IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v226y2012i3p295-304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability analysis of series systems with multiple failure modes under epistemic and aleatory uncertainties

Author

Listed:
  • N-C Xiao
  • H-Z Huang
  • Z Wang
  • Y Li
  • Y Liu

Abstract

Uncertainty exists widely in engineering practice. An engineering system may have multiple failure criteria. In the current paper, system reliability analysis with multiple failure modes under both epistemic and aleatory uncertainties is presented. Epistemic uncertainty is modelled using p-boxes, while aleatory uncertainty is modelled using probability distributions. A first-order reliability method is developed and non-linear performance functions are linearized by the sampling method instead of the commonly used Taylor’s expansion at the most probable point. Furthermore, multiple failure modes in a system are often correlated because they depend on the same uncertain variables. In order to consider these correlated failure modes, the methods proposed by Feng and Frank are extended in this paper in order to calculate the joint probability of failure for two arbitrary failure modes under both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties. The Pearson correlation coefficient of two arbitrary failure modes is determined by the sampling method. Since two types of uncertainty exist in the system, the probability of system failure is an interval rather than a point value. The probability of failure of the system can be obtained by the combination of the extension ‘narrow’ bound method and the interval arithmetic. A numerical example is presented to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • N-C Xiao & H-Z Huang & Z Wang & Y Li & Y Liu, 2012. "Reliability analysis of series systems with multiple failure modes under epistemic and aleatory uncertainties," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 226(3), pages 295-304, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:226:y:2012:i:3:p:295-304
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X11421266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X11421266
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X11421266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J.M. Aughenbaugh & J.W. Herrmann, 2009. "Information management for estimating system reliability using imprecise probabilities and precise Bayesian updating," International Journal of Reliability and Safety, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1/2/3), pages 35-56.
    2. Phani R. Adduri & Ravi C. Penmetsa, 2007. "Fast Fourier transform based system reliability analysis," International Journal of Reliability and Safety, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(3), pages 239-259.
    3. Sankararaman, Shankar & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2011. "Likelihood-based representation of epistemic uncertainty due to sparse point data and/or interval data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(7), pages 814-824.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ning-Cong Xiao & Yan-Feng Li & Le Yu & Zhonglai Wang & Hong-Zhong Huang, 2014. "Saddlepoint approximation-based reliability analysis method for structural systems with parameter uncertainties," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(5), pages 529-540, October.
    2. Chengning Zhou & Ning-Cong Xiao & Ming J Zuo & Xiaoxu Huang, 2020. "AK-PDF: An active learning method combining kriging and probability density function for efficient reliability analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(3), pages 536-549, June.
    3. Ying-Kui Gu & Chao-Jun Fan & Ling-Qiang Liang & Jun Zhang, 2022. "Reliability calculation method based on the Copula function for mechanical systems with dependent failure," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 99-116, April.
    4. Mi, Jinhua & Li, Yan-Feng & Yang, Yuan-Jian & Peng, Weiwen & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2016. "Reliability assessment of complex electromechanical systems under epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1-15.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sankararaman, S. & Mahadevan, S., 2013. "Separating the contributions of variability and parameter uncertainty in probability distributions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 187-199.
    2. Wang, Yuhao & Liu, Yongming, 2020. "Bayesian entropy network for fusion of different types of information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Mi, Jinhua & Li, Yan-Feng & Yang, Yuan-Jian & Peng, Weiwen & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2016. "Reliability assessment of complex electromechanical systems under epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1-15.
    4. Su, Xiaoyan & Mahadevan, Sankaran & Xu, Peida & Deng, Yong, 2014. "Inclusion of task dependence in human reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 41-55.
    5. VanDerHorn, Eric & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2018. "Bayesian model updating with summarized statistical and reliability data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 12-24.
    6. Cheng, Lei & Lu, Zhenzhou & Zhang, Leigang, 2015. "Application of Rejection Sampling based methodology to variance based parametric sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 9-18.
    7. Ling, You & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2013. "Quantitative model validation techniques: New insights," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 217-231.
    8. Wang, Zhenqiang & Jia, Gaofeng, 2020. "Augmented sample-based approach for efficient evaluation of risk sensitivity with respect to epistemic uncertainty in distribution parameters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    9. Sankararaman, Shankar & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2015. "Integration of model verification, validation, and calibration for uncertainty quantification in engineering systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 194-209.
    10. Mi, Jinhua & Lu, Ning & Li, Yan-Feng & Huang, Hong-Zhong & Bai, Libing, 2022. "An evidential network-based hierarchical method for system reliability analysis with common cause failures and mixed uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    11. Xiang Peng & Xiaoqing Xu & Jiquan Li & Shaofei Jiang, 2021. "A Sampling-Based Sensitivity Analysis Method Considering the Uncertainties of Input Variables and Their Distribution Parameters," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Mi, Jinhua & Li, Yan-Feng & Peng, Weiwen & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2018. "Reliability analysis of complex multi-state system with common cause failure based on evidential networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 71-81.
    13. Tohme, Tony & Vanslette, Kevin & Youcef-Toumi, Kamal, 2020. "A generalized Bayesian approach to model calibration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:226:y:2012:i:3:p:295-304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.