IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v106y2024ics0149718924000764.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Faculty Online Teaching Effectiveness Scale (FOTES): Instrument development and content validation

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Yea-Jyh
  • Smith, Yvonne M.
  • Stidham, Andrea Warner

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and psychometrically test the Faculty Online Teaching Effectiveness Scale (FOTES) based upon both student and faculty perspectives of online teaching and learning in higher education. Online teaching effectiveness is a crucial component of quality education, but it has not been well-defined conceptually, and few studies have been conducted, using relevant domains, to accurately measure online teaching effectiveness. The impact of online course delivery on teaching effectiveness remains unclear. An exploratory sequential mixed methods design was employed with three phases of instrument development and psychometric testing. The FOTES comprises 50 items in seven domains: teaching philosophy, self-efficacy, relationships, course content, learning activities, teaching practices, and satisfaction. The instrument underwent initial testing, yielding positive expert appraisals with good-excellent psychometrics. All domains of the scale were significantly correlated, except for teaching philosophy. The preliminary results of the FOTES provide the empirical evidence to advance additional psychometric validation. This newly developed instrument has the potential to enhance faculty capacity and skill in self-evaluating their teaching effectiveness in online courses, providing a valid and reliable measure. The resulting instrument is poised to promote outcome evaluation and strengthen teaching and learning processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Yea-Jyh & Smith, Yvonne M. & Stidham, Andrea Warner, 2024. "Faculty Online Teaching Effectiveness Scale (FOTES): Instrument development and content validation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:106:y:2024:i:c:s0149718924000764
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000764
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102474?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christine Frazer & Debra Henline Sullivan & Deborah Weatherspoon & Leslie Hussey, 2017. "Faculty Perceptions of Online Teaching Effectiveness and Indicators of Quality," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-6, February.
    2. Bin Zou & Lulu Huang & Wulin Ma & Yuqing Qiu, 2021. "Evaluation of the effectiveness of EFL online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kun Zhang & Haoxian Wu, 2022. "Synchronous Online Learning During COVID-19: Chinese University EFL Students’ Perspectives," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    2. Gudivada Venkat Rao & D. Vijayalakshmi, 2022. "Preference for Mode of Learning for Knowledge and Skills by Professional Management Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic Period," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 47(1), pages 22-39, February.
    3. Wasif Minhas & Timothy White & Georgia Daleure & Nadia Solovieva & Hisham Hanfy, 2021. "Establishing an Effective Blended Learning Model: Teacher Perceptions from the United Arab Emirates," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    4. Tong Zhou & Wei Zhang, 2022. "Effectiveness Study on Online or Blended Language Learning Based on Student Achievement: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-29, June.
    5. Ruth-Elizabeth Minga-Vallejo & María-Soledad Ramírez-Montoya & María-José Rodríguez-Conde, 2024. "Open and Collaborative Innovation for the Social Construction of Learning: Descriptive Analysis of an xMOOC Design," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    6. Yu-Yu Ma & Jwu-Jenq Chen & Chia-Liang Lin, 2022. "Research on the Priority of Service Quality Index for Online English Teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Dual Perspective," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Farhan, Wejdan & Razmak, Jamil & Demers, Serge & Laflamme, Simon, 2019. "E-learning systems versus instructional communication tools: Developing and testing a new e-learning user interface from the perspectives of teachers and students," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    8. Abdelrahman Abdalla Salih & Lamis Ismail Omar, 2023. "Reflective Glimpses of Culture in EFL Online Classes during COVID-19 Pandemic in Oman," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:106:y:2024:i:c:s0149718924000764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.