IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v38y2023i4p327-346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legacies and impacts of sports mega-events in Brazil: São Paulo as a host city for football matches

Author

Listed:
  • Fillipe Soares Romano
  • Roberto Paolo Vico
  • Ricardo Ricci Uvinha

Abstract

Football is an integral part of Brazil’s historical-cultural process, and tourism represents one of the segments deeply impacted by the occurrence of sporting mega-events. The present study aims to present and critically reflect on the main legacies and impacts that these events brought to the Brazilian population. This paper is based on notes surrounding the legacies put forward for the city of São Paulo. To do this, information gathering lends to suggestions that help situate future planning and organization. The purpose of this paper concerns sociocultural and economic futures and the role of tourism and events for local communities based on the current realities and challenges in Brazil. The article is based on a qualitative approach, where descriptive and explanatory information is triangulated. This study utilizes a range of methods, employing a combination of bibliographic research, documentary analysis, and content analysis to frame the base of the research. Moreover, we use field research techniques such as semi-structured interviews with managers, questionnaires administered to residents, interviews with local representatives, direct observation, and active participation in events held at the main stadium associated with sport mega-events in São Paulo, namely, the Neo Química Arena. Noteworthy findings demonstrate a discrepancy between the objectives pursued by host city planners, who strive to maximize the positive legacies encompassing local infrastructure, stadiums, and the city’s image, and the experiences reported by local residents, who have encountered negative impacts and legacies resulting from the same sport mega-event. These adverse effects include issues such as flooding, gentrification, exclusion from decision-making processes, and real estate speculation. Stadiums are considered the greatest tangible legacies of sport mega-events, although their construction and maintenance costs are questionable. The participation of local residents seems to be essential in the promotion, knowledge, appropriation, belonging, support, and transparency in all phases of the mega-event planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Fillipe Soares Romano & Roberto Paolo Vico & Ricardo Ricci Uvinha, 2023. "Legacies and impacts of sports mega-events in Brazil: São Paulo as a host city for football matches," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(4), pages 327-346, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:38:y:2023:i:4:p:327-346
    DOI: 10.1177/02690942231213589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02690942231213589
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/02690942231213589?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Terri Byers & Emily Hayday & Athanasios (Sakis) Pappous, 2020. "A new conceptualization of mega sports event legacy delivery: Wicked problems and critical realist solution," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 171-182, April.
    2. Smith, Andrew & Ritchie, Brent W. & Chien, P. Monica, 2019. "Citizens’ attitudes towards mega-events: A new framework," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 208-210.
    3. Shang Chun Ma & Kyriaki (Kiki) Kaplanidou, 2017. "Examining the Importance of Legacy Outcomes of Major Sport Events for Host City Residents’ Quality of Life," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 12(4), pages 903-923, December.
    4. Jonathan Barclay, 2009. "Predicting The Costs And Benefits Of Mega‐Sporting Events: Misjudgement Of Olympic Proportions?," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 62-66, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Themistocles Kokolakakis & Fernando Lera-Lopez, 2020. "Sport Promotion through Sport Mega-Events. An Analysis for Types of Olympic Sports in London 2012," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Ji Wu & Madeleine Orr & Kurumi Aizawa & Yuhei Inoue, 2021. "Language Relativity in Legacy Literature: A Systematic Review in Multiple Languages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Roberto Gásquez & Vicente Royuela, 2014. "Is Football an Indicator of Development at the International Level?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 117(3), pages 827-848, July.
    4. Christian WEISMAYER, 2022. "Applied Research in Quality of Life: A Computational Literature Review," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(3), pages 1433-1458, June.
    5. Linda Christie & Kenneth Gibb, 2015. "A collaborative approach to event-led regeneration: The governance of legacy from the 2014 Commonwealth Games," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 30(8), pages 871-887, December.
    6. Sergi Cerezo-Esteve & Eduard Inglés & Jordi Segui-Urbaneja & Francesc Solanellas, 2022. "The Environmental Impact of Major Sport Events (Giga, Mega and Major): A Systematic Review from 2000 to 2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Jérôme Massiani, 2020. "Towards Improved Guidelines for Cost–Benefit Analysis of Sport and Cultural Events," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 39(3), pages 270-289, September.
    8. Vörös, Tünde, 2017. "Költség-haszon elemzési keretrendszer sportberuházások társadalmi-gazdasági értékeléséhez [An economic framework for cost-benefit analysis of sports facilities]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(4), pages 394-420.
    9. Zawadzki Krystian, 2022. "The Economic Legacy of Mega Sporting Events. The Impact of Hosting European Olympic Games on GDP Growth Through Infrastructure Development," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 29(3), pages 36-42, September.
    10. Brij Maharaj, 2015. "The turn of the south? Social and economic impacts of mega-events in India, Brazil and South Africa," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 30(8), pages 983-999, December.
    11. Farideh Baroghi & Paulo J. G. Ribeiro & Fernando Fonseca, 2024. "Towards a Holistic Framework for the Olympic-Led Sustainable Urban Planning Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, January.
    12. Wanyoung Lee & Yoonso Choi, 2024. "Critical Interpretation of Spatiality in Professional Korean Football Stadiums: Relph’s Theory of Placeness," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 29(1), pages 204-220, March.
    13. Joanna Poczta & Agata Dąbrowska & Marek Kazimierczak & François Gravelle & Ewa Malchrowicz-Mośko, 2020. "Overtourism and Medium Scale Sporting Events Organisations—the Perception of Negative Externalities by Host Residents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-24, April.
    14. Wolfgang Maennig & Christopher Vierhaus, 2015. "Who Wins Olympic Bids?," Working Papers 050, Chair for Economic Policy, University of Hamburg.
    15. Yangjie Wang & Cuicui Sun & Jinxian Wang & Xiaoyan Mao, 2024. "Do People Feel Healthier After Holding Sports Mega-Events? Evidence from the 2010 Guangzhou Asian Games," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 25(5), pages 583-609, June.
    16. Valentin Herbold & Hannes Thees & Julian Philipp, 2020. "The Host Community and Its Role in Sports Tourism—Exploring an Emerging Research Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-26, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:38:y:2023:i:4:p:327-346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.