IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/padigm/v19y2015i1p37-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Measure of Consumer Complaining Behaviour in Service Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Prabhjot Kaur
  • Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

Abstract

Consumer complaints are reflection of mistakes committed by the service provider. These help to show a mirror to the organization indicating the reality of the situation, which can be used to handle displeased customers. Service providers these days are focusing on providing easy and varied ways, through which people can represent their problems. It is imperative to keep hold of existing customers, considering the cost of acquiring new customers and competitiveness in the market. This study aims to check the reliability and validity of the construct of consumer complaining behaviour (CCB), from the perspective of the Indian service industry, especially banking, telecom and insurance. A total of eight factors, namely, redress-seeking complaint, friendly complaint, opportunism, third-party complaint, word-of-mouth complaint, switching, loyalty complaint and neglect, have been taken to develop scales in order to collect data from 180 customers by using the critical incident technique (CIT). Various tools of reliability and validity were applied on the collected data. Results revealed an adequate fit of the theoretical model proposed, by satisfying all the criteria of reliability and validity (content, convergent and discriminant). This construct can be used by marketers and researchers to understand various consumer dissatisfaction responses given in different industries. This paper is first of its kind, which has taken all the factors together and validated the construct in the Indian context.

Suggested Citation

  • Prabhjot Kaur & Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, 2015. "A Measure of Consumer Complaining Behaviour in Service Industry," Paradigm, , vol. 19(1), pages 37-51, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:padigm:v:19:y:2015:i:1:p:37-51
    DOI: 10.1177/0971890715585200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0971890715585200
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0971890715585200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sharma, Subhash & Mukherjee, Soumen & Kumar, Ajith & Dillon, William R., 2005. "A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(7), pages 935-943, July.
    2. P. Van Kenhove & K. De Wulf & S. Steenhaut, 2003. "The Relationship between Consumers’ Unethical Behavior and Customer Loyalty in a Retail Environment," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 03/167, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    3. Heejung Ro, 2014. "Complaint, patience, and neglect: responses to a dissatisfying service experience," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 8(2), pages 197-216, June.
    4. Bougie, J.R.G. & Pieters, R. & Zeelenberg, M., 2003. "Angry customers don't come back, they get back : The experience and behavioral implications of anger and dissatisfaction in services," Other publications TiSEM 1708fb71-fd68-41d9-b870-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Maute, Manfred F. & Forrester, William Jr., 1993. "The structure and determinants of consumer complaint intentions and behavior," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 219-247, June.
    6. Isabelle Prim-Allaz & Bernard Pras, 1999. "«Friendly» Complaining Behaviors: Toward A Relational Approach," Post-Print halshs-00470640, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarah Steenhaut & Patrick Kenhove, 2006. "The Mediating Role of Anticipated Guilt in Consumers’ Ethical Decision-Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 69(3), pages 269-288, December.
    2. Sánchez-García, Isabel & Currás-Pérez, Rafael, 2011. "Effects of dissatisfaction in tourist services: The role of anger and regret," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1397-1406.
    3. Grace Suk Ha Chan & Irini Lai Fun Tang & Aiko Hoi Kei Sou, 2017. "An Exploration of Consumer Complaint Behavior towards the Hotel Industry: Case Study in Macao," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(5), pages 56-76, October.
    4. Futris, Ted G. & Schramm, David G. & Richardson, Evin W. & Lee, Tae Kyoung, 2015. "The impact of organizational support on the transfer of learning to practice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 36-43.
    5. Pan, Jing Yu & Liu, Dahai, 2022. "Mask-wearing intentions on airplanes during COVID-19 – Application of theory of planned behavior model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 32-44.
    6. van Oest, Rutger & Knox, George, 2011. "Extending the BG/NBD: A simple model of purchases and complaints," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 30-37.
    7. Garaus, Marion & Wagner, Udo, 2016. "Retail shopper confusion: Conceptualization, scale development, and consequences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3459-3467.
    8. Sarker, Rumana Islam & Kaplan, Sigal & Mailer, Markus & Timmermans, Harry J.P., 2019. "Applying affective event theory to explain transit users’ reactions to service disruptions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 593-605.
    9. Chun-Hsi Vivian Chen & Yu-Cheng Chen, 2021. "Assessment of Enhancing Employee Engagement in Energy-Saving Behavior at Workplace: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, February.
    10. D. Van den Poel, 2003. "Predicting Mail-Order Repeat Buying. Which Variables Matter?," Review of Business and Economic Literature, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Review of Business and Economic Literature, vol. 0(3), pages 371-404.
    11. Kalamas, Maria & Laroche, Michel & Makdessian, Lucy, 2008. "Reaching the boiling point: Consumers' negative affective reactions to firm-attributed service failures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(8), pages 813-824, August.
    12. Heyes, Anthony & Kapur, Sandeep, 2012. "Angry customers, e-word-of-mouth and incentives for quality provision," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 813-828.
    13. Andrea Lučić, 2020. "Measuring Sustainable Marketing Orientation—Scale Development Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, February.
    14. Raju, Sekar & Rajagopal, Priyali & Murdock, Mitchel R., 2021. "The moderating effects of prior trust on consumer responses to firm failures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 24-37.
    15. Huang, Wen-Hsien & Shen, George C. & Liang, Che-Ling, 2019. "The effect of threshold free shipping policies on online shoppers' willingness to pay for shipping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 105-112.
    16. Tine Bock & Iris Vermeir & Patrick Kenhove, 2013. "“What’s the Harm in Being Unethical? These Strangers are Rich Anyway!” Exploring Underlying Factors of Double Standards," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 225-240, January.
    17. Nur’Hidayah Che Ahmat Author_Email: nurhidayahcheahmat@gmail.com & Salleh Mohd Radzi & Mohd Salehuddin Mohd Zahari & Rosmaliza Muhammad, 2011. "The Effect Of Factors Influencing The Perception Of Price Fairness Towards Customer Response Behaviors," 2nd International Conference on Business and Economic Research (2nd ICBER 2011) Proceeding 2011-169, Conference Master Resources.
    18. Chen, Feiqiong & Liu, Huiqian & Ge, Yuhao, 2021. "How does integration affect industrial innovation through networks in technology-sourcing overseas M&A? A comparison between China and the US," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 281-292.
    19. Fennell, Patrick B. & Coleman, Joshua T. & Kuo, Andrew, 2020. "The moderating role of donation quantifiers on price fairness judgments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 464-473.
    20. Marien Alet Graham & Irma Eloff, 2022. "Comparing Mental Health, Wellbeing and Flourishing in Undergraduate Students Pre- and during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:padigm:v:19:y:2015:i:1:p:37-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.