IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i2p21582440231211802.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling Exploration of EFL Learners’ Perceptions of What Contributes to the Readability of Model Paragraphs

Author

Listed:
  • Tuyen Thanh Nguyen
  • John R. Baker
  • Thao Quang Le

Abstract

This study investigated what features undergraduate EFL learners perceive as affecting the difficulty of model paragraphs. Four hundred and seventy-five Vietnamese undergraduates participated in a partial least squares structural equation model design. They ranked five paragraphs from easiest to most difficult and responded to a 10-point Likert questionnaire regarding 11 features (titles, paragraph length, vocabulary, vocabulary in context, rhetorical organization, paragraph structure, sentence length, punctuation, signal words, interest, background knowledge). The results showed that eight variables (titles, vocabulary, vocabulary in context, sentence length, rhetorical organization, paragraph structure, interest, background knowledge) had a significant direct effect and four variables (vocabulary, sentence length, rhetorical organization, background knowledge) had mediating effects. The model accounted for 0.508 R 2 of students’ perceptions, with a moderate to high predictive relevance ( Q 2  = 0.35). The paper also discusses the results’ implications for those in writing studies and the publishing industry. Suggestions for future study are also presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Tuyen Thanh Nguyen & John R. Baker & Thao Quang Le, 2024. "A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling Exploration of EFL Learners’ Perceptions of What Contributes to the Readability of Model Paragraphs," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440231, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440231211802
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231211802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231211802
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231211802?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siti Ahmad & Ahmad Muhammad & Aini Kasim, 2018. "Contextual Clues Vocabulary Strategies Choice among Business Management Students," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(4), pages 107-107, April.
    2. Eleanor Singer & Cong Ye, 2013. "The Use and Effects of Incentives in Surveys," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 645(1), pages 112-141, January.
    3. Frederick Davis, 1944. "Fundamental factors of comprehension in reading," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 9(3), pages 185-197, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haifeng Zhao & Nosherwan Khaliq & Chunling Li & Judit Oláh, 2024. "In quest of perceived transaction cost’s impact on fintech users’ intention: the moderating role of situational factors," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Jing Peng & Christophe Van den Bulte, 2024. "Participation vs. Effectiveness in Sponsored Tweet Campaigns: A Quality-Quantity Conundrum," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(11), pages 7961-7983, November.
    3. Yutaka Kano, 1990. "Noniterative estimation and the choice of the number of factors in exploratory factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 277-291, June.
    4. Bürgel, Tobias R. & Hiebl, Martin R.W. & Pielsticker, David I., 2023. "Digitalization and entrepreneurial firms' resilience to pandemic crises: Evidence from COVID-19 and the German Mittelstand," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    5. McLeod, Branden A. & Johnson, Waldo E. & Cryer-Coupet, Qiana R. & Mincy, Ronald B., 2019. "Examining the longitudinal effects of paternal incarceration and coparenting relationships on sons' educational outcomes: A mediation analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 362-375.
    6. Daniel Vujcich & Graham Brown & Jo Durham & Zhihong Gu & Lisa Hartley & Roanna Lobo & Limin Mao & Piergiorgio Moro & Vivienne Pillay & Amy B. Mullens & Enaam Oudih & Meagan Roberts & Caitlin Wilshin &, 2022. "Strategies for Recruiting Migrants to Participate in a Sexual Health Survey: Methods, Results, and Lessons," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-25, September.
    7. Nadeem, Kashif & Wong, Sut I. & Za, Stefano & Venditti, Michelina, 2024. "Digital transformation and industry 4.0 employees: Empirical evidence from top digital nations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    8. Tobias Gummer & Pablo Christmann & Sascha Verhoeven & Christof Wolf, 2022. "Using a responsive survey design to innovate self‐administered mixed‐mode surveys," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(3), pages 916-932, July.
    9. Hannah Schwarz & Melanie Revilla & Bella Struminskaya, 2022. "Do previous survey experience and participating due to an incentive affect response quality? Evidence from the CRONOS panel," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(3), pages 981-1003, July.
    10. Kim, Hyung Jin & Kim, Inchan & Lee, Hogeun, 2016. "Third-party mobile app developers’ continued participation in platform-centric ecosystems: An empirical investigation of two different mechanisms," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 44-59.
    11. Jomocan, Cynthia O, 2022. "Context Clues Knowledge and Reading Comprehension Skills of Grade 10 Students," Technium Education and Humanities, Technium Science, vol. 2(1), pages 48-60.
    12. Cassandra Crowe & Belinda Middleweek & Laura Ryan & Alicia Vidler & Bronwen Whiting, 2024. "The role of gender in promotion rates in the Australian Finance Industry," Papers 2409.14384, arXiv.org.
    13. W. Gibson, 1959. "Three multivariate models: Factor analysis, latent structure analysis, and latent profile analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 24(3), pages 229-252, September.
    14. Yutaka Kano & Masamori Ihara, 1994. "Identification of inconsistent variates in factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 59(1), pages 5-20, March.
    15. Rolf Becker, 2022. "The effects of a special sequential mixed-mode design, and reminders, on panellists’ participation in a probability-based panel study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 259-284, February.
    16. Peter Schönemann & Ming-Mei Wang, 1972. "Some new results on factor indeterminacy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 37(1), pages 61-91, March.
    17. K. Jöreskog, 1962. "On the statistical treatment of residuals in factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 27(4), pages 335-354, December.
    18. Zhou, Xizhen & Lv, Mengqi & Ji, Yanjie & Zhang, Shuichao & Liu, Yong, 2023. "Pricing curb parking: Differentiated parking fees or cash rewards?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 46-58.
    19. Ihara, Masamori & Kano, Yutaka, 1995. "Identifiability of full, marginal, and conditional factor analysis models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 343-350, June.
    20. Yutaka Kano & Akira Harada, 2000. "Stepwise variable selection in factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(1), pages 7-22, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440231211802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.