IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v4y2014i1p2158244014525418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extraneous Effects of Race, Gender, and Race-Gender Homo- and Heterophily Conditions on Data Quality

Author

Listed:
  • A. Olu Oyinlade
  • Alex Losen

Abstract

This study comprehensively investigated the differences in response patterns of interview respondents by race, gender, and race-gender of both respondents and interviewers, to assess the impacts of response inconsistencies on data quality during survey interviews. The study focused only on Blacks and Whites in various interview phily matches. Interviewees ( N = 491) responded to fully structured, closed-ended questions through direct interviews on support for affirmative action, and support for the 2009 America’s Affordable Health Choices Act as dependent variables. Findings showed various amounts of response differences to both dependent variables by differences in race, gender, and race-gender of respondents, vis-à -vis those of the interviewers’, thereby constituting various amounts of data inconsistencies. The effects of race, gender, and race-gender of both interviewers and respondents constitute potential nonrandom errors that must be controlled in interview survey research, otherwise, research findings and conclusions may diverge from true relationships between variables.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Olu Oyinlade & Alex Losen, 2014. "Extraneous Effects of Race, Gender, and Race-Gender Homo- and Heterophily Conditions on Data Quality," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440145, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:2158244014525418
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244014525418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244014525418
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244014525418?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Min Gong & David Aadland, 2011. "Interview Effects in an Environmental Valuation Telephone Survey," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 49(1), pages 47-64, May.
    2. A. Olu Oyinlade, 2013. "Affirmative Action Support in an Organization," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, December.
    3. Allen, Richard L. & Dawson, Michael C. & Brown, Ronald E., 1989. "A Schema-Based Approach to Modeling an African-American Racial Belief System," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 83(2), pages 421-441, June.
    4. Darren W. Davis & Brian D. Silver, 2003. "Stereotype Threat and Race of Interviewer Effects in a Survey on Political Knowledge," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(1), pages 33-45, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tricia Koroknay†Palicz & Joao Montalvao, 2020. "Sex, Lies, and Surveys: The Role of Interviewer Characteristics," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(4), pages 3313-3324.
    2. Boschini, Anne & Dreber, Anna & von Essen, Emma & Muren, Astri & Ranehill, Eva, 2018. "Gender and altruism in a random sample," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 72-77.
    3. Niklas Egels-Zandén, 2014. "Revisiting Supplier Compliance with MNC Codes of Conduct: Recoupling Policy and Practice at Chinese Toy Suppliers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 59-75, January.
    4. Eugenio Paglino & Tom Emery, 2020. "Evaluating interviewer manipulation in the new round of the Generations and Gender Survey," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(50), pages 1461-1494.
    5. Su-Hao Tu & Pei-Shan Liao, 2007. "Social Distance, Respondent Cooperation and Item Nonresponse in Sex Survey," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 177-199, April.
    6. Rebecca Pietrelli & Marco d’Errico & Kate Dassesse, 2021. "Measuring household food security through surveys: Do the characteristics of the enumerators matter?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(6), pages 911-925, November.
    7. Mitoko, Jeremiah, 2021. "Concentration of power and Populism's Rise in America: evidence from recent US elections," MPRA Paper 108757, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Min Gong & Geoffrey Heal, 2014. "Why do People Care about Sea Lions? A Fishing Game to Study the Value of Endangered Species," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 59(4), pages 503-523, December.
    9. Bleakley, Amy & Ellithorpe, Morgan E. & Hennessy, Michael & Jamieson, Patrick E. & Khurana, Atika & Weitz, Ilana, 2017. "Risky movies, risky behaviors, and ethnic identity among Black adolescents," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 131-137.
    10. Saemyi Park, 2021. "Asian Americans’ Perception of Intergroup Commonality with Blacks and Latinos: The Roles of Group Consciousness, Ethnic Identity, and Intergroup Contact," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    11. Kissner, Jason & Pyrooz, David C., 2009. "Self-control, differential association, and gang membership: A theoretical and empirical extension of the literature," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 478-487, September.
    12. Jas M. Sullivan & Alexandra Ghara, 2015. "Racial Identity and Intergroup Attitudes: A Multiracial Youth Analysis," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 96(1), pages 261-272, March.
    13. Bruckmeier, Kerstin & Müller, Gerrit & Riphahn, Regina T., 2015. "Survey misreporting of welfare receipt—Respondent, interviewer, and interview characteristics," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 103-107.
    14. Jae-Eun Kim & Kim Johnson, 2013. "The Impact of Moral Emotions on Cause-Related Marketing Campaigns: A Cross-Cultural Examination," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(1), pages 79-90, January.
    15. Marcelo Lima, 2017. "Survey sponsor effects on the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions," GRI Working Papers 272, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    16. Niklas Egels‐Zandén & Markus Kallifatides, 2009. "The UN Global Compact and the Enlightenment tradition: a rural electrification project under the aegis of the UN Global Compact," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(5), pages 264-277, September.
    17. Loría, Luis Enrique & Watson, Verity & Kiso, Takahiko & Phimister, Euan, 2019. "Investigating users' preferences for Low Emission Buses: Experiences from Europe's largest hydrogen bus fleet," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-1.
    18. McGinnity, Frances & Creighton, Mathew & Fahey, Éamonn, 2020. "Hidden versus revealed attitudes: a list experiment on support for minorities in Ireland," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number BKMNEXT372.
    19. Niklas Egels-Zandén, 2007. "Suppliers’ Compliance with MNCs’ Codes of Conduct: Behind the Scenes at Chinese Toy Suppliers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 45-62, September.
    20. Weihua An & Christopher Winship, 2017. "Causal Inference in Panel Data With Application to Estimating Race-of-Interviewer Effects in the General Social Survey," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 46(1), pages 68-102, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:2158244014525418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.