IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/iimkoz/v9y2020i2p143-151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting Penetration of the Project Buffer Time of Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM) Using a Linear Programming Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Milind Jagtap

Abstract

Managing the disruptions in projects is a challenging task for project managers. In this respect, critical chain project management (CCPM) has been considered as a promising methodology in expediting projects. However, the effectiveness of this methodology is often lost in search of optimal use of project buffers to hedge against delays occurring in the critical chain. The more critical chain activity gets delayed, the greater is the likelihood of penetration of project buffer time. The resource constraints of critical chains have been considered as a major determinant of project buffer penetration. Although a project buffer is provided to protect the critical chain, to keep the CCPM project schedule competitive, it is the priority of the project manager to minimize the blatant consumption of project buffer time by multiple critical chain activities. Historically, resource constraints within the critical chain have been associated with penetration of project buffer time. The literature suggests that the productivity of resources deployed in the critical chain can predict the penetration of project buffer time. Based on the premise that delays are omnipresent and unavoidable but predictable, this research aims to consider the post-facto measures of delays instead of pre-facto measures. Pre-facto measures are resources productivity and resources availability while post-facto measures are the compensation paid by the client and the cost of liquidity damages incurred by the contractor. It is assumed that pre-facto measures are convertible into post-facto measures. A linear programming model is formulated and tested using the case of Botanical Garden Construction Project in Pune city. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the propensity of project buffer penetration on a critical chain varies with the compensation matrix. Varieties of scenario are developed and the optimal solution is validated with the case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Milind Jagtap, 2020. "Predicting Penetration of the Project Buffer Time of Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM) Using a Linear Programming Approach," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 9(2), pages 143-151, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:iimkoz:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:143-151
    DOI: 10.1177/2277975219896499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2277975219896499
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2277975219896499?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. François Berthaut & Robert Pellerin & Adnène Hajji & Nathalie Perrier, 2018. "A path relinking-based scatter search for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 1-36.
    2. Qiaolin Yuan & Yiannis E. Polychronakis, 2012. "The development of a robust resource constrained project scheduling framework," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(4), pages 339-367.
    3. Maryam Mirzaei & Victoria J. Mabin, 2018. "A review of the scholarly literature on CCPM: a focus on underpinning assumptions," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(3), pages 242-267.
    4. Hosein Iranmanesh & Fatemeh Mansourian & Samaneh Kouchaki, 2016. "Critical chain scheduling: a new approach for feeding buffer sizing," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 25(1), pages 114-130.
    5. Toshihisa Fujiwara & Hiroshi Morita & Haruhiko Suwa, 2016. "Dynamic project scheduling with reduction of activity durations," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(3), pages 259-274.
    6. Zhang, Junguang & Song, Xiwei & Díaz, Estrella, 2016. "Project buffer sizing of a critical chain based on comprehensive resource tightness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 174-182.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junguang Zhang & Dan Wan, 2021. "Determination of early warning time window for bottleneck resource buffer," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(1), pages 289-305, May.
    2. Xabier A. Martin & Rosa Herrero & Angel A. Juan & Javier Panadero, 2024. "An Agile Adaptive Biased-Randomized Discrete-Event Heuristic for the Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    3. She, Bingling & Chen, Bo & Hall, Nicholas G., 2021. "Buffer sizing in critical chain project management by network decomposition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Xuejun Hu & Jianjiang Wang & Kaijun Leng, 2019. "The Interaction Between Critical Chain Sequencing, Buffer Sizing, and Reactive Actions in a CC/BM Framework," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(03), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Mohammadreza Sharifi Ghazvini & Vahidreza Ghezavati & Sadigh Raissi & Ahmad Makui, 2017. "An Integrated Efficiency–Risk Approach in Sustainable Project Control," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi & Zwikael, Ofer, 2021. "Integrating risk into estimations of project activities' time and cost: A stratified approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 482-490.
    7. Guofeng Ma & Jianyao Jia & Tiancheng Zhu & Shan Jiang, 2019. "A Critical Design Structure Method for Project Schedule Development under Rework Risks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Öncü Hazir & Gündüz Ulusoy, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," Post-Print hal-02898162, HAL.
    9. Ripon K. Chakrabortty & Ruhul A. Sarker & Daryl L. Essam, 2020. "Single mode resource constrained project scheduling with unreliable resources," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1369-1403, September.
    10. Hazır, Öncü & Ulusoy, Gündüz, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    11. Junguang Zhang & Xiwei Song & Estrella Díaz, 2017. "Critical chain project buffer sizing based on resource constraints," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(3), pages 671-683, February.
    12. Guofeng Ma & Shan Jiang & Tiancheng Zhu & Jianyao Jia, 2019. "A Novel Method of Developing Construction Projects Schedule under Rework Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-25, October.
    13. Xuejun Hu & Erik Demeulemeester & Nanfang Cui & Jianjiang Wang & Wendi Tian, 2017. "Improved critical chain buffer management framework considering resource costs and schedule stability," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 159-183, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:iimkoz:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:143-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.