IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i2p21582440241255430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Clean Beauty Trend Among Millennial and Generation Z Consumers: Assessing the Safety, Ethicality, and Sustainability Attributes of Cosmetic Products

Author

Listed:
  • Jiyong Shim
  • Jung Woo
  • Hyerin Yeo
  • Sujin Kang
  • Boseong Kwon
  • Eui Jung Lee
  • Jooyoung Oh
  • Euitaek Jeong
  • Junman Lim
  • Sun Gyoo Park

Abstract

The concept of clean beauty lacks a precise definition and its defining attributes remain unclear. This study assesses the impact of clean beauty on Millennial and Generation Z consumers, identifies its main attributes, and provides a new index for determining products’ cleanness . To this end, 120 Korean participants were recruited; they used 10 cosmetic products and completed relevant questionnaires. Clean beauty awareness and product satisfaction were assessed from the cognitive and emotional perspectives. The Reliable Cleanness Score (RCS) was calculated using emotional product satisfaction. Participants’ preference for clean beauty products was correlated with engaged cosmetic shopping behaviors. The key clean beauty attributes were sustainability, safety, and ethicality—in that order. Machine learning-based regression analysis showed that objective and subjective data could be used to calculate the RCS, resulting in an R 2 value of .721. With the results of this study, manufacturers, retailers, and consumers will be able to predict RCS.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiyong Shim & Jung Woo & Hyerin Yeo & Sujin Kang & Boseong Kwon & Eui Jung Lee & Jooyoung Oh & Euitaek Jeong & Junman Lim & Sun Gyoo Park, 2024. "The Clean Beauty Trend Among Millennial and Generation Z Consumers: Assessing the Safety, Ethicality, and Sustainability Attributes of Cosmetic Products," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241255430
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241255430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241255430
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241255430?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dan-Cristian Dabija & Brândușa Mariana Bejan & Claudiu Pușcaș, 2020. "A Qualitative Approach to the Sustainable Orientation of Generation Z in Retail: The Case of Romania," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Eunyoung Choi & Kun Chang Lee, 2019. "Effect of Trust in Domain-Specific Information of Safety, Brand Loyalty, and Perceived Value for Cosmetics on Purchase Intentions in Mobile E-Commerce Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-24, November.
    3. Nora Amberg & Csaba Fogarassy, 2019. "Green Consumer Behavior in the Cosmetics Market," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, July.
    4. R. Bret Leary & Richard J. Vann & John D. Mittelstaedt, 2019. "Perceived Marketplace Influence and Consumer Ethical Action," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 1117-1145, September.
    5. Damien Chaney & Mourad Touzani & Karim Ben Slimane, 2017. "Marketing to the (new) generations: summary and perspectives," Post-Print hal-02047966, HAL.
    6. Liang Xiao & Feipeng Guo & Fumao Yu & Shengnan Liu, 2019. "The Effects of Online Shopping Context Cues on Consumers’ Purchase Intention for Cross-Border E-Commerce Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    7. José Magano & Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira & Bruna Ferreira & Ângela Leite, 2022. "A Cross-Sectional Study on Ethical Buyer Behavior towards Cruelty-Free Cosmetics: What Consequences for Female Leadership Practices?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Mano, Haim & Oliver, Richard L, 1993. "Assessing the Dimensionality and Structure of the Consumption Experience: Evaluation, Feeling, and Satisfaction," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(3), pages 451-466, December.
    9. Jacky Chin & Bernard C. Jiang & Ilma Mufidah & Satria Fadil Persada & Bustanul Arifin Noer, 2018. "The Investigation of Consumers’ Behavior Intention in Using Green Skincare Products: A Pro-Environmental Behavior Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.
    10. Cindy Grappe & Cindy Lombart & Didier Louis & Fabien Durif, 2022. "Clean labeling: Is it about the presence of benefits or the absence of detriments? Consumer response to personal care claims," Post-Print hal-04293232, HAL.
    11. Sara Bom & Helena Margarida Ribeiro & Joana Marto, 2020. "Sustainability Calculator: A Tool to Assess Sustainability in Cosmetic Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    12. Damien Chaney & Mourad Touzani & Karim Ben Slimane, 2017. "Marketing to the (new) generations: summary and perspectives," Post-Print hal-02541232, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camelia Grădinaru & Daniel-Rareș Obadă & Ioan-Alexandru Grădinaru & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2022. "Enhancing Sustainable Cosmetics Brand Purchase: A Comprehensive Approach Based on the SOR Model and the Triple Bottom Line," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Yam B. Limbu & A. F. M. Jalal Ahamed, 2023. "What Influences Green Cosmetics Purchase Intention and Behavior? A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Benedikt M. Brand & Theresa Maria Rausch & Jannika Brandel, 2022. "The Importance of Sustainability Aspects When Purchasing Online: Comparing Generation X and Generation Z," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, May.
    4. Jorge Vieira & Rui Frade & Raquel Ascenso & Inês Prates & Filipa Martinho, 2020. "Generation Z and Key-Factors on E-Commerce: A Study on the Portuguese Tourism Sector," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Camila Kolling & José Luis Duarte Ribeiro & Donato Morea & Gianpaolo Iazzolino, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and circular economy from the perspective of consumers: A cross‐cultural analysis in the cosmetic industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1226-1243, May.
    6. Sabina Lissitsa & Ofrit Kol, 2021. "Four generational cohorts and hedonic m-shopping: association between personality traits and purchase intention," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 545-570, June.
    7. Pavel Pelech, 2023. "Marketing Perspectives on Supply and Demand in the Sharing Economy: Who Are the Target Generations?," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(3), pages 81-101.
    8. Eunyoung Choi & Kun Chang Lee, 2019. "Effect of Trust in Domain-Specific Information of Safety, Brand Loyalty, and Perceived Value for Cosmetics on Purchase Intentions in Mobile E-Commerce Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-24, November.
    9. Emilian Dobrescu, 2023. "Modelling Generational Changes : USA as a Study Case," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(3), pages 17-39, October.
    10. Mirza Mohammad Didarul Alam & Nor Azila Mohd Noor, 2020. "The Relationship Between Service Quality, Corporate Image, and Customer Loyalty of Generation Y: An Application of S-O-R Paradigm in the Context of Superstores in Bangladesh," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    11. Swapan Kumar Saha & Paulo Duarte & Susana C. Silva & Guijun Zhuang, 2021. "Supporting sustainability by promoting online purchase through enhancement of online convenience," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7251-7272, May.
    12. Jegatheesan Rajadurai & Wan Noordiana Wan Hanafi & Vathana Bathmanathan & Salina Daud & Nurnazurah Azami, 2021. "Developing nexus eco-purchasing behaviour index (NEPBI) for Malaysia by using partial least square analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(6), pages 2017-2039, December.
    13. Arian Seyedimany & Mehmet Haluk Koksal, 2022. "Segmentation of Turkish Wine Consumers Based on Generational Cohorts: An Exploratory Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Mark Legg & Timothy Webb & Apostolos Ampountolas, 2022. "Marketing to the next generation of casino patrons," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 89-101, March.
    15. Trinh Thi Hong Van & Chung Tin Fah, 2022. "Social Media Marketing and ıts Influence on Brand Loyalty towards Fast Fashion Brands among Vietnamese Millennials," Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Eurasian Publications, vol. 10(4), pages 204-225.
    16. Rob Kim Marjerison & Chungil Chae & Shitong Li, 2021. "Investor Activity in Chinese Financial Institutions: A Precursor to Economic Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
    17. Hazem Ali & Min Li & Yunhong Hao, 2021. "Purchasing Behavior of Organic Food among Chinese University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, May.
    18. Irene (Eirini) Kamenidou & Aikaterini Stavrianea & Evangelia-Zoi Bara, 2020. "Generational Differences toward Organic Food Behavior: Insights from Five Generational Cohorts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, March.
    19. Cristina Gómez-Román & Maria Luisa Lima & Gloria Seoane & Mónica Alzate & Marcos Dono & José-Manuel Sabucedo, 2020. "Testing Common Knowledge: Are Northern Europeans and Millennials More Concerned about the Environment?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Walter, Nadine & Föhl, Ulrich & Sander, Frauke & Nies, Angelique, 2024. "Act as you preach! Authentic brand purpose versus “woke washing’s” impact on brand credibility: The moderating role of cause involvement and consumer skepticism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241255430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.