IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i4p21582440211052257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governing Airbnb in Amsterdam and Singapore: A Comparative Study on Governance Strategies and Styles

Author

Listed:
  • Yanwei Li
  • Genea Canelles

Abstract

The past decade has witnessed the fast spread of Airbnb, a specific example of sharing economy initiatives. Local governments around the world are struggling with policies and regulations to govern the negative externalities caused by Airbnb. In this respect, knowledge is lacking on differences in governance strategies and their effects. This article starts to fill this lacuna by comparing the governance strategies and their effects of two major, but totally different, cities in terms of governance styles: Singapore and Amsterdam. An analytic framework is developed distinguishing different strategies and governance style in enforcing these strategies and different types of response by sharing economy platforms. The Singapore government applied predominantly a hierarchical approach to address the challenges posed by Airbnb, whereas the Amsterdam government mostly adopted a collaborative approach, resulting in different responses by Airbnb. The article goes deeper into explaining these different governance styles and reflects on their implications as derived from the case studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanwei Li & Genea Canelles, 2021. "Governing Airbnb in Amsterdam and Singapore: A Comparative Study on Governance Strategies and Styles," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:21582440211052257
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440211052257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440211052257
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440211052257?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yanwei Li & Liang Ma, 2019. "What drives the governance of ridesharing? A fuzzy-set QCA of local regulations in China," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(4), pages 601-624, December.
    2. Joris Voets & Koen Verhoest & Astrid Molenveld, 2015. "Coordinating for Integrated Youth Care: The need for smart metagovernance," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(7), pages 981-1001, August.
    3. Yanwei Li & Araz Taeihagh & Martin De Jong, 2018. "The Governance of Risks in Ridesharing: A Revelatory Case from Singapore," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shouheng Sun & Shengjie Dong & Qi Wu & Xuejiao Tian, 2023. "How to Survive in the Shadow of Sharing Economy Giants: Business Model Innovation for Small and Medium-Sized Platforms," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shixingyue Hu & Yazao Yang, 2024. "Safety of female ride-hailing passengers: Perception and prevention," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Charles David A. Icasiano & Araz Taeihagh, 2021. "Governance of the Risks of Ridesharing in Southeast Asia: An In-Depth Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-32, June.
    3. Eva Sørensen & Jacob Torfing, 2021. "Accountable Government through Collaborative Governance?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Araz Taeihagh, 2021. "Governance of artificial intelligence [Application of artificial intelligence for development of intelligent transport system in smart cities]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(2), pages 137-157.
    5. Soltani, Ali & Allan, Andrew & Khalaj, Fahimeh & Pojani, Dorina & Mehdizadeh, Milad, 2021. "Ridesharing in Adelaide: Segmentation of users," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    6. de Oliveira, Gisliany L.A. & Silva, Ivanovitch & Lima, Luciana & Costa, Daniel G., 2023. "A composite indicator of liveability based on sociodemographic and Uber quality service dimensions: A data-driven approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 97-115.
    7. Aarthi Raghavan & Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & Araz Taeihagh, 2021. "Public Health Innovation through Cloud Adoption: A Comparative Analysis of Drivers and Barriers in Japan, South Korea, and Singapore," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-30, January.
    8. Xiao-xiao Liu & Feng Xiong & Xingqiang Du, 2023. "Innovator or Troublemaker? The Co-evolution of Ethical Controversies, Legitimation and Institutionalisation of the Ridesharing Firms in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(4), pages 723-737, September.
    9. Stephan Leixnering & Renate E Meyer & Tobias Polzer, 2021. "Hybrid coordination of city organisations: The rule of people and culture in the shadow of structures," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(14), pages 2933-2951, November.
    10. Shuguang Wang & Xuefu Sun & Shen Zhong, 2023. "Exploring the Multiple Paths to Improve the Construction Level of Digital Government: Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on the WSR Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    11. Ye Ma & Biying Yu & Meimei Xue, 2018. "Spatial Heterogeneous Characteristics of Ridesharing in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region of China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, November.
    12. Fernando Castelló-Sirvent & Vanessa Roger-Monzó & Juan Manuel García-García, 2021. "International economic policy: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis on think tanks in the press," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 2609-2627, January.
    13. Shilei Hu & Xiaohong Wang, 2021. "The Origin of Proactive Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility (ECSR) of Large Firms: Institutional Embeddedness—Driven, Family Involvement-Promoted, or Resource-Dependent?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, January.
    14. Yanwei Li & Araz Taeihagh & Martin de Jong & Andreas Klinke, 2021. "Toward a Commonly Shared Public Policy Perspective for Analyzing Risk Coping Strategies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 519-532, March.
    15. Si-Ying Tan & Araz Taeihagh & Kritika Sha, 2021. "How Transboundary Learning Occurs: Case Study of the ASEAN Smart Cities Network (ASCN)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Astrid Molenveld & Arwin Buuren & Gerald-Jan Ellen, 2020. "Governance of climate adaptation, which mode? An exploration of stakeholder viewpoints on how to organize adaptation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 233-254, September.
    17. Qianqi Xu & Peng Xu & Cunkuan Bao, 2023. "Multifaceted Pathways of Carbon Emission Reduction Policies: A Study Based on the Decoupling Effect and fsQCA Method in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
    18. Devyani Pande & Araz Taeihagh, 2021. "The Governance Conundrum of Powered Micromobility Devices: An In-Depth Case Study from Singapore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, May.
    19. Yuchen Gao & Jingrui Chen, 2019. "The Risk Reduction and Sustainable Development of Shared Transportation: The Chinese Online Car-hailing Policy Evaluation in the Digitalization Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, May.
    20. Tan, Si Ying & Taeihagh, Araz & Tripathi, Abhas, 2021. "Tensions and antagonistic interactions of risks and ethics of using robotics and autonomous systems in long-term care," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:21582440211052257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.