IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v10y2020i1p2158244020914573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Young Adult Perceptions of Internet Communications and the Grooming Concept

Author

Listed:
  • Amy C. Wood
  • Jacqueline M. Wheatcroft

Abstract

Research of young people shows a lack of understanding of the term grooming in online communications and that internet risks are taken because internet literacy is poor for this group. However, limited research has investigated the perceptions of young adults in this context. The aim of this study was to understand young adults’ perceptions of risk, their internet behaviors, and understanding of the grooming concept. Furthermore, to understand the types of risk behaviors young people engage in online, whether they perceive these behaviors as risky, and what implications this has for vulnerability to negative experiences. An examination of internet communication perceptions and the grooming concept focused on 10 young males and females aged between 18 and 23 years. Semi-structured interviews were conducted at open access youth organizations in the North West of England, UK, and the duration of each interview was approximately 30 min. The data were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. Emergent themes were (a) grooming as a concept, (b) virtual lives, and (c) perception of risk. The findings concur there is limited understanding of the term grooming but that explanations may not be simply confined to literacy. Risks being taken online were not always perceived as risky. Recommendations include the need for a more nuanced definition of the term grooming and that more information is available to children and caregivers. Further work should focus on younger participants’ perceptions of grooming to address wider issues, together with a focus on risk taking behaviors among other vulnerable groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Amy C. Wood & Jacqueline M. Wheatcroft, 2020. "Young Adult Perceptions of Internet Communications and the Grooming Concept," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440209, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:2158244020914573
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244020914573
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244020914573
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244020914573?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sonia Livingstone, 2008. "Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27072, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elisabeth Staksrud & Kjartan Ólafsson & Sonia Livingstone, 2013. "Does the use of social networking sites increase children’s risk of harm?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 45016, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Laura Lucia-Palacios & Victoria Bordonoba-Juste & Raúl Pérez-López, 2021. "Consumer-to-consumer reselling adoption among European countries: differences between old and young millennials," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 15(2), pages 253-279, June.
    3. Montgomery, Kathryn C., 2015. "Youth and surveillance in the Facebook era: Policy interventions and social implications," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 771-786.
    4. Tamara Shepherd, 2012. "Persona rights for user-generated content: a normative framework for privacy and intellectual property regulation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 59450, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Van Royen, Kathleen & Poels, Karolien & Vandebosch, Heidi, 2016. "Harmonizing freedom and protection: Adolescents' voices on automatic monitoring of social networking sites," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 35-41.
    6. Daria J. Kuss & Mark D. Griffiths, 2011. "Online Social Networking and Addiction—A Review of the Psychological Literature," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-25, August.
    7. Joyce Vissenberg & Leen d'Haenens, 2020. "Protecting Youths’ Wellbeing Online: Studying the Associations between Opportunities, Risks, and Resilience," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 175-184.
    8. Omar A. Alismaiel, 2023. "Digital Media Used in Education: The Influence on Cyberbullying Behaviors among Youth Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Aditi Khodke & Atsushi Watabe & Nigel Mehdi, 2021. "Implementation of Accelerated Policy-Driven Sustainability Transitions: Case of Bharat Stage 4 to 6 Leapfrogs in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, April.
    10. Hanna Krasnova & Thomas Widjaja & Peter Buxmann & Helena Wenninger & Izak Benbasat, 2015. "Research Note—Why Following Friends Can Hurt You: An Exploratory Investigation of the Effects of Envy on Social Networking Sites among College-Age Users," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 585-605, September.
    11. Liu, Xinyan & Wang, Lu & Liu, Xiaowen & Zhai, Xiuxiu, 2024. "The impact of privacy violations on subsequent consumer preferences for anthropomorphized products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    12. Jung, Yoonhyuk & Park, Jonghwa, 2018. "An investigation of relationships among privacy concerns, affective responses, and coping behaviors in location-based services," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 15-24.
    13. Kim, Hakkyun & Lee, Kyoungmi & Park, Kiwan, 2015. "Balancing out feelings of risk by playing it safe: The effect of social networking on subsequent risk judgment," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 121-131.
    14. Agapito, Dora & Brito, Pedro Q., 2020. "A Dyadic Approach To Adolescents’ Risky Online Behaviors," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 8(3), pages 244-267.
    15. Malissa Maria Mahmud & Shiau Foong Wong, 2021. "Social Media Blueprints: A Study of Self-Representation and Identity Management," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 11(6), pages 286-299, June.
    16. Francisco Javier Ballesta Pagán & Josefina Lozano Martínez & Mari Carmen Cerezo Máiquez, 2018. "Internet Use by Secondary School Students: A Digital Divide in Sustainable Societies?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    17. Denise E. Agosto & June Abbas & Robin Naughton, 2012. "Relationships and social rules: Teens’ social network and other ICT selection practices," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(6), pages 1108-1124, June.
    18. Ellen Helsper & Monica M. Gerber, 2012. "The plausibility of cross-national comparisons of internet use types," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 42956, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Mª Victoria Bordonaba-Juste & Laura Lucia-Palacios & Raúl Pérez-López, 2020. "Generational differences in valuing usefulness, privacy and security negative experiences for paying for cloud services," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 35-60, March.
    20. Prasanta Bhattacharya & Tuan Q. Phan & Xue Bai & Edoardo M. Airoldi, 2019. "A Coevolution Model of Network Structure and User Behavior: The Case of Content Generation in Online Social Networks," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 117-132, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:2158244020914573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.