IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v236y2022i3p458-476.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A novel structural safety assessment method of large liquid tank based on the belief rule base and finite element method

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan Chen
  • Zhijie Zhou
  • Lihao Yang
  • Guanyu Hu
  • Xiaoxia Han
  • Shuaiwen Tang

Abstract

The structural safety assessment of large liquid tanks (LLT) has attracted an extensive attention. As a typical gray box model, the belief rule base (BRB) model can handle qualitative information and quantitative data simultaneously, which is a suitable modeling tool for structural safety assessment. However, it is difficult to establish and train the BRB model when there is a lack of expert experience and fault samples of LLT. Therefore, a novel safety assessment model for LLT based on BRB and finite element method (FEM-BRB) is proposed in this paper. The FEM is introduced to construct the BRB model by combining expert knowledge and industry standards for the first time, which can effectively compensate for the lack of expert experience. The fault samples are generated in the mechanism simulation model under different working conditions. Based on the fault samples generated by the FEM and historical samples, the projection covariance matrix adaption evolution strategy (P-CMA-ES) optimization algorithm is then used to train the model, which further improves the structural safety assessment accuracy when lacking fault samples. A case study of three actual oil tanks in a coastal port is conducted to illustrate the effectiveness and advantage of the developed structural safety assessment method.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan Chen & Zhijie Zhou & Lihao Yang & Guanyu Hu & Xiaoxia Han & Shuaiwen Tang, 2022. "A novel structural safety assessment method of large liquid tank based on the belief rule base and finite element method," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(3), pages 458-476, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:236:y:2022:i:3:p:458-476
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X211021690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X211021690
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X211021690?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vema, Vamsikrishna & Sudheer, K.P. & Chaubey, I., 2019. "Fuzzy inference system for site suitability evaluation of water harvesting structures in rainfed regions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 82-93.
    2. Yang, Yunfeng & Chen, Guohua & Reniers, Genserik, 2020. "Vulnerability assessment of atmospheric storage tanks to floods based on logistic regression," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Hänninen, Maria & Kujala, Pentti, 2012. "Influences of variables on ship collision probability in a Bayesian belief network model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 27-40.
    4. Bernier, Carl & Padgett, Jamie E., 2019. "Fragility and risk assessment of aboveground storage tanks subjected to concurrent surge, wave, and wind loads," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Feng, Zhichao & Zhou, Zhijie & Hu, Changhua & Ban, Xiaojun & Hu, Guanyu, 2020. "A safety assessment model based on belief rule base with new optimization method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    6. Olivar, Oscar J. Ramírez & Mayorga, Santiago Zuluaga & Giraldo, Felipe Muñoz & Sánchez-Silva, Mauricio & Pinelli, Jean-Paul & Salzano, Ernesto, 2020. "The effects of extreme winds on atmospheric storage tanks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    7. Kong, Guilan & Xu, Dong-Ling & Body, Richard & Yang, Jian-Bo & Mackway-Jones, Kevin & Carley, Simon, 2012. "A belief rule-based decision support system for clinical risk assessment of cardiac chest pain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 564-573.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rossi, Lorenzo & Casson Moreno, Valeria & Landucci, Gabriele, 2022. "Vulnerability assessment of process pipelines affected by flood events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    2. Misuri, Alessio & Landucci, Gabriele & Cozzani, Valerio, 2021. "Assessment of risk modification due to safety barrier performance degradation in Natech events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    3. Hai-Long Zhu & Shan-Shan Liu & Yuan-Yuan Qu & Xiao-Xia Han & Wei He & You Cao, 2022. "A new risk assessment method based on belief rule base and fault tree analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(3), pages 420-438, June.
    4. Misuri, Alessio & Ricci, Federica & Sorichetti, Riccardo & Cozzani, Valerio, 2023. "The Effect of Safety Barrier Degradation on the Severity of Primary Natech Scenarios," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    5. Caratozzolo, Vincenzo & Misuri, Alessio & Cozzani, Valerio, 2022. "A generalized equipment vulnerability model for the quantitative risk assessment of horizontal vessels involved in Natech scenarios triggered by floods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    6. Marroni, Giulia & Casini, Leonardo & Bartolucci, Andrea & Kuipers, Sanneke & Casson Moreno, Valeria & Landucci, Gabriele, 2024. "Development of fragility models for process equipment affected by physical security attacks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    7. Khakzad, Nima & Cozzani, Valerio, 2020. "Special issue: Quantitative assessment and risk management of Natech accidents," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    8. Kishore, Katchalla Bala & Gangolu, Jaswanth & Ramancha, Mukesh K. & Bhuyan, Kasturi & Sharma, Hrishikesh, 2022. "Performance-based probabilistic deflection capacity models and fragility estimation for reinforced concrete column and beam subjected to blast loading," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    9. Yang, Zhisen & Yang, Zaili & Yin, Jingbo, 2018. "Realising advanced risk-based port state control inspection using data-driven Bayesian networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 38-56.
    10. Li, Huanhuan & Çelik, Cihad & Bashir, Musa & Zou, Lu & Yang, Zaili, 2024. "Incorporation of a global perspective into data-driven analysis of maritime collision accident risk," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    11. Al-Ebbini, Lina & Oztekin, Asil & Chen, Yao, 2016. "FLAS: Fuzzy lung allocation system for US-based transplantations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 1051-1065.
    12. Sotiralis, P. & Ventikos, N.P. & Hamann, R. & Golyshev, P. & Teixeira, A.P., 2016. "Incorporation of human factors into ship collision risk models focusing on human centred design aspects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 210-227.
    13. Guizhen Zhang & Vinh V. Thai & Adrian Wing‐Keung Law & Kum Fai Yuen & Hui Shan Loh & Qingji Zhou, 2020. "Quantitative Risk Assessment of Seafarers’ Nonfatal Injuries Due to Occupational Accidents Based on Bayesian Network Modeling," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(1), pages 8-23, January.
    14. Bing Wu & Huibin Tian & Xinping Yan & C. Guedes Soares, 2020. "A probabilistic consequence estimation model for collision accidents in the downstream of Yangtze River using Bayesian Networks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(2), pages 422-436, April.
    15. Weiliang Qiao & Yu Liu & Xiaoxue Ma & Yang Liu, 2020. "Human Factors Analysis for Maritime Accidents Based on a Dynamic Fuzzy Bayesian Network," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(5), pages 957-980, May.
    16. Lian, Zheng & Zhou, Zhi-Jie & Hu, Chang-Hua & Wang, Jie & Zhang, Chun-Chao & Zhang, Chao-Li, 2024. "A health assessment method with attribute importance modeling for complex systems using belief rule base," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    17. Hu, Xiaonong & Fang, Genshen & Yang, Jiayu & Zhao, Lin & Ge, Yaojun, 2023. "Simplified models for uncertainty quantification of extreme events using Monte Carlo technique," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    18. Çakır, Erkan & Fışkın, Remzi & Sevgili, Coşkan, 2021. "Investigation of tugboat accidents severity: An application of association rule mining algorithms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    19. Yang, Zaili & Yang, Zhisen & Smith, John & Robert, Bostock Adam Peter, 2021. "Risk analysis of bicycle accidents: A Bayesian approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    20. Szlapczynski, Rafal & Szlapczynska, Joanna, 2021. "A ship domain-based model of collision risk for near-miss detection and Collision Alert Systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:236:y:2022:i:3:p:458-476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.