IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i4p21582440231205418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collective Adaptive Responses Through Coping and Sensemaking Under Stress

Author

Listed:
  • Jungsu Kim
  • Sukjun Lee

Abstract

This study explores adaptive response mechanisms as an appraisal of confronted stress through people’s activities of sending and receiving tweets with other Twitter users to share their thoughts, opinions or information on responses to a man-made disaster. We propose a model with a theoretical integration that represents the varying relations between stress and individuals’ responses over time. Using Twitter data from April 16, 2014, on the Sewol ferry disaster in Korea, our study found that the development of the collective response was characterized by individuals’ recurrent attempts to make sense of the causes and outcomes of an unexpected event in terms of time-dependent flows during the occurrence of the event. Collective sensemaking recurred when people could not make sense of the causes and results of unexpected events to facilitate the coping process. Our model provides insights into when and how a trigger event such as a disaster influences the development of shared collective response patterns.

Suggested Citation

  • Jungsu Kim & Sukjun Lee, 2023. "Collective Adaptive Responses Through Coping and Sensemaking Under Stress," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231205418
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231205418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231205418
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231205418?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lila Singh-Peterson & Paul Salmon & Claudia Baldwin & Natassia Goode, 2015. "Deconstructing the concept of shared responsibility for disaster resilience: a Sunshine Coast case study, Australia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(2), pages 755-774, November.
    2. Giovan Francesco Lanzara, 1983. "Ephemeral Organizations In Extreme Environments: Emergence, Strategy, Extinction [I]," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 71-95, January.
    3. Li Peng & Jing Tan & Lei Lin & Dingde Xu, 2019. "Understanding sustainable disaster mitigation of stakeholder engagement: Risk perception, trust in public institutions, and disaster insurance," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(5), pages 885-897, September.
    4. Dan Parrish C.S.C. & Timothy S. Clark & Samuel S. Holloway, 2020. "The collapse of sensemaking at Yarnell Hill: the effects of endogenous ecological chaos on enactment," European Journal of Management Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(2), pages 77-95, December.
    5. Christophe Roux-Dufort, 2007. "Is Crisis Management (only) a Management of exceptions?," Post-Print hal-02311783, HAL.
    6. Nicholas Evangelopoulos & Xiaoni Zhang & Victor R Prybutok, 2012. "Latent Semantic Analysis: five methodological recommendations," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 70-86, January.
    7. Madison Armstrong & Jennifer Carlson, 2019. "Speaking of trauma: the race talk, the gun violence talk, and the racialization of gun trauma," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-11, December.
    8. Anita Cremers & Hester Stubbé & Dolf van der Beek & Maaike Roelofs & José Kerstholt, 2015. "Does playing the serious game B-SaFe! make citizens more aware of man-made and natural risks in their environment?," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(10), pages 1280-1292, November.
    9. Rodríguez, Isabel & Kozusznik, Malgorzata Wanda & Peiró, José María & Tordera, Núria, 2019. "Individual, co-active and collective coping and organizational stress: A longitudinal study," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 86-98.
    10. Jacqueline Cramer & Angela Heijden, 2006. "Corporate Social Responsibility as a Tailor-Made Search Process," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Jan Jonker & Marco Witte (ed.), The Challenge of Organizing and Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility, chapter 13, pages 211-222, Palgrave Macmillan.
    11. Karl E. Weick & Kathleen M. Sutcliffe & David Obstfeld, 2005. "Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 409-421, August.
    12. Scott Deerwester & Susan T. Dumais & George W. Furnas & Thomas K. Landauer & Richard Harshman, 1990. "Indexing by latent semantic analysis," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 41(6), pages 391-407, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anouck Adrot & Jean-Luc Moriceau, 2013. "Introducing performativity to crisis management theory : an illustration from the 2003 French heat wave crisis response," Post-Print hal-01451075, HAL.
    2. Fengxiu Zhang, 2022. "Not all extreme weather events are equal: Impacts on risk perception and adaptation in public transit agencies," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 171(1), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Ashby, Simon & Peters, Linda D. & Devlin, James, 2014. "When an irresistible force meets an immovable object: The interplay of agency and structure in the UK financial crisis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 2671-2683.
    4. André Luis Silva & Márcia de Freitas Duarte & Flávia Plutarco, 2020. "Organizational Rare Events: Theory and Research Practice," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 72(4), pages 635-659, October.
    5. Marlys K. Christianson & Maria T. Farkas & Kathleen M. Sutcliffe & Karl E. Weick, 2009. "Learning Through Rare Events: Significant Interruptions at the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Museum," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(5), pages 846-860, October.
    6. Muñoz, Pablo & Naudé, Wim & Williams, Nick & Williams, Trenton & Frías, Rodrigo, 2020. "Reorienting entrepreneurial support infrastructure to tackle a social crisis: A rapid response," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    7. Jan Ketil Arnulf & Kai Rune Larsen & Øyvind Lund Martinsen, 2018. "Semantic algorithms can detect how media language shapes survey responses in organizational behaviour," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, December.
    8. Carlos Martin-Rios, 2016. "Innovative management control systems in knowledge work: a middle manager perspective," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 181-204, May.
    9. Ali Zackery & Joseph Amankwah-Amoah & Zahra Heidari Darani & Shiva Ghasemi, 2022. "COVID-19 Research in Business and Management: A Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    10. Elena Antonacopoulou, 2018. "Energising critique in action and in learning: The GNOSIS 4R Framework," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 102-125, May.
    11. Curci, Ylenia & Mongeau Ospina, Christian A., 2016. "Investigating biofuels through network analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 60-72.
    12. Guiette, Alain & Vandenbempt, Koen, 2017. "Change managerialism and micro-processes of sensemaking during change implementation," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 65-81.
    13. Martina Linnenluecke & Andrew Griffiths & Peter Mumby, 2015. "Executives’ engagement with climate science and perceived need for business adaptation to climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 321-333, July.
    14. Chao Wei & Senlin Luo & Xincheng Ma & Hao Ren & Ji Zhang & Limin Pan, 2016. "Locally Embedding Autoencoders: A Semi-Supervised Manifold Learning Approach of Document Representation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, January.
    15. Jeffery S. McMullen & Dimo Dimov, 2013. "Time and the Entrepreneurial Journey: The Problems and Promise of Studying Entrepreneurship as a Process," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(8), pages 1481-1512, December.
    16. Emil Evenhuis, 2017. "Institutional change in cities and regions: a path dependency approach," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 10(3), pages 509-526.
    17. Stea, Diego & Foss, Nicolai J. & Christensen, Peter Holdt, 2015. "Physical separation in the workplace: Separation cues, separation awareness, and employee motivation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 462-471.
    18. Tiina J. Peltola & Hanna Tiirinki, 2020. "More Than Numbers: Discourses of Health Care Quality in Finland," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    19. Rydén, Pernille & Ringberg, Torsten & Wilke, Ricky, 2015. "How Managers' Shared Mental Models of Business–Customer Interactions Create Different Sensemaking of Social Media," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 1-16.
    20. Amal Aouadi & Sylvain Marsat, 2018. "Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(4), pages 1027-1047, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231205418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.