IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p9699-d1515955.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Risks of Green Crowdsourcing in South Africa: The Case of Dilivari

Author

Listed:
  • John Michael Maxel Okoche

    (Department of Operations Management, University of South Africa, Pretoria 0002, South Africa)

  • Anthea Amadi-Echendu

    (Department of Operations Management, University of South Africa, Pretoria 0002, South Africa)

  • Marcia Mkansi

    (Department of Operations Management, University of South Africa, Pretoria 0002, South Africa)

  • Wellington Chakuzira

    (Department of Operations Management, University of South Africa, Pretoria 0002, South Africa)

  • Phumlani Masilela

    (Department of Operations Management, University of South Africa, Pretoria 0002, South Africa)

Abstract

Green crowdsourcing mobile applications provide an appropriate supply chain coordination mechanism for deliveries, harnessing benefits for people, profits and the environment. Despite the benefits, the risks and challenges associated with green crowdsourcing undermine the social, economic and sustainability benefits of last mile logistics. We undertook an exploration of the risks of using the green crowdsourcing Dilivari mobile application (App) innovation in South Africa. The study used an exploratory research case study research design. The study included 54 respondents with rich, in-depth knowledge, 49 participants for focus group discussions (FGDs) and five key informant interviews. Our study established security, legal, human and connectivity risks associated with this app. We focused on the risks and challenges in the literature including critical emergent risks in a developing country context, compatibility of technology, load shedding, mobile penetration, and data costs. Furthermore, we highlighted the security risks posed by theft, robberies and terrorism.

Suggested Citation

  • John Michael Maxel Okoche & Anthea Amadi-Echendu & Marcia Mkansi & Wellington Chakuzira & Phumlani Masilela, 2024. "Exploring the Risks of Green Crowdsourcing in South Africa: The Case of Dilivari," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-28, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9699-:d:1515955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9699/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9699/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geoff Walsham, 1995. "The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 376-394, December.
    2. Wenyi Chen & Martijn Mes & Marco Schutten, 2018. "Multi-hop driver-parcel matching problem with time windows," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 517-553, September.
    3. John Mingers, 2001. "Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 240-259, September.
    4. Berthon, Pierre R. & Pitt, Leyland F. & McCarthy, Ian & Kates, Steven M., 2007. "When customers get clever: Managerial approaches to dealing with creative consumers," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 39-47.
    5. Archetti, Claudia & Savelsbergh, Martin & Speranza, M. Grazia, 2016. "The Vehicle Routing Problem with Occasional Drivers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 472-480.
    6. Yanwei Li & Araz Taeihagh & Martin De Jong, 2018. "The Governance of Risks in Ridesharing: A Revelatory Case from Singapore," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Lijuan Huang & Guojie Xie & John Blenkinsopp & Raoyi Huang & Hou Bin, 2020. "Crowdsourcing for Sustainable Urban Logistics: Exploring the Factors Influencing Crowd Workers’ Participative Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mario Binetti & Leonardo Caggiani & Rosalia Camporeale & Michele Ottomanelli, 2019. "A Sustainable Crowdsourced Delivery System to Foster Free-Floating Bike-Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Yıldız, Barış, 2021. "Package routing problem with registered couriers and stochastic demand," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    3. Azcuy, Irecis & Agatz, Niels & Giesen, Ricardo, 2021. "Designing integrated urban delivery systems using public transport," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    4. Behrend, Moritz & Meisel, Frank & Fagerholt, Kjetil & Andersson, Henrik, 2019. "An exact solution method for the capacitated item-sharing and crowdshipping problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 589-604.
    5. Bathke, Henrik & Hartmann, Evi, 2021. "Accepting a crowdsourced delivery - A choice-based conjoint analysis," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Adapting to the Future: Maritime and City Logistics in the Context of Digitalization and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conf, volume 32, pages 65-95, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    6. Shen, Hui & Lin, Jane, 2020. "Investigation of crowdshipping delivery trip production with real-world data," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    7. Zehtabian, Shohre & Larsen, Christian & Wøhlk, Sanne, 2022. "Estimation of the arrival time of deliveries by occasional drivers in a crowd-shipping setting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 616-632.
    8. J Mingers, 2006. "A critique of statistical modelling in management science from a critical realist perspective: its role within multimethodology," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(2), pages 202-219, February.
    9. Miralles, Francesc & Sieber, Sandra & Valor, Josep, 2005. "CIO herds and user gangs in the adoption of open source software," IESE Research Papers D/595, IESE Business School.
    10. Behrend, Moritz & Meisel, Frank & Fagerholt, Kjetil & Andersson, Henrik, 2021. "A multi-period analysis of the integrated item-sharing and crowdshipping problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 483-499.
    11. Wang, Li & Xu, Min & Qin, Hu, 2023. "Joint optimization of parcel allocation and crowd routing for crowdsourced last-mile delivery," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 111-135.
    12. Marco Bortolini & Francesca Calabrese & Francesco Gabriele Galizia, 2022. "Crowd Logistics: A Survey of Successful Applications and Implementation Potential in Northern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Nils Boysen & Stefan Fedtke & Stefan Schwerdfeger, 2021. "Last-mile delivery concepts: a survey from an operational research perspective," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 1-58, March.
    14. Weerakkody, Vishanth & El-Haddadeh, Ramzi & Sabol, Tomas & Ghoneim, Ahmad & Dzupka, Peter, 2012. "E-government implementation strategies in developed and transition economies: A comparative study," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 66-74.
    15. Oleg Curbatov, 2013. "The 'Knowledge Marketing': A New Trend In A Management Science World," Post-Print hal-01509370, HAL.
    16. van den Broek, Tijs & van Veenstra, Anne Fleur, 2018. "Governance of big data collaborations: How to balance regulatory compliance and disruptive innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 330-338.
    17. Amin Vahidi & Alireza Aliahmad & Ebrahim Teimouri, 2019. "Evolution of Management Cybernetics and Viable System Model," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 297-314, June.
    18. Hanna, Richard & Rohm, Andrew & Crittenden, Victoria L., 2011. "We're all connected: The power of the social media ecosystem," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 265-273, May.
    19. Shixingyue Hu & Yazao Yang, 2024. "Safety of female ride-hailing passengers: Perception and prevention," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Prpić, John & Shukla, Prashant P. & Kietzmann, Jan H. & McCarthy, Ian P., 2015. "How to work a crowd: Developing crowd capital through crowdsourcing," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 77-85.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9699-:d:1515955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.