IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/reorpe/v9y1977i3p25-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Working Class Family, Women's Liberation, and Class Struggle: The Case of Nineteenth Century British History

Author

Listed:
  • Jane Humphries

    (Dept. of Economics Univ. of Mass. Amherst, MA 01003)

Abstract

Recent Marxist analyses have focused on the working class family as the arena of domestic labour and the context of the reproduction of labour- power. The effect has been to view the family in terms of the functional prerequi sites of capitalism, and to locate its reproduction in the reproduction of capital. But to look only from the perspective of capital is to neglect the role of class struggle. This paper attempts to redress this bias by arguing that in certain per iods of capitalist development labour's defence of the family, a defence moti vated by the family's role in the determination of the standard of living, the development of class cohesion and the waging of class struggle, was an important reason for its survival.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane Humphries, 1977. "The Working Class Family, Women's Liberation, and Class Struggle: The Case of Nineteenth Century British History," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 9(3), pages 25-41, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:9:y:1977:i:3:p:25-41
    DOI: 10.1177/048661347700900305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/048661347700900305
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/048661347700900305?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. V. Clements, 1961. "British Trade Unions and Popular Political Economy 1850-1875," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 14(1), pages 93-104, August.
    2. G. G. Hanson, 1975. "Craft Unions, Welfare Benefits, and the Case for Trade Union Law Reform, 1867–75," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 28(2), pages 243-259, May.
    3. Himmelweit, Susan & Mohun, Simon, 1977. "Domestic Labour and Capital," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 1(1), pages 15-31, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marina Sánchez, 2015. "De la reproducción económica a la sostenibilidad de la vida," Revista de Economia Critica, Asociacion de Economia Critica, vol. 19, pages 58-76.
    2. Biesecker, Adelheid & Hofmeister, Sabine, 2010. "Focus: (Re)productivity: Sustainable relations both between society and nature and between the genders," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 1703-1711, June.
    3. Gillian Hewitson, 2001. "A Survey of Feminist Economics," Working Papers 2001.01, School of Economics, La Trobe University.
    4. Ellen Mutari, 2001. ""...As broad as our life experience": visions of feminist political economy, 1972-1991," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 379-399, December.
    5. Herbert Gintis & Samuel Bowles, 1981. "Structure and Practice in the Labor Theory of Value," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 12(4), pages 1-26, January.
    6. Zdravka Todorova, 2015. "A Veblenian articulation of the monetary theory of production," Working Papers PKWP1501, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).
    7. Giovanna Vertova, 2014. "What’s gender got to do with the Great Recession? The Italian case," Chapters, in: Riccardo Bellofiore & Giovanna Vertova (ed.), The Great Recession and the Contradictions of Contemporary Capitalism, chapter 11, pages 189-207, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Armanda Cetrulo & Dario Guarascio & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2024. "Two neglected origins of inequality: hierarchical power and care work," LEM Papers Series 2024/04, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    9. François-Xavier Devetter, 2016. "Can Public Policies Bring about the Democratization of the Outsourcing of Household Tasks?," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 48(3), pages 365-393, September.
    10. Ruirui Zhang & Joseph D’Andrea & Chunmin Lang, 2023. "Gifts and Commodities: A Dialectical Thought Experiment for Sublation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, May.
    11. Amartya Sen, 1987. "Gender and Cooperative Conflicts," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-1987-018, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    12. Vaca-Trigo, Iliana & Baron, Camila, 2022. "Decentring GDP: Well-being, care and time," Documentos de Proyectos 48157, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    13. Annemarie Burandt & Tanja Mölders, 2017. "Nature–gender relations within a social-ecological perspective on European multifunctional agriculture: the case of agrobiodiversity," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(4), pages 955-967, December.
    14. Julie Matthaei, 2018. "URPE, Radical Political Economics, Social Movements, and Revolution—From Identity Politics to Solidarity Economics: Looking Backward, Looking Forward on the Occasion of URPE’s Fiftieth Anniversary," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 50(3), pages 504-521, September.
    15. Elif Karacimen, 2016. "Consumer Credit as an Aspect of Everyday Life of Workers in Developing Countries," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 48(2), pages 252-268, May.
    16. Elaine Agyemang Tontoh, 2021. "The Triple Day Thesis: Theorizing Motherhood within Marxist Economic Theory and Marxist Feminist Social Reproduction Theory," Working Papers 2108, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
    17. Xuesheng You, 2024. "Female relatives and domestic service in nineteenth‐century England and Wales: Female kin servants revisited," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 77(2), pages 444-471, May.
    18. Manoshi Mitra, 1981. "Women in Colonial Agriculture: Bihar in the Late 18th and the 19th Century," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 12(1), pages 29-53, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:9:y:1977:i:3:p:25-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.urpe.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.