IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intare/v7y2004i2p89-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Anthropological Perspective on Culture in the Globalisation Debate

Author

Listed:
  • Kurt Tauchmann

Abstract

The aim of this short overview is to look at theoretic and methodical aspects in analysing culture as the result of aspirations for wellbeing. In that sense social groups base their identity on imagined common roots and descent. Within a historical dimension the phenomenon of global cultural networks is not confined to the European expansion to Africa, the Americas, Asia and Australia beginning in the late 15 th century but can be established for earlier periods with different shifting centres. One of these early global cultural networks developed through maritime migrations and trade, originating in the region of mainland and insular Southeast Asia, and materialised within the macro context of an emerging Oceanic culture. Cultural and social identities among local populations in that region are dominated by discourses controlled by dynastic elite's. Therefore, one cannot establish horizons of acculturation and social transformations and its associated culture, until the hardware of archaeological evidence is included. Along that line the gaps in a space, time and structure perspective on an Oceanic culture can be closed. Present diachronic studies in that direction also emphasise the importance of the devolution concept, because it can help to explain how and why polities and empires collapsed. In anthropological fieldwork research priority should be given to a holistic approach, which combines structural and systemic aspects.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurt Tauchmann, 2004. "An Anthropological Perspective on Culture in the Globalisation Debate," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 7(2), pages 89-108, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:7:y:2004:i:2:p:89-108
    DOI: 10.1177/223386590400700205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/223386590400700205
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/223386590400700205?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chaudhuri,K. N., 1985. "Trade and Civilisation in the Indian Ocean," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521285421, October.
    2. Chaudhuri,K. N., 1985. "Trade and Civilisation in the Indian Ocean," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521242264, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Studer, Roman, 2008. "India and the Great Divergence: Assessing the Efficiency of Grain Markets in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century India," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 68(2), pages 393-437, June.
    2. Avner Seror, 2021. "Social Roles," AMSE Working Papers 2134, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    3. Kevin H. O'Rourke & Jeffrey G. Williamson, 2009. "Did Vasco da Gama matter for European markets?1," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 62(3), pages 655-684, August.
    4. Timur Kuran & Anantdeep Singh, 2013. "Economic Modernization in Late British India: Hindu-Muslim Differences," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 61(3), pages 503-538.
    5. Abhilash Malayil, 2023. "Commercialisation and landed proprietorship on the Malabar Coast in the eighteenth century," The Indian Economic & Social History Review, , vol. 60(1), pages 5-36, January.
    6. repec:oxf:wpaper:68.2 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Williamson, Jeffrey G. & O'Rourke, Kevin, 2005. "Did Vasco da Gama Matter for European Markets? Testing Frederick Lane's Hypotheses Fifty Years Later," CEPR Discussion Papers 5418, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    8. Michalopoulos, Stelios & Naghavi, Alireza & Prarolo, Giovanni, 2016. "Islam, inequality and pre-industrial comparative development," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 86-98.
    9. Zizzo, Daniel John, 2002. "Racing with uncertainty: a patent race experiment," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 877-902, June.
    10. van Zanden, Jan Luiten & Buringh, Eltjo & Bosker, Maarten, 2008. "From Baghdad to London: The Dynamics of Urban Growth in Europe and the Arab World, 800-1800," CEPR Discussion Papers 6833, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    11. Adrian Pabst & Roberto Scazzieri, 2012. "The political economy of civil society," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 337-356, December.
    12. Ayman Reda, 2013. "Islam and Markets," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(1), pages 20-43, March.
    13. Sumit Majumdar & Davina Vora & Ashok Nag, 2012. "Legal form of the firm and overseas market choice in India’s software and IT industry," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 659-687, September.
    14. Antonios Garas & Sophie Guthmuller & Athanasios Lapatinas, 2021. "The development of nations conditions the disease space," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-35, January.
    15. Greg Clydesdale, 2007. "What Happened to Indian Supremacy? The Systemic Loss of Prosperity," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 305-328.
    16. Ellen L. Frost, 2009. "India’s Role in East Asia : Lessons from Cultural and Historical Linkages," Governance Working Papers 22781, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    17. Mehmet Bulut, 2009. "Reconsideration of Economic Views of a Classical Empire and a Nation‐State During the Mercantilist Ages," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(3), pages 791-828, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:7:y:2004:i:2:p:89-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.hufs.ac.kr/user/hufsenglish/re_1.jsp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.