IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i3p951-d1324430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a Holistic Framework for the Olympic-Led Sustainable Urban Planning Process

Author

Listed:
  • Farideh Baroghi

    (CTAC (Centre for Territory, Environment and Construction), University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • Paulo J. G. Ribeiro

    (CTAC (Centre for Territory, Environment and Construction), University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • Fernando Fonseca

    (CTAC (Centre for Territory, Environment and Construction), University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

Abstract

Sport mega-events, like the Olympics, are renowned for their urban and socioeconomic impacts. Based on a literature review, this paper proposes a holistic framework for an Olympic-led sustainable planning process, encompassing five key sustainable urban principles: accessibility, integration, flexibility/adaptability, security, and sustainability compliance. The framework provides a structured approach to assess these principles at three different temporal and spatial levels: location selection, pre-event planning, and post-event planning. The proposed holistic framework is applied to the Rio 2016 Summer Olympics, revealing a significant disconnection between the initially promised sustainable development goals and practical achievements. While enhancements in accessibility were observed, the other key sustainable urban principles exhibited limited or negligible improvements. The proposed holistic framework holds the potential to foster lasting positive impacts and sustainable urban improvements in host cities, particularly in developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Farideh Baroghi & Paulo J. G. Ribeiro & Fernando Fonseca, 2024. "Towards a Holistic Framework for the Olympic-Led Sustainable Urban Planning Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:951-:d:1324430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/951/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/951/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Gaffney & Cerianne Robertson, 2018. "Smarter than Smart: Rio de Janeiro's Flawed Emergence as a Smart City," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 47-64, July.
    2. Jonathan Barclay, 2009. "Predicting The Costs And Benefits Of Mega‐Sporting Events: Misjudgement Of Olympic Proportions?," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 62-66, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kevin Morgan & Brian Webb, 2020. "Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 84-95.
    2. Johannes Stübinger & Lucas Schneider, 2020. "Understanding Smart City—A Data-Driven Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Fillipe Soares Romano & Roberto Paolo Vico & Ricardo Ricci Uvinha, 2023. "Legacies and impacts of sports mega-events in Brazil: São Paulo as a host city for football matches," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(4), pages 327-346, June.
    4. Bipashyee Ghosh & Saurabh Arora, 2022. "Smart as (un)democratic? The making of a smart city imaginary in Kolkata, India," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(1), pages 318-339, February.
    5. Julsrud, Dr. Tom Erik & Krogstad, Dr. Julie Runde, 2020. "Is there enough trust for the smart city? exploring acceptance for use of mobile phone data in oslo and tallinn," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    6. Jérôme Massiani, 2020. "Towards Improved Guidelines for Cost–Benefit Analysis of Sport and Cultural Events," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 39(3), pages 270-289, September.
    7. Khushboo Gupta & Wenwen Zhang & Ralph P Hall, 2021. "Risk priorities and their co-occurrences in smart city project implementation: Evidence from India’s Smart Cities Mission (SCM)," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(4), pages 880-894, May.
    8. Monique Mann & Peta Mitchell & Marcus Foth & Irina Anastasiu, 2020. "#BlockSidewalk to Barcelona: Technological sovereignty and the social license to operate smart cities," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(9), pages 1103-1115, September.
    9. Vörös, Tünde, 2017. "Költség-haszon elemzési keretrendszer sportberuházások társadalmi-gazdasági értékeléséhez [An economic framework for cost-benefit analysis of sports facilities]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(4), pages 394-420.
    10. Zawadzki Krystian, 2022. "The Economic Legacy of Mega Sporting Events. The Impact of Hosting European Olympic Games on GDP Growth Through Infrastructure Development," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 29(3), pages 36-42, September.
    11. Basem Almadani & Farouq Aliyu & Abdulrahman Aliyu, 2023. "Integrated Operation Centers in Smart Cities: A Humanitarian Engineering Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-24, July.
    12. Brij Maharaj, 2015. "The turn of the south? Social and economic impacts of mega-events in India, Brazil and South Africa," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 30(8), pages 983-999, December.
    13. Roberto Gásquez & Vicente Royuela, 2014. "Is Football an Indicator of Development at the International Level?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 117(3), pages 827-848, July.
    14. Ana Condeço-Melhorado & Inmaculada Mohino & Borja Moya-Gómez & Juan Carlos García-Palomares, 2020. "The Rio Olympic Games: A Look into City Dynamics through the Lens of Twitter Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Kevin Morgan & Brian Webb, 2020. "Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 84-95.
    16. Linda Christie & Kenneth Gibb, 2015. "A collaborative approach to event-led regeneration: The governance of legacy from the 2014 Commonwealth Games," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 30(8), pages 871-887, December.
    17. Joanna Poczta & Agata Dąbrowska & Marek Kazimierczak & François Gravelle & Ewa Malchrowicz-Mośko, 2020. "Overtourism and Medium Scale Sporting Events Organisations—the Perception of Negative Externalities by Host Residents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-24, April.
    18. David Castells-Quintana & Roberto Gasquez, 2024. "Club football and economic dynamism: a regional analysis for Europe," Working Papers wpdea2402, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
    19. Wolfgang Maennig & Christopher Vierhaus, 2015. "Who Wins Olympic Bids?," Working Papers 050, Chair for Economic Policy, University of Hamburg.
    20. Valentin Herbold & Hannes Thees & Julian Philipp, 2020. "The Host Community and Its Role in Sports Tourism—Exploring an Emerging Research Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-26, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:951-:d:1324430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.