IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indeco/v60y2023i1p5-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Commercialisation and landed proprietorship on the Malabar Coast in the eighteenth century

Author

Listed:
  • Abhilash Malayil

    (Department of History, Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit, Kerala, India)

Abstract

This article proposes a systemic connection between cash-crop gardening, commercialisation and individually-owned landed property in late eighteenth-century Malabar on the southwestern coast of India. The discussion starts with a focus on the English East India Company’s (EIC) early nineteenth-century investigations into land tenure and land tax. It identifies an agreement of opinion between two EIC revenue officers, Thomas Munro (d. 1827) and Francis Whyte Ellis (d. 1819), otherwise known to occupy rival intellectual positions. Both of them agreed on the existence of privately-owned landed assets in the region. This article calls this agreement ‘the Malabar consensus’ and argues that it was founded on an objective, if not intimate, examination of a set of specific historical conditions. The first section explores the tenurial category janmam or the aṭṭipēṟu of the eighteenth century and describes certain procedural innovations in the realm of landed and agrarian assets which mark a generalised transition along the coast of Malabar during the early modern centuries. The second section attempts to explain a set of economic opportunities that the aṭṭipēṟu stakeholders, finding themselves in a political and economic transition, found available in the eighteenth century. These innovations and the opportunities they provided were instrumental in creating a substantial class of parvenue landowners, and also an equally significant social class of share-croppers and wage-earners whose emergence characterised the early modern Malabar experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Abhilash Malayil, 2023. "Commercialisation and landed proprietorship on the Malabar Coast in the eighteenth century," The Indian Economic & Social History Review, , vol. 60(1), pages 5-36, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:indeco:v:60:y:2023:i:1:p:5-36
    DOI: 10.1177/00194646221148707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00194646221148707
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00194646221148707?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chaudhuri,K. N., 1985. "Trade and Civilisation in the Indian Ocean," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521285421, September.
    2. Shea, Thomas W., 1959. "Barriers to Economic Development in Traditional Societies: Malabar, A Case Study," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(4), pages 504-522, December.
    3. Chaudhuri,K. N., 1985. "Trade and Civilisation in the Indian Ocean," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521242264, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Studer, Roman, 2008. "India and the Great Divergence: Assessing the Efficiency of Grain Markets in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century India," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 68(2), pages 393-437, June.
    2. Avner Seror, 2021. "Social Roles," AMSE Working Papers 2134, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    3. Kevin H. O'Rourke & Jeffrey G. Williamson, 2009. "Did Vasco da Gama matter for European markets?1," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 62(3), pages 655-684, August.
    4. Timur Kuran & Anantdeep Singh, 2013. "Economic Modernization in Late British India: Hindu-Muslim Differences," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 61(3), pages 503-538.
    5. repec:oxf:wpaper:68.2 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Williamson, Jeffrey G. & O'Rourke, Kevin, 2005. "Did Vasco da Gama Matter for European Markets? Testing Frederick Lane's Hypotheses Fifty Years Later," CEPR Discussion Papers 5418, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Michalopoulos, Stelios & Naghavi, Alireza & Prarolo, Giovanni, 2016. "Islam, inequality and pre-industrial comparative development," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 86-98.
    8. Zizzo, Daniel John, 2002. "Racing with uncertainty: a patent race experiment," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 877-902, June.
    9. van Zanden, Jan Luiten & Buringh, Eltjo & Bosker, Maarten, 2008. "From Baghdad to London: The Dynamics of Urban Growth in Europe and the Arab World, 800-1800," CEPR Discussion Papers 6833, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. Adrian Pabst & Roberto Scazzieri, 2012. "The political economy of civil society," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 337-356, December.
    11. Ayman Reda, 2013. "Islam and Markets," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(1), pages 20-43, March.
    12. Sumit Majumdar & Davina Vora & Ashok Nag, 2012. "Legal form of the firm and overseas market choice in India’s software and IT industry," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 659-687, September.
    13. Antonios Garas & Sophie Guthmuller & Athanasios Lapatinas, 2021. "The development of nations conditions the disease space," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-35, January.
    14. Kurt Tauchmann, 2004. "An Anthropological Perspective on Culture in the Globalisation Debate," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 7(2), pages 89-108, September.
    15. Greg Clydesdale, 2007. "What Happened to Indian Supremacy? The Systemic Loss of Prosperity," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 305-328.
    16. Ellen L. Frost, 2009. "India’s Role in East Asia : Lessons from Cultural and Historical Linkages," Governance Working Papers 22781, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    17. Mehmet Bulut, 2009. "Reconsideration of Economic Views of a Classical Empire and a Nation‐State During the Mercantilist Ages," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(3), pages 791-828, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indeco:v:60:y:2023:i:1:p:5-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.