IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/iimkoz/v3y2014i2p135-148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Analysis of Sustainability Disclosure Practices: Evidence from India and China

Author

Listed:
  • Aparna Bhatia

    (Aparna Bhatia, Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce and Business Management, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar. E-mail: aparnamohindru@yahoo.co.in)

  • Siya Tuli

    (Siya Tuli, Senior Research Fellow, Department of Commerce and Business Management, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar. E-mail: siyatuli@yahoo.com)

Abstract

The present study seeks to access and compare the sustainability reporting practices in two major economies, that is, India and China. Index developed under global reporting initiative (GRI) guidelines is used. Content analysis is employed as a data collection tool. A total of 17 companies from BSE-30 (India) and 19 companies from SSE 50 (China), producing sustainability reports within the time period 2006–2007 to 2010–2011, comprise the sample set. Independent sample t test is used to compare the disclosure practices of India and China. Also, Kruskal–Wallis H test is applied for inter-category and inter-industry comparison of both countries. The results reveal that the sustainability disclosure scores are higher with respect to Indian companies as compared to Chinese companies. The results of independent sample t test are also significant at 1 per cent level of significance. However, Kruskal–Wallis H test suggests insignificant differences in the category-wise and industry-wise disclosure scores of both countries, that is, India and China. It is strongly recommended that China should strive more for sustainability practices in order to keep pace with its counterpart, that is, India.

Suggested Citation

  • Aparna Bhatia & Siya Tuli, 2014. "An Empirical Analysis of Sustainability Disclosure Practices: Evidence from India and China," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 3(2), pages 135-148, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:iimkoz:v:3:y:2014:i:2:p:135-148
    DOI: 10.1177/2277975214542057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2277975214542057
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2277975214542057?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Guthrie & Federica Farneti, 2008. "GRI Sustainability Reporting by Australian Public Sector Organizations," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(6), pages 361-366, December.
    2. Henning Madsen & Knud Sinding & John P. Ulhøi, 1997. "Sustainability and corporate environmental focus: an analysis of Danish small and medium sized companies," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(6), pages 443-453.
    3. Shaomin Li & Marc Fetscherin & Ilan Alon & Christoph Lattemann & Kuang Yeh, 2010. "Corporate Social Responsibility in Emerging Markets," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 635-654, October.
    4. A. Sahay, 2004. "Environmental reporting by Indian corporations," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 12-22, March.
    5. Sunee Ratanajongkol & Howard Davey & Mary Low, 2006. "Corporate social reporting in Thailand: The news is all good and increasing," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 3(1), pages 67-83, April.
    6. Quick, Reiner, 2008. "Voluntary Sustainability Reporting Practices in Germany: A Study on Reporting Quality," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 35699, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    7. Bikram Chatterjee & Monir Zaman Mir, 2008. "The current status of environmental reporting by Indian companies," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(6), pages 609-629, June.
    8. Anita Jose & Shang-Mei Lee, 2007. "Environmental Reporting of Global Corporations: A Content Analysis based on Website Disclosures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 72(4), pages 307-321, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Jessop & Nicole Wilson & Michal Bardecki & Cory Searcy, 2019. "Corporate Environmental Disclosure in India: An Analysis of Multinational and Domestic Agrochemical Corporations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-33, September.
    2. Priyanka Verma & Anupam Singh, 2016. "Fostering Stakeholders Trust through CSR Reporting: An Analytical Focus," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 5(2), pages 186-199, July.
    3. Wajeeha Aslam & Syed Tehseen Jawaid, 2023. "Systematic Review of Green Banking Adoption: Following PRISMA Protocols," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 12(2), pages 213-233, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aparna Bhatia & Siya Tuli, 2015. "Sustainability Disclosure Practices: A Study of Selected Chinese Companies," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 40(3-4), pages 268-283, August.
    2. Aparna Bhatia & Siya Tuli, 2017. "Sustainability Reporting under G3 Guidelines: A Study on Constituents of Bovespa Index," Vision, , vol. 21(2), pages 204-213, June.
    3. Matthias S. Fifka, 2013. "Corporate Responsibility Reporting and its Determinants in Comparative Perspective – a Review of the Empirical Literature and a Meta‐analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 1-35, January.
    4. Priyanka Verma & Anupam Singh, 2016. "Fostering Stakeholders Trust through CSR Reporting: An Analytical Focus," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 5(2), pages 186-199, July.
    5. Hui-Cheng Yu & Lopin Kuo & Beiling Ma, 2020. "The Drivers of Corporate Water Disclosure in Enhancing Information Transparency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Thomas A. Tsalis & Maria Terzaki & Dimitrios Koulouriotis & Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis & Ioannis E. Nikolaou, 2023. "The nexus of United Nations' 2030 Agenda and corporate sustainability reports," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 784-796, April.
    7. Anna Jessop & Nicole Wilson & Michal Bardecki & Cory Searcy, 2019. "Corporate Environmental Disclosure in India: An Analysis of Multinational and Domestic Agrochemical Corporations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-33, September.
    8. María del Mar Miras-Rodríguez & Domingo Martínez-Martínez & Bernabé Escobar-Pérez, 2018. "Which Corporate Governance Mechanisms Drive CSR Disclosure Practices in Emerging Countries?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Farah Zamir & Abubakr Saeed, 2020. "Location matters: Impact of geographical proximity to financial centers on corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in emerging economies," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 263-295, March.
    10. Ram Nayan Yadava & Bhaskar Sinha, 2016. "Scoring Sustainability Reports Using GRI 2011 Guidelines for Assessing Environmental, Economic, and Social Dimensions of Leading Public and Private Indian Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 549-558, October.
    11. Ezhilarasi G. & K. C. Kabra, 2017. "The Impact of Corporate Governance Attributes on Environmental Disclosures: Evidence from India," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 10(1), pages 24-43, June.
    12. Davide Giacomini & Paola Zola & Diego Paredi & Mario Mazzoleni, 2020. "Environmental disclosure and stakeholder engagement via social media: State of the art and potential in public utilities," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1552-1564, July.
    13. Tian Luan, 2024. "A Review of Corporate Social Responsibility Decoupling and Its Impact: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Nhat Minh Tran, 2022. "CEO and Chairperson Characteristics and Corporate Environmental Performance: A Study of Cooperatives in Vietnam," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    15. David Carassus & Damien Gardey & Christophe Maurel, 2011. "Les démarches locales de performance publique face à la LOLF : mimétisme ou innovation ?," Post-Print hal-02431106, HAL.
    16. Nan Zhang & Qiaozhuan Liang & Huiying Li & Xiao Wang, 2022. "The organizational relationship–based political connection and debt financing: Evidence from Chinese private firms," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 69-105, January.
    17. repec:jtr:journl:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:29-42 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Puneeta Goel & Rupali Misra, 2017. "Sustainability Reporting in India: Exploring Sectoral Differences and Linkages with Financial Performance," Vision, , vol. 21(2), pages 214-224, June.
    19. Laura Corazza & Simone Domenico Scagnelli & Chiara Mio, 2017. "Simulacra and Sustainability Disclosure: Analysis of the Interpretative Models of Creating Shared Value," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5), pages 414-434, September.
    20. Xing, Yijun & Liu, Yipeng & Lattemann, Christoph, 2020. "Institutional logics and social enterprises: Entry mode choices of foreign hospitals in China," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(5).
    21. Zanellato Gianluca, 2021. "Quality of Information Disclosed in Integrated Reports, in the Extracting Sector: Insights from Europe," Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, Sciendo, vol. 66(3), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:iimkoz:v:3:y:2014:i:2:p:135-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.