IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v49y2024i4p565-594.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Psychometric Differences Between Fast Versus Slow Responses on Rating Scale Items

Author

Listed:
  • Nana Kim

    (University of Minnesota-Twin Cities)

  • Daniel M. Bolt

    (University of Wisconsin-Madison)

Abstract

Some previous studies suggest that response times (RTs) on rating scale items can be informative about the content trait, but a more recent study suggests they may also be reflective of response styles. The latter result raises questions about the possible consideration of RTs for content trait estimation, as response styles are generally viewed as nuisance dimensions in the measurement of noncognitive constructs. In this article, we extend previous work exploring the simultaneous relevance of content and response style traits on RTs in self-report rating scale measurement by examining psychometric differences related to fast versus slow item responses. Following a parallel methodology applied with cognitive measures, we provide empirical illustrations of how RTs appear to be simultaneously reflective of both content and response style traits. Our results demonstrate that respondents may exhibit different response behaviors for fast versus slow responses and that both the content trait and response styles are relevant to such heterogeneity. These findings suggest that using RTs as a basis for improving the estimation of noncognitive constructs likely requires simultaneously attending to the effects of response styles.

Suggested Citation

  • Nana Kim & Daniel M. Bolt, 2024. "Evaluating Psychometric Differences Between Fast Versus Slow Responses on Rating Scale Items," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 49(4), pages 565-594, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:49:y:2024:i:4:p:565-594
    DOI: 10.3102/10769986231195260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/10769986231195260
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/10769986231195260?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:49:y:2024:i:4:p:565-594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.