IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v43y1990i5p587-603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Influencing the Effect of Joint Union-Management Programs on Employee-Supervisor Relations

Author

Listed:
  • William N. Cooke

Abstract

This study tests a model in which programmatic features of joint union-management programs, the exercise of relative power options by employers, and organizational constraints are hypothesized to influence the intensity of collaborative efforts and, in turn, changes in employee-supervisor relations. An analysis of survey responses provided in 1986 by 92 unionized manufacturing plants having formalized joint programs generally supports the model. The results suggest, for example, that improvements in employee-supervisor relations are more likely when joint programs are structured to have highly active team-based efforts and substantial union leader participation; when programs are in their first few years of activities; when there has been either substantial growth or substantial decline in employment levels; and when the employer has refrained from subcontracting out bargaining unit work.

Suggested Citation

  • William N. Cooke, 1990. "Factors Influencing the Effect of Joint Union-Management Programs on Employee-Supervisor Relations," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 43(5), pages 587-603, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:43:y:1990:i:5:p:587-603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ilr.sagepub.com/content/43/5/587.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amanda Pyman & Peter Holland & Julian Teicher & Brian K. Cooper, 2010. "Industrial Relations Climate, Employee Voice and Managerial Attitudes to Unions: An Australian Study," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 48(2), pages 460-480, June.
    2. David G. Meyer & William N. Cooke, 1993. "US Labour Relations in Transition: Emerging Strategies and Company Performance," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 31(4), pages 531-552, December.
    3. Alshahrani Ahmed Saeed A & Alqahtani Abdulaziz Mubark & Alshahrani Bander Sayaf Z, 2015. "Exploring Human Resource Management System of Saudi Electricity Company: A Review of Policies for Effective Workforce Management," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 1(4), pages 25-40, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:43:y:1990:i:5:p:587-603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.