Author
Listed:
- Joe E. Assoua
- Ernest L. Molua
- Robert Nkendah
Abstract
Africa’s destiny hinges on accessing the lucrative markets in the northern hemisphere. However, non-tariff measures in particular sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) measures have become a prominent tool in the regulation of international trade in agricultural and food products and have been increasingly recognized as one of the major determinants of market access, particularly to the European Union. However, there is very limited empirical evidence on the impact of sanitary and phytosanitary measures on Africa and Cameroon’s agricultural exports. This paper contributes to the literature by investigating the impact of changes in sanitary and phytosanitary measures in importing countries on coffee exports from Cameroon at the 6-digit HS level, using the gravity model and the modified Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood estimators. The analysis is based on trade data between Cameroon and 10 major importing countries in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) between 2001 and 2020. These results suggest that coffee export from Cameroon is not significantly affected or influenced by sanitary and phytosanitary measures in major importing markets; that is, the standards had weak trade effects on coffee exports. Other factors such as income, language, and labor size were significant in influencing trade flows in the export commodities. These results further point to the low productive capacity of the country’s coffee sub-sector. The supply-side constraints in the coffee sub-sector can be addressed by the government by improving access to high-yield coffee varieties by farmers, educating and training farmers on good agricultural practices through agricultural extension programs, and upgrading the market infrastructure.
Suggested Citation
Joe E. Assoua & Ernest L. Molua & Robert Nkendah, 2024.
"Evidence of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures on Africa’s Agricultural Trade: The Case of Coffee Exports from Cameroon to the OECD,"
SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241243135
DOI: 10.1177/21582440241243135
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241243135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.