IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v34y2019i7p680-698.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User-generated insight of Rio’s Rocinha favela tour: Authentic attraction or vulnerable living environment?

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas Wise

    (Liverpool John Moores University, UK)

  • Maurício Polidoro

    (Federal Institute of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil)

  • Gareth Hall

    (Aberystwyth University, UK)

  • Ricardo Ricci Uvinha

Abstract

Urban transformations help shape new opportunities and create/re-create awareness in everyday living environments. It is not transformation in the infrastructural sense, but transformation in the form of a service industry producing socio-economic change that can result in inclusion and exclusion of people in the community, thus affecting the everyday living environment. Within this, we need to consider the tourist gaze and how users who visit/tour vulnerable living environments report perceptions of their experiences on forums such as TripAdvisor, which helps researchers frame understandings of commodification, opportunities/awareness and even authenticity (each addressed in this paper). This paper evaluates TripAdvisor posts of ‘Rio’s Rocinha Favela Tour’. In many respects, the notion of commodification, and even authenticity, runs through each theme, but the analysis and data posted to TripAdvisor challenges us to consider how a favela becomes a consumer product or a tourist attraction. The Rocinha Favela tour is widely publicised to prospective visitors as a chance to experience a living and working favela, the focus of the first theme presented in this paper. Given Rocinha has become a popular attraction in Rio, this leads to the second theme: opportunity or awareness. Opportunities do exist for people in the community to get involved in tourism, and turning the favela into a product helps shape and maintain awareness. The third theme builds on and relates to the previous two, but focuses more on the semblances of authenticity that emerges. To link the points highlighted in this paper, a discussion of soft power concerns relationships bonded through economic and cultural influence. Because favelas have become distinct attractions, it is cultural appeal and a different (residential) side of the city that persuades travellers to visit. Online and social media platforms for more than a decade now have played an important role today in projecting images and promoting authentic experiences based on user-perceptions, and this paper looks at how the users communicate their experiences.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas Wise & Maurício Polidoro & Gareth Hall & Ricardo Ricci Uvinha, 2019. "User-generated insight of Rio’s Rocinha favela tour: Authentic attraction or vulnerable living environment?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(7), pages 680-698, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:34:y:2019:i:7:p:680-698
    DOI: 10.1177/0269094219889881
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0269094219889881
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0269094219889881?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donya Saberi & Cody Morris Paris & Belisa Marochi, 2018. "Soft power and place branding in the United Arab Emirates: examples of the tourism and film industries," International Journal of Diplomacy and Economy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(1), pages 44-58.
    2. Munar, Ana María & Jacobsen, Jens Kr. Steen, 2014. "Motivations for sharing tourism experiences through social media," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 46-54.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicholas Wise, 2020. "Urban and Rural Event Tourism and Sustainability: Exploring Economic, Social and Environmental Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-5, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bilgihan, Anil & Barreda, Albert & Okumus, Fevzi & Nusair, Khaldoon, 2016. "Consumer perception of knowledge-sharing in travel-related Online Social Networks," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 287-296.
    2. Shiwei Shen & Marios Sotiriadis & Qing Zhou, 2020. "Could Smart Tourists Be Sustainable and Responsible as Well? The Contribution of Social Networking Sites to Improving Their Sustainable and Responsible Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Tribe, John & Mkono, Muchazondida, 2017. "Not such smart tourism? The concept of e-lienation," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 105-115.
    4. Palazzo, Maria & Vollero, Agostino & Vitale, Pierluigi & Siano, Alfonso, 2021. "Urban and rural destinations on Instagram: Exploring the influencers’ role in #sustainabletourism," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    5. Mohammad Tipu Sultan & Farzana Sharmin & Alina Badulescu & Darie Gavrilut & Ke Xue, 2021. "Social Media-Based Content towards Image Formation: A New Approach to the Selection of Sustainable Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, April.
    6. Alisa Kazakova & Meerim Karimova & Insin Kim, 2021. "Examining Rapport with Local People, International Students’ Roles through Travel Experience and Sustainable Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Dickinson, Janet E. & Hibbert, Julia F. & Filimonau, Viachaslau, 2016. "Mobile technology and the tourist experience: (Dis)connection at the campsite," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 193-201.
    8. Ćurlin, Tamara & Jaković, Božidar & Strugar, Ivan, 2018. "Analytics of Social Media: Perspective of Country Tourism Office," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2018), Split, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Split, Croatia, 6-8 September 2018, pages 49-59, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    9. Mohammed Jabreel & Assumpció Huertas & Antonio Moreno, 2018. "Semantic analysis and the evolution towards participative branding: Do locals communicate the same destination brand values as DMOs?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, November.
    10. Kuo-Yan Wang, 2022. "Sustainable Tourism Development Based upon Visitors’ Brand Trust: A Case of “100 Religious Attractions”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-30, February.
    11. Mihai F. Băcilă & Raluca Ciornea & Luiza M. Souca & Alexandra M. Drule, 2022. "Content Analysis on Sustainability Dimensions in DMOs’ Social Media Videos Advertising the World’s Most Visited Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    12. Jezierski Adam & Wszendybył-Skulska Ewa & Kopera Sebastian, 2022. "Crisis-Resistant Tourists – A Study of Hotel Online Reviews in the Times of Covid-19," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 29(4), pages 29-36, December.
    13. Assumpcio Huertas & Estela Marine-Roig, 2016. "User reactions to destination brand contents in social media," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 291-315, January.
    14. Jahn, Steffen & Cornwell, T. Bettina & Drengner, Jan & Gaus, Hansjoerg, 2018. "Temporary communitas and willingness to return to events," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 329-338.
    15. Simona Franzoni & Michelle Bonera, 2019. "How DMO Can Measure the Experiences of a Large Territory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, January.
    16. Lee, Joseph Lok-Man & Lau, Chammy Yan-Lam & Wong, Charlaine Wai-Ga, 2023. "Reexamining brand loyalty and brand awareness with social media marketing: A collectivist country perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 9(2), pages 3-10.
    17. Hanafi Hussin, 2018. "Gastronomy, Tourism, and the Soft Power of Malaysia," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(4), pages 21582440188, October.
    18. DongHee Kim & SooCheong Shawn Jang, 2019. "The psychological and motivational aspects of restaurant experience sharing behavior on social networking sites," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 13(1), pages 25-49, March.
    19. Molinillo, Sebastian & Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco & Anaya-Sánchez, Rafael & Buhalis, Dimitrios, 2018. "DMO online platforms: Image and intention to visit," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 116-130.
    20. Revilla Hernández, Mercedes & Santana Talavera, Agustín & Parra López, Eduardo, 2016. "Effects of co-creation in a tourism destination brand image through twitter," MPRA Paper 77595, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 21 Nov 2016.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:34:y:2019:i:7:p:680-698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.