IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v52y2025i16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of mobile phone surveys for rapid mortality monitoring: A national study in Burkina Faso

Author

Listed:
  • Kassoum Dianou

    (Université catholique de Louvain)

  • Abdramane B. Soura

    (Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo)

  • Shammi Luhar

    (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)

  • Kelly McCain

    (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)

  • Georges Reniers

    (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)

  • Bruno Masquelier

    (Université catholique de Louvain)

  • Bruno Lankoandé

    (Institut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population (ISSP))

  • Ashira Menashe-Oren

    (Université catholique de Louvain)

  • Malebogo Tlhajoane

    (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)

  • Hervé Bassinga

    (Institut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population (ISSP))

Abstract

Background: In low- and middle-income countries, death registration remains low, and mortality estimation is heavily based on surveys and censuses conducted through face-to-face interviews. These operations are costly and time-consuming, and are difficult to conduct during health and security crises. Taking advantage of the rapid increase in cell phone network coverage, mobile phone surveys (MPS) have recently started to be used to collect mortality data. Objective: We computed mortality levels obtained from a national MPS conducted in 2021–2022 in Burkina Faso and compare them to estimates from censuses, surveys, and modeled estimates developed by United Nations agencies. Methods: The MPS included three modules adapted from standard questionnaires to reduce interview length: (1) truncated birth histories, (2) summary sibling histories, and (3) parental survival histories. We applied direct and indirect mortality estimation methods and used post-stratification weights to account for sample selectivity. Results: Indirect estimates of under-5 mortality aligned with UN estimates, but direct estimates extracted from truncated birth histories provided lower mortality rates. However, these lower direct estimates were consistent with the latest Demographic and Health Surveys, conducted in 2021. MPS estimates of 35q15 derived from the sibling histories were about half of those published by the UN. This downward bias is likely due to errors in reporting siblings’ ages and timing of death. Mortality levels at older ages (30q50) from the parental survival histories were also substantially lower than model-based UN estimates (with a relative difference of –20% among men and –34% among women). Contribution: MPS are a promising tool for the rapid measurement of age-specific mortality in settings where face-to-face surveys are difficult to implement. However, our findings also indicate that further research is needed to evaluate and improve on the quality of data collected over the phone.

Suggested Citation

  • Kassoum Dianou & Abdramane B. Soura & Shammi Luhar & Kelly McCain & Georges Reniers & Bruno Masquelier & Bruno Lankoandé & Ashira Menashe-Oren & Malebogo Tlhajoane & Hervé Bassinga, 2025. "The use of mobile phone surveys for rapid mortality monitoring: A national study in Burkina Faso," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 52(16), pages 479-518.
    • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:52:y:2025:i:16
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2025.52.16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol52/16/52-16.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2025.52.16?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eleanor Singer & Cong Ye, 2013. "The Use and Effects of Incentives in Surveys," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 645(1), pages 112-141, January.
    2. Headey, Derek D. & Oo, Than Zaw & Mahrt, Kristi & Diao, Xinshen & Goudet, Sophie & Lambrecht, Isabel, 2020. "Poverty, food insecurity, and social protection during COVID-19 in Myanmar: Combined evidence from a household telephone survey and micro-simulations," Myanmar SSP policy notes 35, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    3. Eran Bendavid & Benjamin Seligman & Jessica Kubo, 2011. "Comparative Analysis of Old-Age Mortality Estimations in Africa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-7, October.
    4. Joshua Brubaker & Talip Kilic & Philip Wollburg, 2021. "Representativeness of individual-level data in COVID-19 phone surveys: Findings from Sub-Saharan Africa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-27, November.
    5. Annette Jäckle & Caroline Roberts & Peter Lynn, 2010. "Assessing the Effect of Data Collection Mode on Measurement," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 78(1), pages 3-20, April.
    6. Johanna Brinkel & Alexander Krämer & Ralf Krumkamp & Jürgen May & Julius Fobil, 2014. "Mobile Phone-Based mHealth Approaches for Public Health Surveillance in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, November.
    7. Bruno Masquelier & Benjamin-Samuel Schlüter & Atoumane Fall & Stephane Helleringer & Ashira Menashe-Oren, 2024. "Improving old-age mortality estimation with parental survival histories in surveys," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 51(45), pages 1429-1470.
    8. Ben Leo, Robert Morello, Jonathan Mellon, Tiago Peixoto, and Stephen Davenport, 2015. "Do Mobile Phone Surveys Work in Poor Countries? - Working Paper 398," Working Papers 398, Center for Global Development.
    9. Soumaïla Ouedraogo, 2020. "Estimation of older adult mortality from imperfect data: A comparative review of methods using Burkina Faso censuses," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(38), pages 1119-1154.
    10. Kelly L’Engle & Eunice Sefa & Edward Akolgo Adimazoya & Emmanuel Yartey & Rachel Lenzi & Cindy Tarpo & Nii Lante Heward-Mills & Katherine Lew & Yvonne Ampeh, 2018. "Survey research with a random digit dial national mobile phone sample in Ghana: Methods and sample quality," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, January.
    11. Bruno Masquelier & Georges Reniers & Gilles Pison, 2014. "Divergences in trends in child and adult mortality in sub-Saharan Africa: Survey evidence on the survival of children and siblings," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(2), pages 161-177, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gourlay, Sydney & Kilic, Talip & Martuscelli, Antonio & Wollburg, Philip & Zezza, Alberto, 2021. "Viewpoint: High-frequency phone surveys on COVID-19: Good practices, open questions," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    2. Joshua Brubaker & Talip Kilic & Philip Wollburg, 2021. "Representativeness of individual-level data in COVID-19 phone surveys: Findings from Sub-Saharan Africa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-27, November.
    3. Monteiro Amaral,Sofia Fernando & Dinarte Diaz,Lelys Ileana & Dominguez,Patricio & Perez-Vincent,Santiago M. & Romero,Steffanny, 2022. "Talk or Text ? Evaluating Response Rates by Remote Survey Method during COVID-19," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9999, The World Bank.
    4. Rolf Becker, 2022. "The effects of a special sequential mixed-mode design, and reminders, on panellists’ participation in a probability-based panel study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 259-284, February.
    5. Elisa M. Maffioli, 2020. "Collecting Data During an Epidemic: A Novel Mobile Phone Research Method," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(8), pages 1231-1255, November.
    6. Zezza,Alberto & Mcgee,Kevin Robert & Wollburg,Philip Randolph & Assefa,Thomas Woldu & Gourlay,Sydney, 2022. "From Necessity to Opportunity : Lessons for Integrating Phone and In-Person Data Collectionfor Agricultural Statistics in a Post-Pandemic World," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10168, The World Bank.
    7. Zawojska, Ewa & Czajkowski, Mikotaj, 2017. "Are preferences stated in web vs. personal interviews different? A comparison of willingness to pay results for a large multi-country study of the Baltic Sea eutrophication reduction," Annual Meeting, 2017, June 18-21, Montreal, Canada 258604, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society.
    8. Ndashimye, Felix & Hebie, Oumarou & Tjaden, Jasper, 2021. "Effectiveness of WhatsApp for measuring migration in follow-up phone surveys - Lessons from a mode experiment in two low-income countries during COVID contact restrictions," OSF Preprints khd32, Center for Open Science.
    9. Maurice Kugler & Mariana Viollaz & Daniel Duque & Isis Gaddis & David Newhouse & Amparo Palacios-Lopez & Michael Weber, 2021. "How Did the COVID-19 Crisis Affect Different Types of Workers in the Developing World?," World Bank Publications - Reports 35950, The World Bank Group.
    10. Nadeem, Kashif & Wong, Sut I. & Za, Stefano & Venditti, Michelina, 2024. "Digital transformation and industry 4.0 employees: Empirical evidence from top digital nations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    11. Debra Wright & Matt Sloan & Kirsten Barrett, 2012. "Is There a Trade-off Between Quality and Cost? Telephone Versus Face-to-Face Interviewing of Persons with Disabilities," Mathematica Policy Research Reports cb6067df035641e99a913d534, Mathematica Policy Research.
    12. Haifeng Zhao & Nosherwan Khaliq & Chunling Li & Judit Oláh, 2024. "In quest of perceived transaction cost’s impact on fintech users’ intention: the moderating role of situational factors," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Mamine, Fateh & Fares, M'hand & Minviel, Jean Joseph, 2020. "Contract Design for Adoption of Agrienvironmental Practices: A Meta-analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    14. Jorre T. A. Vannieuwenhuyze & Geert Loosveldt, 2013. "Evaluating Relative Mode Effects in Mixed-Mode Surveys:," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 42(1), pages 82-104, February.
    15. Guimarães, Maria Helena & Nunes, Luís Catela & Madureira, Lívia & Santos, José Lima & Boski, Tomasz & Dentinho, Tomaz, 2015. "Measuring birdwatchers preferences: A case for using online networks and mixed-mode surveys," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 102-113.
    16. Mackeben, Jan, 2020. "Mode Effects in the Fourth Wave of the Linked Personnel Panel (LPP) Employee Survey," FDZ Methodenreport 202005_en, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    17. Emmanuel Souza & Funny Muthema & Georges Reniers & Stephane Helleringer & Monica Jamali & Michael Chasukwa & Julio Romero-Prieto & Jethro Banda & Malebogo Tlhajoane & Jacob Saikolo & Boniface Dulani, 2024. "Interrogating the quality and completion of mortality mobile phone interviews conducted in Malawi during COVID-19: An examination of interviewer–respondent interactions," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 51(46), pages 1471-1490.
    18. Baumüller, Heike & Kornher, Lukas, 2024. "Inside the crowd: Assessing the suitability of SMSbased surveys to monitor the food security situation in Uganda," IAAE 2024 Conference, August 2-7, 2024, New Delhi, India 344389, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE).
    19. Sahar Ahmed & Georges Reniers & Bruno Masquelier & David A. Sánchez-Páez & Julio Romero-Prieto & Tom Pullum, 2024. "Sample selection bias in adult mortality estimates from mobile phone surveys: Evidence from 25 low- and middle-income countries," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 51(37), pages 1167-1182.
    20. Helleringer, Stephane & Liu, Li & Chu, Yue & Rodrigues, Amabelia & Fisker, Ane Baerent, 2020. "Biases in Survey Estimates of Neonatal Mortality: Results from a Validation Study in Urban Areas of Guinea-Bissau," SocArXiv qx2kn_v1, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    mortality; mobile phones; surveys; low-and-middle-income countries; health and security crises; under-five mortality; Demographic Health Surveys; sample selection; age-specific mortality patterns; data quality; direct estimation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:52:y:2025:i:16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.