IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i1p21582440211006683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Confucian Value of Benevolence and Volunteering Among Chinese College Students: The Mediating Role of Functional Motives

Author

Listed:
  • Meiying Guo
  • Hongrui Liu
  • Meilin Yao

Abstract

Previous studies have revealed the influence of cultural values on volunteering; however, few have focused on the Confucian value of benevolence. This study examined the relationship between the Confucian value of benevolence and volunteering, as well as the mediating role of volunteer motives. A total of 473 Chinese college students completed questionnaires to assess the Confucian value of benevolence, including familism, unity, and harmony (UH), six functional motives to volunteer and volunteering. The results revealed a positive relationship between UH and volunteering and the mediating role of functional motives; however, there was no significant association between familism and volunteering. Furthermore, a multigroup analysis suggested that the mediation model was similar across genders among college students. Practical implications and limitations are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Meiying Guo & Hongrui Liu & Meilin Yao, 2021. "The Confucian Value of Benevolence and Volunteering Among Chinese College Students: The Mediating Role of Functional Motives," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:21582440211006683
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440211006683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440211006683
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440211006683?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elsa Kristiansen & Berit Skirstad & Milena M. Parent & Ivan Waddington, 2015. "‘We can do it’: Community, resistance, social solidarity, and long-term volunteering at a sport event," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 256-267, April.
    2. Westaby, James D., 2005. "Behavioral reasoning theory: Identifying new linkages underlying intentions and behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 97-120, November.
    3. Alyssa Bryant Rockenbach & Tara D. Hudson & Jeremy B. Tuchmayer, 2014. "Fostering Meaning, Purpose, and Enduring Commitments to Community Service in College: A Multidimensional Conceptual Model," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 85(3), pages 312-338, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fei Chuan Chen & Yi Hwan Shyr, 2021. "Enhance Volunteering Education Through Overseas Volunteer Service," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    2. Yun Geng & Shannon P. Cheung & Chien-Chung Huang & Jinyu Liao, 2022. "Volunteering among Chinese College Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-15, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Youlin & Qian, Lixian, 2021. "Consumer adoption of electric vehicles in alternative business models," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    2. Yadav, Rambalak & Giri, Arunangshu & Chatterjee, Satakshi, 2022. "Understanding the users' motivation and barriers in adopting healthcare apps: A mixed-method approach using behavioral reasoning theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    3. Hajiheydari, Nastaran & Delgosha, Mohammad Soltani & Olya, Hossein, 2021. "Scepticism and resistance to IoMT in healthcare: Application of behavioural reasoning theory with configurational perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    4. Sanghoon Lee & Eunil Park & Sang Jib Kwon & Angel P. Del Pobil, 2015. "Antecedents of Behavioral Intention to Use Mobile Telecommunication Services: Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility and Technology Acceptance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Elizabeth Kempen & Lorna Christie, 2022. "Designing to Attract in an Emerging Market: Applying Behavioural Reasoning Theory to South African Consumer Reactions to an Ultra-High Temperature Milk Product Line Extension," Journal of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour in Emerging Markets, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 1(14), pages 4-21.
    6. Mahnaz Mansoor & Justin Paul, 2022. "Consumers' choice behavior: An interactive effect of expected eudaimonic well‐being and green altruism," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 94-109, January.
    7. Zafar, Abaid Ullah & Shahzad, Mohsin & Shahzad, Khuram & Appolloni, Andrea & Elgammal, Islam, 2024. "Gamification and sustainable development: Role of gamified learning in sustainable purchasing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    8. Laura Petitta & Tahira M. Probst & Claudio Barbaranelli, 2017. "Safety Culture, Moral Disengagement, and Accident Underreporting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 489-504, March.
    9. Chia-Yen Lin & Wei-Ju Yeh, 2017. "How Does Health-Related Advertising with a Regulatory Focus and Goal Framing Affect Attitudes toward Ads and Healthy Behavior Intentions?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Muhammad Zeeshan Zafar & Adnan Maqbool & Lucian-Ionel Cioca & Syed Ghulam Meran Shah & Shahjahan Masud, 2021. "Accentuating the Interrelation between Consumer Intention and Healthy Packaged Food Selection during COVID-19: A Case Study of Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Eccarius, Timo & Leung, Abraham & Shen, Chung-Wei & Burke, Matthew & Lu, Chung-Cheng, 2021. "Prospects for shared electric velomobility: Profiling potential adopters at a multi-campus university," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    12. Lalicic, Lidija & Weismayer, Christian, 2021. "Consumers’ reasons and perceived value co-creation of using artificial intelligence-enabled travel service agents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 891-901.
    13. Talwar, Shalini & Kaur, Puneet & Yadav, Rambalak & Bilgihan, Anil & Dhir, Amandeep, 2021. "What drives diners' eco-friendly behaviour? The moderating role of planning routine," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    14. Kihyung Kim & Sang-Lin Han & Young-Yong Jang & Yun-Chang Shin, 2020. "The Effects of the Antecedents of “Buy-Online-Pick-Up-In-Store” Service on Consumer’s BOPIS Choice Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-15, November.
    15. Kristína Pompurová & Radka Marčeková & Ľubica Šebová & Jana Sokolová & Matej Žofaj, 2018. "Volunteer Tourism as a Sustainable Form of Tourism—The Case of Organized Events," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.
    16. Liang, Jyun-Kai & Eccarius, Timo & Lu, Chung-Cheng, 2019. "Investigating factors that affect the intention to use shared parking: A case study of Taipei City," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 799-812.
    17. K. D. V. Prasad & Tanmoy De, 2024. "Generative AI as a catalyst for HRM practices: mediating effects of trust," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Jan, Ihsan Ullah & Ji, Seonggoo & Kim, Changju, 2023. "What (de) motivates customers to use AI-powered conversational agents for shopping? The extended behavioral reasoning perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    19. Belaïd, Fateh & Flambard, Véronique, 2024. "Ecological-behavioral economics: Impact of information on energy-renovation decision through third-party investing," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    20. Delgosha, Mohammad Soltani & Hajiheydari, Nastaran, 2020. "On-demand service platforms pro/anti adoption cognition: Examining the context-specific reasons," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 180-194.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:21582440211006683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.