IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v33y1989i2p255-273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power, Alliance, and Major Wars, 1816-1975

Author

Listed:
  • Woosang Kim

    (Department of Political Science, Texas A&M University)

Abstract

For years, students of international politics have attempted to explain seemingly contradictory perspectives about the relationship between power distribution and the onset of war, and between alliance formation and the incidence of war. Power transition theorists claim that war is most likely when power is equally distributed among nations and that alliances have little or no impact on the likelihood of major wars, whereas balance-of-power theorists suggest that war is less likely when power is equally distributed and that alliances play a critical role in the incidence of war. In this research, several propositions suggested by the power transition theory are tested for major war cases from 1816 to 1975. The main findings show that alliances play a significant role in the incidence of major wars and that the probability of war increases when the two alliance coalitions, not the two nations in a dyad, have approximately equal power. These findings confirm neither the balance-of-power perspective nor the view of the power transition model. In addition, the power transition and the rate of growth hypotheses claimed by the power transition theory are not empirically supported.

Suggested Citation

  • Woosang Kim, 1989. "Power, Alliance, and Major Wars, 1816-1975," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 33(2), pages 255-273, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:33:y:1989:i:2:p:255-273
    DOI: 10.1177/0022002789033002004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002789033002004
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0022002789033002004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doran, Charles F. & Parsons, Wes, 1980. "War and the Cycle of Relative Power," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 74(4), pages 947-965, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan M. DiCicco & Jack S. Levy, 1999. "Power Shifts and Problem Shifts," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 43(6), pages 675-704, December.
    2. William R. Thompson & Karen A. Rasler, 1988. "War and Systemic Capability Reconcentration," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 32(2), pages 335-366, June.
    3. Gary Goertz & Paul F. Diehl, 1992. "Toward a Theory of International Norms," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(4), pages 634-664, December.
    4. Kelly M. Kadera, 1999. "The Power-Conflict Story: a Synopsis," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 17(2), pages 149-174, September.
    5. Indra de Soysa & John R. Oneal & Yong-Hee Park, 1997. "Testing Power-Transition Theory Using Alternative Measures of National Capabilities," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 41(4), pages 509-528, August.
    6. Francis A. Beer, 1983. "Trends in American Major War and Peace," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 27(4), pages 661-686, December.
    7. Brian M. Pollins, 2008. "Globalization and Armed Conflict Among Nations," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 25(3), pages 191-205, July.
    8. Paul Huth & D. Scott Bennett & Christopher Gelpi, 1992. "System Uncertainty, Risk Propensity, and International Conflict among the Great Powers," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(3), pages 478-517, September.
    9. William Moul, 2003. "Power Parity, Preponderance, and War between Great Powers, 1816-1989," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 47(4), pages 468-489, August.
    10. Lewis House & Michael Ward, 1988. "The behavioral power of nations: an analysis of verbal conflict using the equations of statistical equilibrium," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 167-189, June.
    11. Brock F. Tessman & Steve Chan, 2004. "Power Cycles, Risk Propensity, and Great-Power Deterrence," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 48(2), pages 131-153, April.
    12. Charles F. Doran, 1989. "Systemic Disequilibrium, Foreign Policy Role, and the Power Cycle," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 33(3), pages 371-401, September.
    13. Michael D. Intriligator, 1982. "Research on Conflict Theory," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 26(2), pages 307-327, June.
    14. Edward D. Mansfield, 1992. "The Concentration of Capabilities and the Onset of War," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(1), pages 3-24, March.
    15. Silverberg, Gerald, 2005. "When is a Wave a Wave? Long Waves as Empirical and Theoretical Constructs from a Complex Systems Perspective," Research Memorandum 014, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    16. William R. Thompson, 1986. "Polarity, the Long Cycle, and Global Power Warfare," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 30(4), pages 587-615, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:33:y:1989:i:2:p:255-273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.