IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/compsc/v17y1999i2p149-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Power-Conflict Story: a Synopsis

Author

Listed:
  • Kelly M. Kadera

    (The University of Iowa)

Abstract

The focus of this article is the development of a differential equations model that integrates balance of power and power transition theories. This integration is achieved by proposing three different conditions, each of which is associated with specialized conflict behavior. Extrapolation from the traditional theories' arguments about war to the forces governing the ebb and flow of conflict is another integration technique. Most notably, the formal model predicts three types of power transitions: deflections, tortoise and hare transitions, and single transitions. Only the single transition is similar to the type of transition predicted by power transition theory. The other two types are important because they account for unsuccessful challenges. Important differences in conflict patterns also distinguish the three transition types from one another. The model also makes predictions concerning the relationship between two rivals' conflict levels and the timing of conflict peaks. Using a case study for each of the three types of transitions, the predictions are tested using MID data supplemented with historical analyses. Empirical support is strong. Substantive conclusions include recommendations for slowing rates of reaction, cautions concerning the dangers of the post-transition phase, and advice for tortoises to conserve their resources. This project also advocates the usefulness of a broader collection of events data than is currently available and the possible need for variables that trace the evolution of bonds that tie nations together.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelly M. Kadera, 1999. "The Power-Conflict Story: a Synopsis," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 17(2), pages 149-174, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:17:y:1999:i:2:p:149-174
    DOI: 10.1177/073889429901700202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/073889429901700202
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/073889429901700202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doran, Charles F. & Parsons, Wes, 1980. "War and the Cycle of Relative Power," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 74(4), pages 947-965, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Huth & D. Scott Bennett & Christopher Gelpi, 1992. "System Uncertainty, Risk Propensity, and International Conflict among the Great Powers," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(3), pages 478-517, September.
    2. Jonathan M. DiCicco & Jack S. Levy, 1999. "Power Shifts and Problem Shifts," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 43(6), pages 675-704, December.
    3. William Moul, 2003. "Power Parity, Preponderance, and War between Great Powers, 1816-1989," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 47(4), pages 468-489, August.
    4. Lewis House & Michael Ward, 1988. "The behavioral power of nations: an analysis of verbal conflict using the equations of statistical equilibrium," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 167-189, June.
    5. William R. Thompson & Karen A. Rasler, 1988. "War and Systemic Capability Reconcentration," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 32(2), pages 335-366, June.
    6. Gary Goertz & Paul F. Diehl, 1992. "Toward a Theory of International Norms," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(4), pages 634-664, December.
    7. Brock F. Tessman & Steve Chan, 2004. "Power Cycles, Risk Propensity, and Great-Power Deterrence," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 48(2), pages 131-153, April.
    8. Charles F. Doran, 1989. "Systemic Disequilibrium, Foreign Policy Role, and the Power Cycle," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 33(3), pages 371-401, September.
    9. Michael D. Intriligator, 1982. "Research on Conflict Theory," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 26(2), pages 307-327, June.
    10. Edward D. Mansfield, 1992. "The Concentration of Capabilities and the Onset of War," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(1), pages 3-24, March.
    11. Indra de Soysa & John R. Oneal & Yong-Hee Park, 1997. "Testing Power-Transition Theory Using Alternative Measures of National Capabilities," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 41(4), pages 509-528, August.
    12. Francis A. Beer, 1983. "Trends in American Major War and Peace," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 27(4), pages 661-686, December.
    13. Brian M. Pollins, 2008. "Globalization and Armed Conflict Among Nations," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 25(3), pages 191-205, July.
    14. Woosang Kim, 1989. "Power, Alliance, and Major Wars, 1816-1975," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 33(2), pages 255-273, June.
    15. Silverberg, Gerald, 2005. "When is a Wave a Wave? Long Waves as Empirical and Theoretical Constructs from a Complex Systems Perspective," Research Memorandum 014, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    16. William R. Thompson, 1986. "Polarity, the Long Cycle, and Global Power Warfare," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 30(4), pages 587-615, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:17:y:1999:i:2:p:149-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.