IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v338y2024i1d10.1007_s10479-024-05895-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new proactive and reactive approach for resource-constrained project scheduling problem under activity and resource disruption: a scenario-based robust optimization approach

Author

Listed:
  • Maziar Khoshsirat

    (Shahed University)

  • Seyed Meysam Mousavi

    (Shahed University)

Abstract

This paper introduces a novel two-phase framework for designing a proactive–reactive scheduling model in the multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem under disruptions. The proactive phase involves constructing a resilient baseline scheduling model using a mixed-integer linear programming model. This phase contributes to a multi-objective model that minimizes the project completion time and total project cost while maximizing resilience criteria. In this context, resilience refers to allocating float time to project activities to protect their start and finish times against future disruptions as much as possible. The reactive phase involves a bi-objective mathematical model that mitigates the impact of disruptions through preempt-repeat, preempt-resume, and activity-crashing strategies. Real-world projects involve many uncertain parameters that can negatively affect the optimization of rescheduling problems if overlooked. Therefore, for the first time, a scenario-based robust optimization approach is proposed to cope with the uncertainty of the reactive phase. Additionally, a novel hybrid multi-objective method based on goal programming is introduced to solve the proposed multi-objective model. Finally, to demonstrate the capability of the proposed approach, an oil and gas project in Iran is regarded as a real case study. The results indicate that the negative impact of disruptions on the makespan and total cost of the project can be largely mitigated by considering resilience criteria in the proactive phase and preempt-repeat, preempt-resume, and activity-crashing strategies in the reactive phase.

Suggested Citation

  • Maziar Khoshsirat & Seyed Meysam Mousavi, 2024. "A new proactive and reactive approach for resource-constrained project scheduling problem under activity and resource disruption: a scenario-based robust optimization approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(1), pages 597-643, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:338:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-024-05895-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-024-05895-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-024-05895-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-024-05895-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jürgen Kuster & Dietmar Jannach & Gerhard Friedrich, 2010. "Applying Local Rescheduling in response to schedule disruptions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 265-282, November.
    2. Burgelman, Jeroen & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2020. "Project schedule performance under general mode implementation disruptions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 280(1), pages 295-311.
    3. J Alcaraz & C Maroto & R Ruiz, 2003. "Solving the Multi-Mode Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem with genetic algorithms," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(6), pages 614-626, June.
    4. Herroelen, Willy & Leus, Roel, 2005. "Project scheduling under uncertainty: Survey and research potentials," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 289-306, September.
    5. Weibo Zheng & Zhengwen He & Nengmin Wang & Tao Jia, 2018. "Proactive and reactive resource-constrained max-NPV project scheduling with random activity duration," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(1), pages 115-126, January.
    6. Deblaere, Filip & Demeulemeester, Erik & Herroelen, Willy, 2011. "Proactive policies for the stochastic resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 308-316, October.
    7. Bowen Guo & Wei Zhan, 2023. "Research on Integrated Scheduling of Multi-Mode Emergency Rescue for Flooding in Chemical Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Morteza Davari & Erik Demeulemeester, 2019. "Important classes of reactions for the proactive and reactive resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 274(1), pages 187-210, March.
    9. Qiaolin Yuan & Yiannis E. Polychronakis, 2012. "The development of a robust resource constrained project scheduling framework," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(4), pages 339-367.
    10. Yu, Chian-Son & Li, Han-Lin, 2000. "A robust optimization model for stochastic logistic problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-3), pages 385-397, March.
    11. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1957. "Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(1), pages 38-91, October.
    12. Ripon K. Chakrabortty & Ruhul A. Sarker & Daryl L. Essam, 2020. "Single mode resource constrained project scheduling with unreliable resources," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1369-1403, September.
    13. Morteza Davari & Erik Demeulemeester, 2019. "The proactive and reactive resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 211-237, April.
    14. John M. Mulvey & Robert J. Vanderbei & Stavros A. Zenios, 1995. "Robust Optimization of Large-Scale Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 264-281, April.
    15. Abd El-Wahed, Waiel F. & Lee, Sang M., 2006. "Interactive fuzzy goal programming for multi-objective transportation problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 158-166, April.
    16. Olivier Lambrechts & Erik Demeulemeester & Willy Herroelen, 2011. "Time slack-based techniques for robust project scheduling subject to resource uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 443-464, June.
    17. Kolisch, Rainer & Sprecher, Arno, 1997. "PSPLIB - A project scheduling problem library : OR Software - ORSEP Operations Research Software Exchange Program," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 205-216, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Balouka, Noemie & Cohen, Izack, 2021. "A robust optimization approach for the multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 457-470.
    2. Farnaz Torabi Yeganeh & Seyed Hessameddin Zegordi, 2020. "A multi-objective optimization approach to project scheduling with resiliency criteria under uncertain activity duration," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 285(1), pages 161-196, February.
    3. Hazır, Öncü & Ulusoy, Gündüz, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    4. Öncü Hazir & Gündüz Ulusoy, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," Post-Print hal-02898162, HAL.
    5. Seyed Babak Ebrahimi & Ehsan Bagheri, 2022. "A multi-objective formulation for the closed-loop plastic supply chain under uncertainty," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 4725-4768, November.
    6. Brčić, Mario & Katić, Marija & Hlupić, Nikica, 2019. "Planning horizons based proactive rescheduling for stochastic resource-constrained project scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 58-66.
    7. Karakaya, Sırma & Balcik, Burcu, 2024. "Developing a national pandemic vaccination calendar under supply uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    8. Majid Askarifard & Hamidreza Abbasianjahromi & Mehran Sepehri & Ehsanollah Zeighami, 2021. "A robust multi-objective optimization model for project scheduling considering risk and sustainable development criteria," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 11494-11524, August.
    9. Alfredo S. Ramos & Pablo A. Miranda-Gonzalez & Samuel Nucamendi-Guillén & Elias Olivares-Benitez, 2023. "A Formulation for the Stochastic Multi-Mode Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem Solved with a Multi-Start Iterated Local Search Metaheuristic," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-25, January.
    10. Nesbitt, Peter & Blake, Lewis R. & Lamas, Patricio & Goycoolea, Marcos & Pagnoncelli, Bernardo K. & Newman, Alexandra & Brickey, Andrea, 2021. "Underground mine scheduling under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 340-352.
    11. Zuo, Fei & Zio, Enrico & Xu, Yue, 2023. "Bi-objective optimization of the scheduling of risk-related resources for risk response," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    12. Hashem Omrani & Farzane Adabi & Narges Adabi, 2017. "Designing an efficient supply chain network with uncertain data: a robust optimization—data envelopment analysis approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(7), pages 816-828, July.
    13. Tsai, Jung-Fa, 2007. "An optimization approach for supply chain management models with quantity discount policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 982-994, March.
    14. Morteza Davari & Erik Demeulemeester, 2019. "The proactive and reactive resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 211-237, April.
    15. Antonio G. Martín & Manuel Díaz-Madroñero & Josefa Mula, 2020. "Master production schedule using robust optimization approaches in an automobile second-tier supplier," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(1), pages 143-166, March.
    16. Moukrim, Aziz & Quilliot, Alain & Toussaint, Hélène, 2015. "An effective branch-and-price algorithm for the Preemptive Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problem based on minimal Interval Order Enumeration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(2), pages 360-368.
    17. Lamas, Patricio & Goycoolea, Marcos & Pagnoncelli, Bernardo & Newman, Alexandra, 2024. "A target-time-windows technique for project scheduling under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 792-806.
    18. Ripon K. Chakrabortty & Ruhul A. Sarker & Daryl L. Essam, 2020. "Single mode resource constrained project scheduling with unreliable resources," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1369-1403, September.
    19. Alireza Etminaniesfahani & Hanyu Gu & Leila Moslemi Naeni & Amir Salehipour, 2024. "An efficient relax-and-solve method for the multi-mode resource constrained project scheduling problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(1), pages 41-68, July.
    20. Hanks, Robert W. & Weir, Jeffery D. & Lunday, Brian J., 2017. "Robust goal programming using different robustness echelons via norm-based and ellipsoidal uncertainty sets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 636-646.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:338:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-024-05895-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.