IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v11y2024i1d10.1057_s41599-024-03842-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generative AI as a catalyst for HRM practices: mediating effects of trust

Author

Listed:
  • K. D. V. Prasad

    (Symbiosis Institute of Business Management (SIBM)
    Symbiosis International (Deemed University))

  • Tanmoy De

    (Symbiosis Institute of Business Management (SIBM)
    Symbiosis International (Deemed University))

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of generative AI tools on human resource management practices, organizational commitment, employee engagement, and employee performance. The authors also investigated the mediating role of trust in the relationship between user perception and organizational commitment. A structured questionnaire was used to collect the data from the information technology industry employees to measure the 9 reflective constructs optimism, innovativeness, ease of use, usefulness, trust, organizational commitment, vigor, dedication, and employee performance. Two constructs, ease of use and usefulness, are modeled as a higher-order construct – User Perception, whereas vigor and Dedication are modeled as another higher-order construct, Employee Engagement. The mode-fit indices were assessed for both the higher- and lower-order constructs, and the model-fit indices for both the models, higher- and lower-order constructs reveal an excellent model fit. Positive and statistically significant impacts were observed between the study constructs. The impact of organizational commitment on employee engagement was positive and statistically significant, and in turn, the impact of employee engagement on employee performance was also positive and statistically significant. Trust partially mediated the relationship between user perception and organizational commitment, fostering enhanced employee engagement and performance. The theories of technology readiness, stimulus-organization-response, and technology acceptance model were utilized in the development of the study’s theoretical framework, which provided fresh perspectives on how employee engagement, organizational commitment, and performance are influenced by user experience and trust in the context of generative AI. Theoretically, it opens up new applications such as personalized education and services, digital art, and realistic virtual assistants that were previously unfeasible or impractical for automation. The practical implications are that the field of interdisciplinary research as well as the information technology industry will be greatly impacted by generative AI. To facilitate swift adoption, the principles of generative AI are conceptualized from model-, system-, and application-level perspectives in addition to a social-technical perspective, where they are explicated and defined. In the end, our research has given future scholars a significant research agenda that will enable them to study generative AI from different theoretical perspectives while incorporating the concepts from these theories.

Suggested Citation

  • K. D. V. Prasad & Tanmoy De, 2024. "Generative AI as a catalyst for HRM practices: mediating effects of trust," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03842-4
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-03842-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-03842-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-03842-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Fernández, Gastón P. & Rammer, Christian, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and firm-level productivity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 188-205.
    2. Prentice, Catherine & Wong, IpKin Anthony & Lin, Zhiwei (CJ), 2023. "Artificial intelligence as a boundary-crossing object for employee engagement and performance," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    3. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    4. Westaby, James D., 2005. "Behavioral reasoning theory: Identifying new linkages underlying intentions and behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 97-120, November.
    5. Ledyard Tucker & Charles Lewis, 1973. "A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(1), pages 1-10, March.
    6. Ivanov, Stanislav & Soliman, Mohammad & Tuomi, Aarni & Alkathiri, Nasser Alhamar & Al-Alawi, Alamir N., 2024. "Drivers of generative AI adoption in higher education through the lens of the Theory of Planned Behaviour," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    7. Babina, Tania & Fedyk, Anastassia & He, Alex & Hodson, James, 2024. "Artificial intelligence, firm growth, and product innovation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    8. Rongbin Yang & Santoso Wibowo, 2022. "User trust in artificial intelligence: A comprehensive conceptual framework," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2053-2077, December.
    9. Rabindra Kumar Pradhan & Lalatendu Kesari Jena, 2017. "Employee Performance at Workplace: Conceptual Model and Empirical Validation," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 5(1), pages 69-85, January.
    10. Braganza, Ashley & Chen, Weifeng & Canhoto, Ana & Sap, Serap, 2021. "Productive employment and decent work: The impact of AI adoption on psychological contracts, job engagement and employee trust," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 485-494.
    11. Siliang Tong & Nan Jia & Xueming Luo & Zheng Fang, 2021. "The Janus face of artificial intelligence feedback: Deployment versus disclosure effects on employee performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(9), pages 1600-1631, September.
    12. Allen, Natalie J. & Meyer, John P., 1993. "Organizational commitment: Evidence of career stage effects?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 49-61, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hajiheydari, Nastaran & Delgosha, Mohammad Soltani & Olya, Hossein, 2021. "Scepticism and resistance to IoMT in healthcare: Application of behavioural reasoning theory with configurational perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    2. Fossen, Frank M. & McLemore, Trevor & Sorgner, Alina, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence and Entrepreneurship," IZA Discussion Papers 17055, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Rabindra Kumar Pradhan & Madhusmita Panda, 2021. "Human Resource Empowerment: Development and Validation of a Measurement Tool," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 22(4), pages 1019-1037, August.
    4. Chen, Ching-Fu & Eccarius, Timo & Su, Pin-Chi, 2021. "The role of environmental concern in forming intentions for switching to electric scooters," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 129-144.
    5. Saam Marianne, 2024. "The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Productivity and Employment – How Can We Assess It and What Can We Observe?," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Sciendo, vol. 59(1), pages 22-27, February.
    6. Eccarius, Timo & Leung, Abraham & Shen, Chung-Wei & Burke, Matthew & Lu, Chung-Cheng, 2021. "Prospects for shared electric velomobility: Profiling potential adopters at a multi-campus university," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    7. Armenia, Stefano & Franco, Eduardo & Iandolo, Francesca & Maielli, Giuliano & Vito, Pietro, 2024. "Zooming in and out the landscape: Artificial intelligence and system dynamics in business and management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    8. Russell L. Purvis & V. Sambamurthy & Robert W. Zmud, 2001. "The Assimilation of Knowledge Platforms in Organizations: An Empirical Investigation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 117-135, April.
    9. Alessia Lo Turco & Alessandro Sterlacchini, 2024. "Factors Enhancing Ai Adoption By Firms. Evidence From France," Working Papers 486, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    10. August Francesc Corrons Giménez & Lluís Garay Tamajón, 2019. "An Analysis of the Process of Adopting Local Digital Currencies in Support of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Mourelatos, Evangelos & Zervas, Panagiotis & Lagios, Dimitris & Tzimas, Giannis, 2024. "Can AI Bridge the Gender Gap in Competitiveness?," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1404, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    12. Francesca Bonetti & Matteo Montecchi & Kirk Plangger & Hope Jensen Schau, 2023. "Practice co-evolution: Collaboratively embedding artificial intelligence in retail practices," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 867-888, July.
    13. Aziz Barhmi & Omar Hajaji, 2023. "Multidisciplinary Approach to Supply Chain Resilience: Conceptualization and Scale Development," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(5), pages 43-69.
    14. Venugopal Gopalakrishna-Remani & Robert Paul Jones & Kerri M. Camp, 2019. "Levels of EMR Adoption in U.S. Hospitals: An Empirical Examination of Absorptive Capacity, Institutional Pressures, Top Management Beliefs, and Participation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1325-1344, December.
    15. Elbanna, Amany & Newman, Mike, 2022. "The bright side and the dark side of top management support in Digital Transformaion –A hermeneutical reading," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    16. Morosan, Cristian, 2016. "An empirical examination of U.S. travelers’ intentions to use biometric e-gates in airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 120-128.
    17. Nuanphromsakul, Kajohnjak & Szczepańska-Woszczyna, Katarzyna & Kot, Sebastian & Chaveesuk, Singha & Chaiyasoonthorn, Wornchanok, 2022. "Sustainability of Rubber Farmers Cooperatives: Empirical Evaluation of Determining Factors," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 14(4), December.
    18. Huang, Youlin & Qian, Lixian, 2021. "Consumer adoption of electric vehicles in alternative business models," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    19. Mark Shevlin & David Boyda & James Houston & Jamie Murphy, 2015. "Measurement of the psychosis continuum: Modelling the frequency and distress of subclinical psychotic experiences," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 108-118, April.
    20. Sarv Devaraj & Robert F. Easley & J. Michael Crant, 2008. "Research Note ---How Does Personality Matter? Relating the Five-Factor Model to Technology Acceptance and Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 93-105, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03842-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.