IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v226y2012i3p318-326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Burn-in via shocks for avoiding large risks

Author

Listed:
  • J H Cha
  • M Finkelstein

Abstract

Burn-in is usually performed for items that have decreasing or bathtub failure rates in order to eliminate early failures. This can be done in either the normal environment or an accelerated environment that uses high environmental stresses, which are often referred to as shocks. Mixtures of distributions present a useful survival model for lifetime distributions in heterogeneous populations. They often result in decreasing failure rates in some time intervals, which can often justify the implementation of the burn-in procedure. This paper considers shocks that eliminate weak items in heterogeneous populations. It is assumed that a larger failure rate of an item corresponds to a larger probability of this elimination. Approaches are developed that can help to minimize the risks of selecting items with large levels of individual failure rates for missions of high importance, where failures can result in substantial economic losses. The optimal burn-in time which minimizes average losses for different criteria is considered using simple examples.

Suggested Citation

  • J H Cha & M Finkelstein, 2012. "Burn-in via shocks for avoiding large risks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 226(3), pages 318-326, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:226:y:2012:i:3:p:318-326
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X11422183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X11422183
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X11422183?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maxim Finkelstein, 2008. "Failure Rate Modelling for Reliability and Risk," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, number 978-1-84800-986-8, March.
    2. Cha, Ji Hwan & Finkelstein, Maxim, 2010. "Burn-in by environmental shocks for two ordered subpopulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 111-117, October.
    3. Jie Mi, 1996. "Minimizing Some Cost Functions Related to Both Burn-In and Field Use," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(3), pages 497-500, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cha, Ji Hwan & Pulcini, Gianpaolo, 2016. "Optimal burn-in procedure for mixed populations based on the device degradation process history," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 988-998.
    2. Cha, Ji Hwan & Finkelstein, Maxim, 2011. "Burn-in and the performance quality measures in heterogeneous populations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(2), pages 273-280, April.
    3. Cha, Ji Hwan & Finkelstein, Maxim, 2015. "Environmental stress screening modelling, analysis and optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 149-155.
    4. Cha, Ji Hwan & Finkelstein, Maxim, 2013. "The failure rate dynamics in heterogeneous populations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 120-128.
    5. Ji Cha & Maxim S. Finkelstein, 2009. "Stochastically ordered subpopulations and optimal burn-in procedure," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2009-030, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    6. M Shafiee & M Finkelstein & S Chukova, 2011. "Burn-in and imperfect preventive maintenance strategies for warranted products," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(2), pages 211-218, June.
    7. Cha, Ji Hwan & Finkelstein, Maxim, 2016. "New shock models based on the generalized Polya process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(1), pages 135-141.
    8. Zhi-Sheng Ye & Loon-Ching Tang & Min Xie, 2014. "Bi-objective burn-in modeling and optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 212(1), pages 201-214, January.
    9. Cha, Ji Hwan & Finkelstein, Maxim, 2010. "Burn-in by environmental shocks for two ordered subpopulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 111-117, October.
    10. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim & Dai, Yuanshun, 2020. "Mission abort policy optimization for series systems with overlapping primary and rescue subsystems operating in a random environment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    11. Maxim S. Finkelstein, 2008. "On systems with shared resources and optimal switching strategies," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2008-025, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    12. Montoro-Cazorla, Delia & Pérez-Ocón, Rafael, 2018. "Constructing a Markov process for modelling a reliability system under multiple failures and replacements," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 34-47.
    13. Ji Hwan Cha & Maxim Finkelstein, 2020. "On optimal life extension for degrading systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(3), pages 487-495, June.
    14. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim, 2018. "Optimal mission abort policy for systems in a random environment with variable shock rate," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 11-17.
    15. Maxim Finkelstein & Ji Hwan Cha, 2022. "Reducing degradation and age of items in imperfect repair modeling," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(4), pages 1058-1081, December.
    16. Anders S. G. Andrae & Mengjun Xia & Jianli Zhang & Xiaoming Tang, 2016. "Practical Eco-Design and Eco-Innovation of Consumer Electronics—the Case of Mobile Phones," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-19, February.
    17. Ji Hwan Cha & Maxim Finkelstein, 2020. "Is perfect repair always perfect?," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(1), pages 90-104, March.
    18. Wang, Xiaolin & Li, Lishuai & Xie, Min, 2020. "An unpunctual preventive maintenance policy under two-dimensional warranty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 304-318.
    19. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim & Dai, Yuanshun, 2018. "Mission abort policy balancing the uncompleted mission penalty and system loss risk," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 194-201.
    20. Ting Li & James Anderson, 2013. "Shaping human mortality patterns through intrinsic and extrinsic vitality processes," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 28(12), pages 341-372.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:226:y:2012:i:3:p:318-326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.