IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i18p7733-d415596.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Objective Optimization of Service Selection and Scheduling in Cloud Manufacturing Considering Environmental Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Dong Yang

    (School of Business and Management, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China)

  • Qidong Liu

    (School of Business and Management, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China)

  • Jia Li

    (School of Business and Management, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China)

  • Yongji Jia

    (School of Business and Management, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China)

Abstract

Cloud manufacturing is an emerging service-oriented paradigm that works by taking advantage of distributed manufacturing resources and capabilities to collaboratively perform a manufacturing task, with the consideration of QoS (Quality of Service) requirements such as cost, time and quality. Incorporating environmental concerns and sustainability into cloud manufacturing to produce a much greener product has become an urgent issue since there is fierce market competition and an increasing environment consciousness from customers. In this paper, we present a multi-objective optimization approach to selecting and scheduling cloud manufacturing services from the viewpoints of the economy and environment including carbon emissions and water resource. Subject to the carbon cap regulation, a multi-objective model for a cloud manufacturing task is built with the aim of minimizing total costs, carbon emissions, and water resource use. Transportation mode selections and carbon emissions from both cloud manufacturing services and transportation activities are taken into account in this model. The ε-constraint method is employed to obtain the exact Pareto front of optimal solutions. A case study from automobile cloud manufacturing is used to illustrate the effectiveness of the presented approach. Numerical experiments are conducted to compare the presented approach and the simple additive weighting method. The results show that the presented ε -constraint method can obtain a better and more diverse Pareto set of solutions and that it can solve the models in a reasonable time.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong Yang & Qidong Liu & Jia Li & Yongji Jia, 2020. "Multi-Objective Optimization of Service Selection and Scheduling in Cloud Manufacturing Considering Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7733-:d:415596
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7733/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7733/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei He & Guozhu Jia & Hengshan Zong & Jili Kong, 2019. "Multi-Objective Service Selection and Scheduling with Linguistic Preference in Cloud Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Yongkui Liu & Lihui Wang & Xi Vincent Wang & Xun Xu & Lin Zhang, 2019. "Scheduling in cloud manufacturing: state-of-the-art and research challenges," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(15-16), pages 4854-4879, August.
    3. Feng Li & Lin Zhang & T. W. Liao & Yongkui Liu, 2019. "Multi-objective optimisation of multi-task scheduling in cloud manufacturing," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(12), pages 3847-3863, June.
    4. Jorick Lartigau & Xiaofei Xu & Lanshun Nie & Dechen Zhan, 2015. "Cloud manufacturing service composition based on QoS with geo-perspective transportation using an improved Artificial Bee Colony optimisation algorithm," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(14), pages 4380-4404, July.
    5. Amina Chelly & Imen Nouira & Yannick Frein & Atidel Hadj-Alouane, 2019. "On The consideration of carbon emissions in modelling-based supply chain literature: the state of the art, relevant features and research gaps," Post-Print hal-02285426, HAL.
    6. Amina Chelly & Imen Nouira & Yannick Frein & Atidel B. Hadj-Alouane, 2019. "On The consideration of carbon emissions in modelling-based supply chain literature: the state of the art, relevant features and research gaps," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(15-16), pages 4977-5004, August.
    7. Yingfeng Zhang & Dong Xi & Haidong Yang & Fei Tao & Zhe Wang, 2019. "Cloud manufacturing based service encapsulation and optimal configuration method for injection molding machine," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(7), pages 2681-2699, October.
    8. Carl, Jeremy & Fedor, David, 2016. "Tracking global carbon revenues: A survey of carbon taxes versus cap-and-trade in the real world," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 50-77.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dong Yang & Jia Li & Bill Wang & Yong-ji Jia, 2020. "Module-Based Product Configuration Decisions Considering Both Economical and Carbon Emission-Related Environmental Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Maryam Shoaeinaeini & Kannan Govindan & Donya Rahmani, 2022. "Pricing policy in green supply chain design: the impact of consumer environmental awareness and green subsidies," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3989-4028, September.
    3. Ali Salmasnia & Zahra Kiapasha & Melika Pashaeenejad, 2024. "Subtasks scheduling of tasks with different structures in cloud manufacturing systems under maintenance policy and focusing on logistics, tardiness, and earliness aspects," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1-37, September.
    4. Yugang Yu & Xue Li & Xiaoping Xu, 2022. "Reselling or marketplace mode for an online platform: the choice between cap-and-trade and carbon tax regulation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 310(1), pages 293-329, March.
    5. Nan Li & Mingjiang Deng & Hanshu Mou & Deshan Tang & Zhou Fang & Qin Zhou & Changgao Cheng & Yingdi Wang, 2022. "Government Participation in Supply Chain Low-Carbon Technology R&D and Green Marketing Strategy Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-27, July.
    6. Asgari, Erfan & Hammami, Ramzi & Frein, Yannick & Nouira, Imen, 2021. "The effect of greenness- and price-based competition on a product's environmental performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    7. Meng, Mingyou & Deng, Shiming & Zhou, Pin & Xu, He, 2023. "The effects of subsidy programs in byproduct synergy operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    8. Kandil, Narjes & Hammami, Ramzi & Battaïa, Olga, 2022. "Insourcing versus outsourcing decision under environmental considerations and different contract arrangements," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    9. David Klenert & Franziska Funke & Linus Mattauch & Brian O’Callaghan, 2020. "Five Lessons from COVID-19 for Advancing Climate Change Mitigation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(4), pages 751-778, August.
    10. Kissinger, Gabrielle & Gupta, Aarti & Mulder, Ivo & Unterstell, Natalie, 2019. "Climate financing needs in the land sector under the Paris Agreement: An assessment of developing country perspectives," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 256-269.
    11. Tram T.H. Nguyen and Wonho Song, 2021. "Carbon Pricing and Income Inequality: An Empirical Investigation," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 46(2), pages 155-182, June.
    12. Lei Yang & Yufan Chen & Jingna Ji, 2018. "Cooperation Modes of Operations and Financing in a Low-Carbon Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-25, March.
    13. Grieder, Manuel & Baerenbold, Rebekka & Schmitz, Jan & Schubert, Renate, 2022. "The Behavioral Effects of Carbon Taxes – Experimental Evidence," VfS Annual Conference 2022 (Basel): Big Data in Economics 264112, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    14. Shiyong Yin & Jinsong Bao & Jie Zhang & Jie Li & Junliang Wang & Xiaodi Huang, 2020. "Real-time task processing for spinning cyber-physical production systems based on edge computing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(8), pages 2069-2087, December.
    15. Gilbert E. Metcalf & James H. Stock, 2023. "The Macroeconomic Impact of Europe's Carbon Taxes," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(3), pages 265-286, July.
    16. Eisner, Anna & Kulmer, Veronika & Kortschak, Dominik, 2021. "Distributional effects of carbon pricing when considering household heterogeneity: An EASI application for Austria," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    17. Gren, Ing-Marie & Höglind, Lisa & Jansson, Torbjörn, 2021. "Refunding of a climate tax on food consumption in Sweden," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    18. Tian, Xu & Dai, Hancheng & Geng, Yong & Huang, Zhen & Masui, Toshihiko & Fujita, Tsuyoshi, 2017. "The effects of carbon reduction on sectoral competitiveness in China: A case of Shanghai," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 270-278.
    19. Yan-chao Yin & Fu-zhao Chen & Wei-zhi Liao & Cui-yin Liu, 2019. "An Optimal Composition Strategy for Knowledge Service Component Based on Flexible Tracking Particle Swarm Algorithm," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-14, December.
    20. Daozhi Zhao & Yang Xue & Cejun Cao & Hongshuai Han, 2019. "Channel Selection and Pricing Decisions Considering Three Charging Modes of Production Capacity Sharing Platform: A Sustainable Operations Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-28, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7733-:d:415596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.