IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v64y2016icp35-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Harmonizing freedom and protection: Adolescents' voices on automatic monitoring of social networking sites

Author

Listed:
  • Van Royen, Kathleen
  • Poels, Karolien
  • Vandebosch, Heidi

Abstract

Automatic monitoring of user-generated content on social networking sites (SNSs) aims at detecting potential harm for adolescents by means of text and image mining techniques and subsequent actions by the providers (e.g. blocking users, legal action). Evidently, current research is primarily focused on its technological development. However, involving adolescents' voices regarding the desirability of this monitoring is important; particularly because automatic monitoring might invade adolescents' privacy and freedom, and consequently evoke reactance. In this study, fourteen focus groups were conducted with adolescents (N=66) between 12 and 18years old. The goal was to obtain insights into adolescents' opinions on desirability and priorities for automatically detecting harmful content on SNSs. Opinions reflect the contention between a need for protection online versus the preservation of freedom. Most adolescents in this study are in favour of automatic monitoring for situations they perceive as uncontrollable or that they cannot solve themselves. Clear priorities for detection must be set in order to ensure the privacy and autonomy of adolescents. Moreover, monitoring actions aiming at the prevention of harm are required.

Suggested Citation

  • Van Royen, Kathleen & Poels, Karolien & Vandebosch, Heidi, 2016. "Harmonizing freedom and protection: Adolescents' voices on automatic monitoring of social networking sites," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 35-41.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:64:y:2016:i:c:p:35-41
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.02.024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740916300585
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.02.024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mishna, Faye & Saini, Michael & Solomon, Steven, 2009. "Ongoing and online: Children and youth's perceptions of cyber bullying," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 1222-1228, December.
    2. Sonia Livingstone, 2008. "Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27072, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Sonia Livingstone & Anke Görzig, 2014. "When adolescents receive sexual messages on the internet: explaining experiences of risk and harm," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 55630, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Elisabeth Staksrud & Kjartan Ólafsson & Sonia Livingstone, 2013. "Does the use of social networking sites increase children’s risk of harm?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 45016, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Giovanna Mascheroni & Kjartan Ólafsson, 2014. "Net Children Go Mobile: risks and opportunities," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 55798, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Biernesser, Candice & Sewall, Craig J.R. & Brent, David & Bear, Todd & Mair, Christina & Trauth, Jeanette, 2020. "Social media use and deliberate self-harm among youth: A systematized narrative review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    2. Cynthia Van Hee & Gilles Jacobs & Chris Emmery & Bart Desmet & Els Lefever & Ben Verhoeven & Guy De Pauw & Walter Daelemans & Véronique Hoste, 2018. "Automatic detection of cyberbullying in social media text," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ethel Quayle, 2016. "Researching online child sexual exploitation and abuse: are there links between online and offline vulnerabilities?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 71260, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Park, Sora & Na, Eun-Yeong & Kim, Eun-mee, 2014. "The relationship between online activities, netiquette and cyberbullying," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 74-81.
    3. Sonia Livingstone & Jessica Mason, 2015. "Sexual rights and sexual risks among youth online: a review of existing knowledge regarding childrenand young people’s developing sexuality in relationto new media environments," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64567, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Shuhuan Zhou, 2021. "Status and Risk Factors of Chinese Teenagers’ Exposure to Cyberbullying," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    5. Mary Callaghan & Colette Kelly & Michal Molcho, 2015. "Exploring traditional and cyberbullying among Irish adolescents," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 60(2), pages 199-206, February.
    6. Eliot Simangunsong, 2020. "Cyberbullying: Identification Of Factors Affecting The Quality Of Higher Education In Indonesia," Education, Sustainability & Society (ESS), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 3(1), pages 15-19, January.
    7. Sebastian Wachs & Juan Manuel Machimbarrena & Michelle F. Wright & Manuel Gámez-Guadix & Soeun Yang & Ruthaychonnee Sittichai & Ritu Singh & Ramakrishna Biswal & Katerina Flora & Vassiliki Daskalou & , 2022. "Associations between Coping Strategies and Cyberhate Involvement: Evidence from Adolescents across Three World Regions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Elisabeth Staksrud & Kjartan Ólafsson & Sonia Livingstone, 2013. "Does the use of social networking sites increase children’s risk of harm?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 45016, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. McCoy,Selina & Lyons,Seán & Coyne,Bryan & Darmody,Merike, 2017. "Teaching and Learning in Second- Level Schools at the Advent of High-Speed Broadband," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS51.
    10. Malissa Maria Mahmud & Shiau Foong Wong, 2021. "Social Media Blueprints: A Study of Self-Representation and Identity Management," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 11(6), pages 286-299, June.
    11. Francisco Javier Ballesta Pagán & Josefina Lozano Martínez & Mari Carmen Cerezo Máiquez, 2018. "Internet Use by Secondary School Students: A Digital Divide in Sustainable Societies?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    12. Teo Keipi & Atte Oksanen & James Hawdon & Matti Näsi & Pekka Räsänen, 2017. "Harm-advocating online content and subjective well-being: a cross-national study of new risks faced by youth," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 634-649, May.
    13. Giovanna Mascheroni & Jane Vincent, 2016. "Perpetual contact as a communicative affordance: opportunities, constraints, and emotions," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 66938, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Kyung Im Kang & Kyonghwa Kang & Chanhee Kim, 2021. "Risk Factors Influencing Cyberbullying Perpetration among Middle School Students in Korea: Analysis Using the Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Regression Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-12, February.
    15. Claire Dorris & Karen Winter & Liam O'Hare & Edda Tandi Lwoga, 2024. "Mobile device use in the primary school classroom and impact on pupil literacy and numeracy attainment: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), June.
    16. Denise E. Agosto & June Abbas & Robin Naughton, 2012. "Relationships and social rules: Teens’ social network and other ICT selection practices," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(6), pages 1108-1124, June.
    17. Ellen Helsper & Monica M. Gerber, 2012. "The plausibility of cross-national comparisons of internet use types," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 42956, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Joris Van Ouytsel & Michel Walrave & Mónica Ojeda & Rosario Del Rey & Koen Ponnet, 2020. "Adolescents’ Sexy Self-Presentation on Instagram: An Investigation of Their Posting Behavior Using a Prototype Willingness Model Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-15, November.
    19. Mª Victoria Bordonaba-Juste & Laura Lucia-Palacios & Raúl Pérez-López, 2020. "Generational differences in valuing usefulness, privacy and security negative experiences for paying for cloud services," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 35-60, March.
    20. Prasanta Bhattacharya & Tuan Q. Phan & Xue Bai & Edoardo M. Airoldi, 2019. "A Coevolution Model of Network Structure and User Behavior: The Case of Content Generation in Online Social Networks," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 117-132, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:64:y:2016:i:c:p:35-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.