IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i8p4830-d796065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Artificial Intelligence News Source Credibility Identification System on Effectiveness of Media Literacy Education

Author

Listed:
  • Tosti H. C. Chiang

    (Graduate Institute of Mass Communication, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

  • Chih-Shan Liao

    (Graduate Institute of Mass Communication, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

  • Wei-Ching Wang

    (Graduate Institute of Mass Communication, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

Abstract

During presidential elections and showbusiness or social news events, society has begun to address the risk of fake news. The Sustainable Development Goals 4 for Global Education Agenda aims to “ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all” by 2030. As a result, various nations have deemed media literacy education a required competence in order for audiences to maintain a discerning attitude and to verify messages rather than automatically believing them. This study developed a highly efficient message discrimination method using new technology using artificial intelligence and big data information processing containing general news and content farm message data on approximately 938,000 articles. Deep neural network technology was used to create a news source credibility identification system. Media literacy was the core of the experimental course design. Two groups of participants used different methods to perform message discrimination. The results revealed that the system significantly expanded the participants’ knowledge of media literacy. The system positively affected the participants’ attitude, confidence, and motivation towards media literacy learning. This research provides a method of identifying fake news in order to ensure that audiences are not affected by fake messages, thereby helping to maintain a democratic society.

Suggested Citation

  • Tosti H. C. Chiang & Chih-Shan Liao & Wei-Ching Wang, 2022. "Impact of Artificial Intelligence News Source Credibility Identification System on Effectiveness of Media Literacy Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4830-:d:796065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4830/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4830/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sonia Livingstone, 2008. "Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27072, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elisabeth Staksrud & Kjartan Ólafsson & Sonia Livingstone, 2013. "Does the use of social networking sites increase children’s risk of harm?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 45016, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Malissa Maria Mahmud & Shiau Foong Wong, 2021. "Social Media Blueprints: A Study of Self-Representation and Identity Management," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 11(6), pages 286-299, June.
    3. Francisco Javier Ballesta Pagán & Josefina Lozano Martínez & Mari Carmen Cerezo Máiquez, 2018. "Internet Use by Secondary School Students: A Digital Divide in Sustainable Societies?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Denise E. Agosto & June Abbas & Robin Naughton, 2012. "Relationships and social rules: Teens’ social network and other ICT selection practices," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(6), pages 1108-1124, June.
    5. Ellen Helsper & Monica M. Gerber, 2012. "The plausibility of cross-national comparisons of internet use types," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 42956, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Mª Victoria Bordonaba-Juste & Laura Lucia-Palacios & Raúl Pérez-López, 2020. "Generational differences in valuing usefulness, privacy and security negative experiences for paying for cloud services," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 35-60, March.
    7. Prasanta Bhattacharya & Tuan Q. Phan & Xue Bai & Edoardo M. Airoldi, 2019. "A Coevolution Model of Network Structure and User Behavior: The Case of Content Generation in Online Social Networks," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 117-132, March.
    8. Laura Lucia-Palacios & Victoria Bordonoba-Juste & Raúl Pérez-López, 2021. "Consumer-to-consumer reselling adoption among European countries: differences between old and young millennials," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 15(2), pages 253-279, June.
    9. Montgomery, Kathryn C., 2015. "Youth and surveillance in the Facebook era: Policy interventions and social implications," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 771-786.
    10. Ash Watson & Deborah Lupton, 2022. "What Happens Next? Using the Story Completion Method to Surface the Affects and Materialities of Digital Privacy Dilemmas," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(3), pages 690-706, September.
    11. Tamara Shepherd, 2012. "Persona rights for user-generated content: a normative framework for privacy and intellectual property regulation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 59450, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Sonia Livingstone & Jessica Mason, 2015. "Sexual rights and sexual risks among youth online: a review of existing knowledge regarding childrenand young people’s developing sexuality in relationto new media environments," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64567, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Sonia Livingstone & Anke Görzig, 2014. "When adolescents receive sexual messages on the internet: explaining experiences of risk and harm," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 55630, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Gila Cohen Zilka & Chen Goldberg, 2021. "Watching of Scary TV Shows by Children and Youth, Identification With Characters, and Resulting Fears and Nightmares," Review of European Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(1), pages 1-1, March.
    15. Van Royen, Kathleen & Poels, Karolien & Vandebosch, Heidi, 2016. "Harmonizing freedom and protection: Adolescents' voices on automatic monitoring of social networking sites," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 35-41.
    16. Ellen Helsper, 2014. "Offline social identity and online chat partner selection," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 51116, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Daria J. Kuss & Mark D. Griffiths, 2011. "Online Social Networking and Addiction—A Review of the Psychological Literature," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-25, August.
    18. Joyce Vissenberg & Leen d'Haenens, 2020. "Protecting Youths’ Wellbeing Online: Studying the Associations between Opportunities, Risks, and Resilience," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 175-184.
    19. Hector Gonzalez-Jimenez, 2017. "The self-concept life cycle and brand perceptions: An interdisciplinary perspective," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 7(1), pages 67-84, June.
    20. Omar A. Alismaiel, 2023. "Digital Media Used in Education: The Influence on Cyberbullying Behaviors among Youth Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4830-:d:796065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.