mary Ann, 2019. "Executive function and probabilities of engaging in long-term sedentary and high calorie/low nutrition eating behaviors in early adolescence," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 1-1.
    13. Terry Elrod & Gerald Häubl & Steven Tipps, 2012. "Parsimonious Structural Equation Models for Repeated Measures Data, with Application to the Study of Consumer Preferences," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(2), pages 358-387, April.
    14. Yu Ling & E. Scott Huebner & Hongmei Yuan & Zhihua Li & Wenli Liu, 2016. "Subtyping of Strengths and Difficulties in a Chinese Adolescent Sample: a Latent Class Analysis," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 9(4), pages 933-948, December.
    15. Hye-Gyeong Son & Kyu-Hyoung Jeong & Heeran J. Cho & Minuk Lee, 2021. "Changes in Types of Drinking Behavior in Korean Adults: Differences in Demographics, Depression, and Suicidal Thoughts," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-8, July.
    16. Yu Ling & E. Scott Huebner & Yu-shu He & Ming-tian Zhong, 2016. "Three Subtypes of Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors in Chinese Adolescents: Results of a Latent Class Analysis," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 11(4), pages 1309-1320, December.
    17. Sanghyun Park, 2022. "Examining Trajectories of Early Adolescents’ Life Satisfaction in South Korea Using a Growth Mixture Model," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(1), pages 149-168, February.
    18. Dave Bouckenooghe & Dirk De Clercq & Usman Raja, 2019. "A person-centered, latent profile analysis of psychological capital," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(1), pages 91-108, February.
    19. Boduszek, Daniel & Debowska, Agata & Willmott, Dominic, 2017. "Latent profile analysis of psychopathic traits among homicide, general violent, property, and white-collar offenders," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 17-23.
    20. Jiwon Lee & Midam An & Yongku Kim & Jung-In Seo, 2021. "Optimal Allocation for Electric Vehicle Charging Stations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-10, September.
    21. Hamparsum Bozdogan, 1987. "Model selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 345-370, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:4:y:2014:i:3:p:2158244014547325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.