IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i2p21582440221096136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adoption Factors and Moderating Effects of Age and Gender That Influence the Intention to Use a Non-Directive Reflective Coaching Chatbot

Author

Listed:
  • Nicky Terblanche
  • Martin Kidd

Abstract

Chatbots are increasingly applied in various contexts including helping professions, such as organizational and life coaching. Coaching facilitates individual wellness, behavioral change, and goal attainment in a reflective, non-directive manner, and is considered one of the fastest-growing professions. The use of knowledge imparting service chatbots have been studied; however, the application of chatbots in coaching has received scant research attention, raising the question about which factors and moderating effects play a role in the adoption of reflective, non-directive coaching chatbots. In this study, we applied a modified Unified Theory of the Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model to determine factors and moderating effects of age and gender that influence the adoption of a goal-attainment coaching chatbot. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used for the analysis of a cross-sectional UTAUT survey ( n  = 226). Performance expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions had significant roles as direct determinants of intent to use the coaching chatbot. Gender moderated performance expectancy and age showed a moderation tendency on effort expectancy. This study on non-directive, reflective chatbots in the organizational, and life coaching domains contributes to our understanding of how to design chatbots aimed at helping people find their own answers.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicky Terblanche & Martin Kidd, 2022. "Adoption Factors and Moderating Effects of Age and Gender That Influence the Intention to Use a Non-Directive Reflective Coaching Chatbot," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221096136
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221096136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221096136
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221096136?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kasilingam, Dharun Lingam, 2020. "Understanding the attitude and intention to use smartphone chatbots for shopping," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    2. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    3. Natarajan, Thamaraiselvan & Balasubramanian, Senthil Arasu & Kasilingam, Dharun Lingam, 2017. "Understanding the intention to use mobile shopping applications and its influence on price sensitivity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 8-22.
    4. W.H. Loo & Paul H.P. Yeow & S.C.C Chong, 2011. "Acceptability of Multipurpose Smart National Identity Card: An Empirical Study," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 35-58, January.
    5. Lee, Nick & Cadogan, John W., 2013. "Problems with formative and higher-order reflective variables," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 242-247.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liangyong Xue & Abdullah Mat Rashid & Sha Ouyang, 2024. "The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) in Higher Education: A Systematic Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440241, February.
    2. Meennapa Rukhiran & Napasorn Phaokla & Paniti Netinant, 2022. "Adoption of Environmental Information Chatbot Services Based on the Internet of Educational Things in Smart Schools: Structural Equation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-32, November.
    3. Yuen, Kum Fai & Cai, Lanhui & Wee, Shaun Chuin Kit & Wang, Xueqin, 2024. "Pandemic-driven acceptance of urban drone deliveries," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 356-370.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meennapa Rukhiran & Napasorn Phaokla & Paniti Netinant, 2022. "Adoption of Environmental Information Chatbot Services Based on the Internet of Educational Things in Smart Schools: Structural Equation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-32, November.
    2. Garima Malik & A. Sajeevan Rao, 2019. "Extended expectation-confirmation model to predict continued usage of ODR/ride hailing apps: role of perceived value and self-efficacy," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 461-482, December.
    3. Sohn, Stefanie, 2017. "A contextual perspective on consumers' perceived usefulness: The case of mobile online shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 22-33.
    4. Zhang, Wenqing & Liu, Liangliang, 2022. "Exploring non-users' intention to adopt ride-sharing services: Taking into account increased risks due to the COVID-19 pandemic among other factors," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 180-195.
    5. Gabriel JIPA, 2018. "Mobile Applications Buying Opinions Exploration using Topic Modeling," Expert Journal of Economics, Sprint Investify, vol. 6(2), pages 44-55.
    6. Su-Chen(Cecilia) Lin & Mei-Chen Chuang & Chen-Yuan Huang & Chia-En Liu, 2023. "Nursing Staff’s Behavior Intention to Use Mobile Technology: An Exploratory Study Employing the UTAUT 2 Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    7. Christino, Juliana Maria Magalhães & Silva, Thaís Santos & Cardozo, Erico Aurélio Abreu & de Pádua Carrieri, Alexandre & de Paiva Nunes, Patricia, 2019. "Understanding affiliation to cashback programs: An emerging technique in an emerging country," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 78-86.
    8. Brusch, Ines & Rappel, Nina, 2020. "Exploring the acceptance of instant shopping – An empirical analysis of the determinants of user intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    9. Kala Kamdjoug, Jean Robert & Wamba-Taguimdje, Serge-Lopez & Wamba, Samuel Fosso & Kake, Ingrid Bive'e, 2021. "Determining factors and impacts of the intention to adopt mobile banking app in Cameroon: Case of SARA by afriland First Bank," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    10. Lara Stocchi & Naser Pourazad & Nina Michaelidou & Arry Tanusondjaja & Paul Harrigan, 2022. "Marketing research on Mobile apps: past, present and future," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 195-225, March.
    11. Miluska Murillo-Zegarra & Carla Ruiz-Mafe & Silvia Sanz-Blas, 2020. "The Effects of Mobile Advertising Alerts and Perceived Value on Continuance Intention for Branded Mobile Apps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    12. Natarajan, Thamaraiselvan & Balasubramanian, Senthil Arasu & Kasilingam, Dharun Lingam, 2018. "The moderating role of device type and age of users on the intention to use mobile shopping applications," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 79-90.
    13. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva & Sebastián Molinillo & Elena Higueras-Castillo, 2022. "Do biometric payment systems work during the COVID-19 pandemic? Insights from the Spanish users' viewpoint," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, December.
    14. Perengki Susanto & Mohammad Enamul Hoque & Verselly Nisaa & Md Asadul Islam & Yusniza Kamarulzaman, 2023. "Predicting m-Commerce Continuance Intention and Price Sensitivity in Indonesia by Integrating of Expectation-Confirmation and Post-acceptance Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    15. Hoffmann, Stefan & Lasarov, Wassili & Reimers, Hanna, 2022. "Carbon footprint tracking apps. What drives consumers' adoption intention?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    16. Luceri, Beatrice & (Tammo) Bijmolt, T.H.A. & Bellini, Silvia & Aiolfi, Simone, 2022. "What drives consumers to shop on mobile devices? Insights from a Meta-Analysis," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 178-196.
    17. Kasim, Kabir O. & Winter, Scott R. & Liu, Dahai & Keebler, Joseph R. & Spence, Tyler B., 2021. "Passengers’ perceptions on the use of biometrics at airports: A statistical model of the extended theory of planned behavior," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    18. Hartoyo & Fermico Karambut & Rita Nurmalina & Mukhamad Najib, 2019. "The Intention in Online Submission of Micro Credit," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 186-200.
    19. Dhiman, Neeraj & Jamwal, Mohit & Kumar, Ajay, 2023. "Enhancing value in customer journey by considering the (ad)option of artificial intelligence tools," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    20. Farzana Sharmin & Mohammad Tipu Sultan & Dake Wang & Alina Badulescu & Benqian Li, 2021. "Cultural Dimensions and Social Media Empowerment in Digital Era: Travel-Related Continuance Usage Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221096136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.