IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indgen/v23y2016i3p437-466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of the Work Environment: The Issue of Gender in Indian Scientific Research Institutes

Author

Listed:
  • Namrata Gupta

Abstract

Gender relations in organisations are a function of the socio-cultural and institutional context. This study analyses the perceptions of men and women scientists in India with respect to their work environment. It indicates that the twin aspects of Indian culture, patriarchy and hierarchy, contribute to a masculine environment at the workplace. Idealisation of women’s family roles as part of ‘Indian culture’ depresses women’s position as scientists. The hierarchical culture affects junior women scientists particularly through structural inefficiencies and gendered methods to subvert hierarchy. Since the Indian social milieu is in transition, changes are slowly taking place within organisations, offering hope for a change in gendered work environments. In exploring solutions to gender problems and understanding gender relations, the specific national context needs to be highlighted.

Suggested Citation

  • Namrata Gupta, 2016. "Perceptions of the Work Environment: The Issue of Gender in Indian Scientific Research Institutes," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 23(3), pages 437-466, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:indgen:v:23:y:2016:i:3:p:437-466
    DOI: 10.1177/0971521516656079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0971521516656079
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0971521516656079?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mamta Sood & R.K. Chadda, 2010. "Women in Medicine," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 17(2), pages 277-285, June.
    2. B. M. Gupta & Suresh Kumar & B. S. Aggarwal, 1999. "A comparision of productivity of male and female scientists of CSIR," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 45(2), pages 269-289, June.
    3. Reena Patel & Mary Jane C. Parmentier, 2005. "The Persistence of Traditional Gender Roles in the Information Technology Sector: A Study of Female Engineers in India," Information Technologies and International Development, MIT Press, vol. 2(3), pages 29-46.
    4. Mathai Joseph & Andrew Robinson, 2014. "Policy: Free Indian science," Nature, Nature, vol. 508(7494), pages 36-38, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thelwall, Mike & Bailey, Carol & Makita, Meiko & Sud, Pardeep & Madalli, Devika P., 2019. "Gender and research publishing in India: Uniformly high inequality?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 118-131.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang Yu & Gros Tristen & Mao En, 2021. "Gender Disparity in Students’ Choices of Information Technology Majors," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 80-95, May.
    2. Woszczynski, Amy B. & Dembla, Pamila & Zafar, Humayun, 2016. "Gender-based differences in culture in the Indian IT workplace," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 507-519.
    3. Kristof Witte & Nicky Rogge, 2010. "To publish or not to publish? On the aggregation and drivers of research performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(3), pages 657-680, December.
    4. K. C. Garg & S. Kumar, 2014. "Scientometric profile of Indian scientific output in life sciences with a focus on the contributions of women scientists," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 1771-1783, March.
    5. Thu-Trang Vuong & Hong Kong T. Nguyen & Tung Manh Ho & Toan Manh Ho & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2017. "The (In)Significance of Socio-Demographic Factors as Possible Determinants of Vietnamese Social Scientists’ Contribution-Adjusted Productivity: Preliminary Results from 2008–2017 Scopus Data," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Ali Uzun, 2002. "Productivity ratings of institutions based on publication in Scientometrics, Informetrics, and Bibliometrics, 1981–2000," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 53(3), pages 297-307, March.
    7. Felix Akpojene Ogbo & Mansi Vijaybhai Dhami & Ebere Maureen Ude & Praween Senanayake & Uchechukwu L. Osuagwu & Akorede O. Awosemo & Pascal Ogeleka & Blessing Jaka Akombi & Osita Kingsley Ezeh & Kingsl, 2019. "Enablers and Barriers to the Utilization of Antenatal Care Services in India," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote & Rocío Gómez-Crisóstomo & Luz María Romo-Fernández & Félix Moya-Anegón, 2009. "Visibility and responsibility of women in research papers through the order of signatures: the case of the University of Extremadura, 1990–2005," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 81(1), pages 225-238, October.
    9. Timur Narbaev & Diana Amirbekova, 2021. "Research Productivity in Emerging Economies: Empirical Evidence from Kazakhstan," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Rebecca Long & Aleta Crawford & Michael White & Kimberly Davis, 2009. "Determinants of faculty research productivity in information systems: An empirical analysis of the impact of academic origin and academic affiliation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 78(2), pages 231-260, February.
    11. Anindita Paul & Krishnan TN & Hugh Scullion, 2018. "Career Progression of Women in the Indian IT Sector: Matching Talent Management Practices and Employee Perspectives," Working papers 274, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    12. Varsha Singh, 2018. "Comparing research productivity of returnee-PhDs in science, engineering, and the social sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(3), pages 1241-1252, June.
    13. Katarina Prpić, 2002. "Gender and productivity differentials in science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 55(1), pages 27-58, September.
    14. Carlo Caputo & Jaime Requena & Domingo Vargas, 2012. "Life sciences research in Venezuela," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(3), pages 781-805, March.
    15. Frode Eika Sandnes, 2018. "Do Norwegian academics who publish more earn higher salaries?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(1), pages 263-281, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indgen:v:23:y:2016:i:3:p:437-466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.