IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v30y2015i8p871-887.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A collaborative approach to event-led regeneration: The governance of legacy from the 2014 Commonwealth Games

Author

Listed:
  • Linda Christie
  • Kenneth Gibb

Abstract

This paper stresses the role of collaborative working within the new urban governance literature. The legacy approach for the 2014 Commonwealth Games has thus far been well received as an example of successful partnership working. Glasgow’s approach to legacy is discussed within the wider context of an increasing strategic focus on event-led regeneration. High-level political support for legacy led to the early development of Glasgow’s Legacy Plan in 2009, followed by the development of a legacy partnership: the Glasgow Legacy Board . The paper contributes to the literature by exploring a conceptual understanding of inter-governmental working for regeneration, through close examination of Glasgow’s legacy approach, development, structure and governance. To what extent does Glasgow’s collaborative approach to legacy represent a new institutional form of network governance for the delivery of urban regeneration in Scotland? The paper also reflects on the long-term transferability of this collaborative approach to legacy for the delivery of urban regeneration in Scotland beyond 2014.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda Christie & Kenneth Gibb, 2015. "A collaborative approach to event-led regeneration: The governance of legacy from the 2014 Commonwealth Games," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 30(8), pages 871-887, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:30:y:2015:i:8:p:871-887
    DOI: 10.1177/0269094215603953
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0269094215603953
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0269094215603953?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nancy Holman, 2013. "Effective Strategy Implementation: Why Partnership Interconnectivity Matters," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(1), pages 82-101, February.
    2. Jurian Edelenbos & Arwin Van Buuren & Erik-Hans Klijn, 2013. "Connective Capacities of Network Managers," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 131-159, January.
    3. António Martins & Ana Serra, 2011. "Market impact of international sporting and cultural events," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 35(4), pages 382-416, October.
    4. William D. Coleman & Anthony Perl, 1999. "Internationalized Policy Environments and Policy Network Analysis," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 47(4), pages 691-709, September.
    5. Holger Preuss, 2004. "The Economics of Staging the Olympics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3473, March.
    6. Beverly A. Cigler, 1999. "Pre‐Conditions For The Emergence Of Multicommunity Collaborative Organizations1," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 16(1), pages 86-102, March.
    7. Steven Brent Lackey & David Freshwater & Anil Rupasingha, 2002. "Factors Influencing Local Government Cooperation in Rural Areas: Evidence from the Tennessee Valley," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 16(2), pages 138-154, May.
    8. Jonathan Barclay, 2009. "Predicting The Costs And Benefits Of Mega‐Sporting Events: Misjudgement Of Olympic Proportions?," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 62-66, June.
    9. Neil Gray & Gerry Mooney, 2011. "Glasgow’s new urban frontier: 'Civilising’ the population of 'Glasgow East’," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 4-24, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ayda Eraydın & Bilge Armatlı Köroğlu & Hilal Erkuş Öztürk & Suna Senem Yaşar, 2008. "Network Governance for Competitiveness: The Role of Policy Networks in the Economic Performance of Settlements in the Izmir Region," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(11), pages 2291-2321, October.
    2. Pasquale Lucio Scandizzo & Maria Rita Pierleoni, 2018. "Assessing The Olympic Games: The Economic Impact And Beyond," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 649-682, July.
    3. Bent Flyvbjerg & Allison Stewart & Alexander Budzier, 2016. "The Oxford Olympics Study 2016: Cost and Cost Overrun at the Games," Papers 1607.04484, arXiv.org.
    4. Fourie, Johan & Santana-Gallego, María, 2011. "The impact of mega-sport events on tourist arrivals," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1364-1370.
    5. Lihi Lahat, 2011. "How can leaders’ perceptions guide policy analysis in an era of governance?," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 44(2), pages 135-155, June.
    6. Yawei Chen & Lei Qu & Marjolein Spaans, 2013. "Framing the Long-Term Impact of Mega-Event Strategies on the Development of Olympic Host Cities," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 340-359, June.
    7. M.R. van den Berg & M. de Nooij, 2013. "The bidding paradox: why economists, consultants and politicians disagree on the economic effects of mega sports events but might agree on their attractiveness," Working Papers 13-08, Utrecht School of Economics.
    8. Fillipe Soares Romano & Roberto Paolo Vico & Ricardo Ricci Uvinha, 2023. "Legacies and impacts of sports mega-events in Brazil: São Paulo as a host city for football matches," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(4), pages 327-346, June.
    9. Luša Đana, 2017. "Olympic Diplomacy and the Emerging States: Striving for Influence in the Multipolar World," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 23(79), pages 73-102, September.
    10. Andrea Collins & Andrew Flynn & Max Munday & Annette Roberts, 2007. "Assessing the Environmental Consequences of Major Sporting Events: The 2003/04 FA Cup Final," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(3), pages 457-476, March.
    11. Bakoš Eduard & Hrůza Filip & Fiedor David & Klemešová Kamila Dolák, 2021. "The perception of inter-municipal cooperation by local officials and managers," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, June.
    12. Huei-Fu Lu, 2021. "Hallmark Sporting Events as a Vehicle for Promoting the Sustainable Development of Regional Tourism: Strategic Perspectives from Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, March.
    13. Germà Bel & Mildred E. Warner, 2016. "Factors explaining inter-municipal cooperation in service delivery: a meta-regression analysis," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 91-115, April.
    14. Bent Flyvbjerg & Alexander Budzier & Daniel Lunn, 2021. "Regression to the tail: Why the Olympics blow up," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(2), pages 233-260, March.
    15. Tobias Streicher & Sascha L. Schmidt & Dominik Schreyer, 2019. "Referenda on Hosting the Olympics: What Drives Voter Turnout?," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 20(5), pages 627-653, June.
    16. Siti Zubaidah & Ida Widianingsih & Budiman Rusli & Asep Djaja Saefullah, 2023. "Policy Network on the Kotaku Program in the Global South: Findings from Palembang, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    17. John Lauermann, 2016. "Temporary projects, durable outcomes: Urban development through failed Olympic bids?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(9), pages 1885-1901, July.
    18. Amélie Charles & Olivier Darné, 2016. "Stock market reactions to FIFA World Cup announcements: An event study," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(4), pages 2028-2036.
    19. Olmos, Lorena & Bellido, Héctor & Román-Aso, Juan A., 2020. "The effects of mega-events on perceived corruption," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    20. Eva Kassens-Noor & John Lauermann, 2017. "How to Bid Better for the Olympics: A Participatory Mega-Event Planning Strategy for Local Legacies," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(4), pages 335-345, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:30:y:2015:i:8:p:871-887. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.