IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v73y2020i2p281-311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating Conflict: A Proposed Framework for the Interdisciplinary Study of Workplace Conflict and Its Management

Author

Listed:
  • Ariel Avgar

Abstract

This article contributes to existing conflict research by proposing a theoretical framework capable of integrating findings and insights across distinct disciplines. The author utilizes the Kochan, Katz, and McKersie (1986) three-tiered industrial relations framework and demonstrates its unique capacity to situate and organize what we know about conflict and to highlight areas that have been neglected as a result of disciplinary fragmentation. The article reviews key themes, findings, and insights advanced by organizational behavior, industrial relations, and legal scholars. The author identifies the barriers associated with disciplinary boundaries and the costs these have had in terms of our current understanding of conflict in organizations. This review also examines potential areas of integration in the study of conflict and their implications for existing scholarship. Finally, the author proposes theoretical linkages that stem from the integration of conflict insights across disciplines, which serve as the basis for a future research agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • Ariel Avgar, 2020. "Integrating Conflict: A Proposed Framework for the Interdisciplinary Study of Workplace Conflict and Its Management," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 73(2), pages 281-311, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:73:y:2020:i:2:p:281-311
    DOI: 10.1177/0019793919885819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0019793919885819
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0019793919885819?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Casey Ichniowski, 1986. "The Effects of Grievance Activity on Productivity," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 40(1), pages 75-89, October.
    2. Jeanne M. Brett & Stephen B. Goldberg, 1983. "Grievance Mediation in the Coal Industry: A Field Experiment," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 37(1), pages 49-69, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ariel C. Avgar, 2021. "Relational Exchange in Non-union Firms: A Configurational Framework for Workplace Dispute Resolution and Voice," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 74(3), pages 607-636, May.
    2. Michael David Maffie, 2023. "Becoming a pirate: Independence as an alternative to exit in the gig economy," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 61(1), pages 46-67, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dionne Pohler & Andrew Luchak, 2015. "Are Unions Good or Bad for Organizations? The Moderating Role of Management's Response," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 53(3), pages 423-459, September.
    2. John T. Addison & Paulino Teixeira, 2020. "Trust and Workplace Performance," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 58(4), pages 874-903, December.
    3. Casey Ichniowski & Kathryn Shaw & Giovanna Prennushi, 1995. "The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity," NBER Working Papers 5333, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Alexander J. S. Colvin, 2013. "Participation Versus Procedures in Non-Union Dispute Resolution," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52, pages 259-283, January.
    5. Herm Joosten & Josée M. M. Bloemer & Bas Hillebrand, 2016. "The Effects of Third-Party Arbitration: A Field Experiment," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 585-610, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:73:y:2020:i:2:p:281-311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.