IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i2p21582440221101051.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Game Strategy Selection of Multiple Participants in Cloud Manufacturing Alliance

Author

Listed:
  • Xueping Wang
  • Xin Yuan
  • Xinqin Gao

Abstract

Introducing the cloud platform operator (CPO) to manage all kinds of manufacturing services on the cloud service platform, the game strategy selection of the multiple participants in the cloud manufacturing alliance is one of current research hotspots of the cloud manufacturing mode. Based on the game theory, this article elaborates the multi-participants business collaboration process and proposes the game strategy selection framework of the multiple participants in the cloud manufacturing alliance. From the perspectives of the manufacturing resource demander (MRD), the manufacturing resource provider (MRP), and the CPO, the game types are analyzed, the benefit functions are established, the existences of game equilibria are proved, and their corresponding constraint conditions are obtained. Integrating the dominant game strategies of the multiple participants, the dominant combination strategies of the above three game equilibria are proposed and the intersection conditions of Nash equilibrium from the mixed perspective are obtained. A set of experimental data from the practical case is given to prove that the solution space of Nash equilibrium from the mixed perspective is not empty. This research provides the theoretical basis for the landing application of the cloud manufacturing mode and the technical support for the development of the cloud manufacturing service platform. It has the important academic value and the broad application prospects.

Suggested Citation

  • Xueping Wang & Xin Yuan & Xinqin Gao, 2022. "Game Strategy Selection of Multiple Participants in Cloud Manufacturing Alliance," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221101051
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221101051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221101051
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221101051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Panda, S. & Modak, N.M. & Basu, M. & Goyal, S.K., 2015. "Channel coordination and profit distribution in a social responsible three-layer supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 224-233.
    2. Manapat, Michael L. & Nowak, Martin A. & Rand, David G., 2013. "Information, irrationality, and the evolution of trust," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 90(S), pages 57-75.
    3. Chen, Jian & Huang, George Q. & Wang, Jun-Qiang & Yang, Chen, 2019. "A cooperative approach to service booking and scheduling in cloud manufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 861-873.
    4. Lozano, S. & Moreno, P. & Adenso-Díaz, B. & Algaba, E., 2013. "Cooperative game theory approach to allocating benefits of horizontal cooperation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 444-452.
    5. Mohebbi, Shima & Li, Xueping, 2015. "Coalitional game theory approach to modeling suppliers' collaboration in supply networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 333-342.
    6. Yongkui Liu & Lihui Wang & Xi Vincent Wang & Xun Xu & Lin Zhang, 2019. "Scheduling in cloud manufacturing: state-of-the-art and research challenges," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(15-16), pages 4854-4879, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mario Guajardo & Kurt Jörnsten & Mikael Rönnqvist, 2016. "Constructive and blocking power in collaborative transportation," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 25-50, January.
    2. Yong Liu & Bing-ting Quan & Jiao Li & Jeffrey Yi-Lin Forrest, 2018. "A Supply Chain Coordination Mechanism with Cost Sharing of Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Xinghua Wu & Sihuan Li, 2022. "Impacts of CSR Undertaking Modes on Technological Innovation and Carbon-Emission-Reduction Decisions of Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Eduardo Alarcon-Gerbier & Zarina Chokparova & Nassim Ghondaghsaz & Wanqi Zhao & Hani Shahmoradi-Moghadam & Uwe Aßmann & Orçun Oruç, 2022. "Software-Defined Mobile Supply Chains: Rebalancing Resilience and Efficiency in Production Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Dong Yang & Qidong Liu & Jia Li & Yongji Jia, 2020. "Multi-Objective Optimization of Service Selection and Scheduling in Cloud Manufacturing Considering Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Hatzenbühler, Jonas & Jenelius, Erik & Gidófalvi, Gyözö & Cats, Oded, 2023. "Modular vehicle routing for combined passenger and freight transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    7. Lozano, Miguel A. & Serra, Luis M. & Pina, Eduardo A., 2022. "Optimal design of trigeneration systems for buildings considering cooperative game theory for allocating production cost to energy services," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    8. Nassim Mrabti & Nadia Hamani & Laurent Delahoche, 2022. "A Comprehensive Literature Review on Sustainable Horizontal Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-38, September.
    9. Peng Ma & Yeming Gong & Mingzhou Jin, 2019. "Quality efforts in medical supply chains considering patient benefits," Post-Print hal-02312386, HAL.
    10. Lotte Verdonck & Katrien Ramaekers & Benoît Depaire & An Caris & Gerrit K. Janssens, 2019. "Analysing the Effect of Partner Characteristics on the Performance of Horizontal Carrier Collaborations," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 583-609, June.
    11. Qian Wang & Yongguang Zhong & Guangye Xu, 2019. "Optimal Decisions and Coordination in a Socially Responsible Supply Chain with Irresponsibility Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Zhitao Xu & Adel Elomri & Roberto Baldacci & Laoucine Kerbache & Zhenyong Wu, 2024. "Frontiers and trends of supply chain optimization in the age of industry 4.0: an operations research perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(2), pages 1359-1401, July.
    13. Hosseini-Motlagh, Seyyed-Mahdi & Govindan, Kannan & Nematollahi, Mohammadreza & Jokar, Abbas, 2019. "An adjustable bi-level wholesale price contract for coordinating a supply chain under scenario-based stochastic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 175-195.
    14. Xia Zhao & Runsheng Yin, 2018. "Coordination of a socially responsible two-stage supply chain under price-dependent random demand," 4OR, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 379-400, December.
    15. Qiang Du & Hongyu Zhu & Youdan Huang & Qiaoyu Pang & Jinzhao Shi, 2024. "Profit allocation of carbon emission reduction in the construction supply chain," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 20531-20560, August.
    16. Patanjal Kumar & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Yigit Kazancoglu & Ali Emrouznejad, 2023. "A decision framework for incorporating the coordination and behavioural issues in sustainable supply chains in digital economy," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 721-749, July.
    17. Guajardo, Mario & Rönnqvist, Mikael & Flisberg, Patrik & Frisk, Mikael, 2018. "Collaborative transportation with overlapping coalitions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 238-249.
    18. Defryn, Christof & Sörensen, Kenneth & Dullaert, Wout, 2019. "Integrating partner objectives in horizontal logistics optimisation models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-12.
    19. Paul Rauwolf & Joanna J. Bryson, 2018. "Expectations of Fairness and Trust Co-Evolve in Environments of Partial Information," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 891-917, December.
    20. Guajardo, Mario & Jörnsten, Kurt, 2015. "Common mistakes in computing the nucleolus," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(3), pages 931-935.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221101051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.