IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v225y2011i2p219-231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Remaining useful life, technical health, and life extension

Author

Listed:
  • P Vaidya
  • M Rausand

Abstract

Life extension has for a long time been an important and highly discussed issue in nuclear and aviation industries, and has recently attracted considerable attention in the subsea oil and gas industry. Decision-making related to life extension is a multidisciplinary problem, but it primarily depends on the remaining useful life. This paper clarifies the concepts of remaining useful life and technical health, and discusses various influencing factors. An overall model with the capability to handle a heterogeneous combination of requirements, such as degradation modelling, uncertain environmental and operational conditions, uncertain sensor data and expert opinion is suggested for life extension decision-making. It is concluded that a physics-based modelling approach is appropriate for equipment in the subsea oil and gas industry.

Suggested Citation

  • P Vaidya & M Rausand, 2011. "Remaining useful life, technical health, and life extension," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(2), pages 219-231, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:225:y:2011:i:2:p:219-231
    DOI: 10.1177/1748007810394557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748007810394557
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748007810394557?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peres, François & Bouzaïene, Leïla & Bocquet, Jean-Claude & Billy, François & Lannoy, André & Haïk, Philippe, 2007. "Anticipating aging failure using feedback data and expert judgment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 200-210.
    2. van Noortwijk, J.M., 2009. "A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 2-21.
    3. Barker, C.T. & Newby, M.J., 2009. "Optimal non-periodic inspection for a multivariate degradation model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 33-43.
    4. Dieulle, L. & Berenguer, C. & Grall, A. & Roussignol, M., 2003. "Sequential condition-based maintenance scheduling for a deteriorating system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(2), pages 451-461, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Xuejing & Fouladirad, Mitra & Bérenguer, Christophe & Bordes, Laurent, 2010. "Condition-based inspection/replacement policies for non-monotone deteriorating systems with environmental covariates," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(8), pages 921-934.
    2. Flage, Roger & Coit, David W. & Luxhøj, James T. & Aven, Terje, 2012. "Safety constraints applied to an adaptive Bayesian condition-based maintenance optimization model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 16-26.
    3. Lin Wang & Zhiqiang Lu & Yifei Ren, 2019. "A rolling horizon approach for production planning and condition-based maintenance under uncertain demand," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(6), pages 1014-1028, December.
    4. Shen, Jingyuan & Cui, Lirong & Ma, Yizhong, 2019. "Availability and optimal maintenance policy for systems degrading in dynamic environments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 133-143.
    5. Zhu, Qiushi & Peng, Hao & Timmermans, Bas & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2017. "A condition-based maintenance model for a single component in a system with scheduled and unscheduled downs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 365-380.
    6. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    7. Guo, Chiming & Wang, Wenbin & Guo, Bo & Si, Xiaosheng, 2013. "A maintenance optimization model for mission-oriented systems based on Wiener degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 183-194.
    8. A Grall & M Fouladirad, 2008. "Maintenance decision rule with embedded online Bayesian change detection for gradually non-stationary deteriorating systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 222(3), pages 359-369, September.
    9. Fouladirad, Mitra & Grall, Antoine, 2011. "Condition-based maintenance for a system subject to a non-homogeneous wear process with a wear rate transition," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(6), pages 611-618.
    10. Mitra Fouladirad & Antoine Grall, 2015. "Monitoring and condition-based maintenance with abrupt change in a system’s deterioration rate," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(12), pages 2183-2194, September.
    11. Peng, Hao & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2016. "Joint optimization of condition-based maintenance and production lot-sizing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 94-107.
    12. Huynh, K.T. & Barros, A. & Bérenguer, C. & Castro, I.T., 2011. "A periodic inspection and replacement policy for systems subject to competing failure modes due to degradation and traumatic events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 497-508.
    13. Lam, Ji Ye Janet & Banjevic, Dragan, 2015. "A myopic policy for optimal inspection scheduling for condition based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1-11.
    14. Li, Heping & Deloux, Estelle & Dieulle, Laurence, 2016. "A condition-based maintenance policy for multi-component systems with Lévy copulas dependence," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 44-55.
    15. Zhang, Xueqing & Gao, Hui, 2012. "Road maintenance optimization through a discrete-time semi-Markov decision process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 110-119.
    16. Wang, Xiaolin & Balakrishnan, Narayanaswamy & Guo, Bo, 2014. "Residual life estimation based on a generalized Wiener degradation process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 13-23.
    17. Ponchet, Amélie & Fouladirad, Mitra & Grall, Antoine, 2010. "Assessment of a maintenance model for a multi-deteriorating mode system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1244-1254.
    18. Fauriat, William & Zio, Enrico, 2020. "Optimization of an aperiodic sequential inspection and condition-based maintenance policy driven by value of information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    19. Pan, Yubin & Hong, Rongjing & Chen, Jie & Wu, Weiwei, 2020. "A hybrid DBN-SOM-PF-based prognostic approach of remaining useful life for wind turbine gearbox," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 138-154.
    20. Zhang, Zhengxin & Si, Xiaosheng & Hu, Changhua & Lei, Yaguo, 2018. "Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 775-796.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:225:y:2011:i:2:p:219-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.