IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joudef/v15y2018i4p471-481.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A method of assessing the time-variant value of multi-domain architectures

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Ford
  • David Meyer
  • John Colombi
  • Brian Scheller
  • Cody Palmer

Abstract

Modeling and simulation continues to improve the ability to evaluate future complex concepts and conduct early systems analysis. While the systems engineering community now advocates model-based systems engineering, the actual integrated methods and tools need to be refined. This research synthesizes descriptive architectural depictions of multi-domain (air and space) concepts, simulates these concepts through a physics-based model, collects several performance metrics, and integrates them using value-focused thinking. The proposed method enables the assessment of alternatives whose value can increase or decrease over time, depending on the design properties and operational scenario. Three surveillance concepts are proposed, made up of a low-earth orbit satellite constellation, with varying payloads, and extended by an unmanned air system flying waypoints in the area of interest. Uniquely, this method shows promise of depicting time-variant value assessments of these concepts across the simulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Ford & David Meyer & John Colombi & Brian Scheller & Cody Palmer, 2018. "A method of assessing the time-variant value of multi-domain architectures," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 15(4), pages 471-481, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:471-481
    DOI: 10.1177/1548512916656291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1548512916656291
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1548512916656291?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ralph L. Keeney & Timothy L. McDaniels, 1992. "Value-Focused Thinking about Strategic Decisions at BC Hydro," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 94-109, December.
    2. Lee W. Wagenhals & Sajjad Haider & Alexander H. Levis, 2003. "Synthesizing executable models of object oriented architectures," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(4), pages 266-300.
    3. Gregory S. Parnell & G. Edgar Bennett & Joseph A. Engelbrecht & Richard Szafranski, 2002. "Improving Resource Allocation Within the National Reconnaissance Office," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 77-90, June.
    4. Renzhong Wang & Cihan H. Dagli, 2011. "Executable system architecting using systems modeling language in conjunction with colored Petri nets in a model‐driven systems development process," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 383-409, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ralph L. Keeney & Timothy L. McDaniels, 1999. "Identifying and Structuring Values to Guide Integrated Resource Planning at BC Gas," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(5), pages 651-662, October.
    2. Madson Bruno da Silva Monte & Danielle Costa Morais, 2019. "A Decision Model for Identifying and Solving Problems in an Urban Water Supply System," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(14), pages 4835-4848, November.
    3. Francis, Royce & Bekera, Behailu, 2014. "A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 90-103.
    4. Hobbs, Benjamin F & Horn, Graham TF, 1997. "Building public confidence in energy planning: a multimethod MCDM approach to demand-side planning at BC gas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 357-375, February.
    5. Dimitrios Gouglas & Kendall Hoyt & Elizabeth Peacocke & Aristidis Kaloudis & Trygve Ottersen & John-Arne Røttingen, 2019. "Setting Strategic Objectives for the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations: An Exploratory Decision Analysis Process," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 430-446, November.
    6. Donald L. Keefer & Craig W. Kirkwood & James L. Corner, 2004. "Perspective on Decision Analysis Applications, 1990–2001," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 1(1), pages 4-22, March.
    7. Roger Chapman Burk & Richard M. Nehring, 2023. "An Empirical Comparison of Rank-Based Surrogate Weights in Additive Multiattribute Decision Analysis," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 55-72, March.
    8. Shiva Abdoli & Sami Kara, 2017. "A Modelling Framework to Design Executable Logical Architecture of Engineering Systems," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(9), pages 1-75, September.
    9. Badami, Madhav G., 2004. "Environmental policy-making in a difficult context: motorized two-wheeled vehicle emissions in India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(16), pages 1861-1877, November.
    10. Keeney, Ralph L., 1996. "Value-focused thinking: Identifying decision opportunities and creating alternatives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 537-549, August.
    11. Liesiö, Juuso & Kee, Taeyoung & Malo, Pekka, 2024. "Modeling project interactions in multiattribute portfolio decision analysis: Axiomatic foundations and practical implications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(3), pages 988-1000.
    12. C-C Chang & R-S Chen, 2007. "Project advancement and its applications to multi-air-route quality budget allocation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(8), pages 1008-1020, August.
    13. R L Keeney & R M Oliver, 2005. "Designing win-win financial loan products for consumers and businesses," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(9), pages 1030-1040, September.
    14. Richard M. Anderson & Robert Clemen, 2013. "Toward an Improved Methodology to Construct and Reconcile Decision Analytic Preference Judgments," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 121-134, June.
    15. Robert T. Clemen & James E. Smith, 2009. "On the Choice of Baselines in Multiattribute Portfolio Analysis: A Cautionary Note," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 256-262, December.
    16. Dias, Luis C. & Antunes, Carlos Henggeler & Dantas, Guilherme & de Castro, Nivalde & Zamboni, Lucca, 2018. "A multi-criteria approach to sort and rank policies based on Delphi qualitative assessments and ELECTRE TRI: The case of smart grids in Brazil," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 100-111.
    17. Martin Jaffe & Odeh Al-Jayyousi, 2002. "Planning Models for Sustainable Water Resource Development," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(3), pages 309-322.
    18. Aliakbar Kamari & Stefan Jensen & Maria Leonhard Christensen & Steffen Petersen & Poul Henning Kirkegaard, 2018. "A hybrid Decision Support System for Generation of Holistic Renovation Scenarios—Cases of Energy Consumption, Investment Cost, and Thermal Indoor Comfort," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    19. Sarah Kusumastuti & Heather Rosoff & Richard S. John, 2019. "Characterizing Conflicting User Values for Cyber Authentication Using a Virtual Public Values Forum," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 157-171, September.
    20. Renzhong Wang & Cihan H. Dagli, 2011. "Executable system architecting using systems modeling language in conjunction with colored Petri nets in a model‐driven systems development process," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 383-409, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:471-481. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.