IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v17y2016i4p905-920.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Customer-based Brand Equity: A Study of Public and Private Banks

Author

Listed:
  • Sangeeta Arora
  • Neha

Abstract

The financial services sector has come a long way from arguing that banks are beyond branding to a phase where banks and other financial institutions are using branding strategically—like any other business. Banks have adopted various customer-centric strategies in order to develop a positive perception in the minds of customers. To develop and implement customer-centric strategies, banks need to provide a consistent brand experience to prevent customers from switching to rival banks. In order to understand the customer perception towards bank brand, there is a need to understand the concept of customer-based brand equity and its main determinants. The customer-based brand equity is a set of brand-related associations held by the consumers in their memory (Keller, 1993). The current article aims to identify the various determinants of customer-based brand equity in the banking industry and to verify whether these determinants vary across bank types. For this purpose, a structured questionnaire was developed and a sample of 120 respondents was taken from selected public sector banks and private sector banks of Jalandhar. Factor analysis produced six factors, that is, brand investments, brand performance, brand salience, brand verdict, brand feelings and brand unfamiliarity, which accounted for 73 per cent variance. The findings revealed that out of the six factors extracted from the study, brand verdict emerged as the most significant factor that led to the determination of customer-based brand equity. The results of independent sample t- test showed no significant differences in the perceptions of customers of public and private banks with respect to customer-based brand equity. Correlation analysis was also conducted on the study variables and the results indicated that there are strong, positive and significant relationships between brand performance and brand feelings, and between brand performance and brand verdict. The multiple regression results showed that only brand performance, brand salience and brand feelings have a significant influence on brand verdict, whereas brand investment had a significant negative impact on brand verdict.

Suggested Citation

  • Sangeeta Arora & Neha, 2016. "Determinants of Customer-based Brand Equity: A Study of Public and Private Banks," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(4), pages 905-920, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:17:y:2016:i:4:p:905-920
    DOI: 10.1177/0972150916645693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972150916645693
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972150916645693?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shpëtim ÇERRI, 2012. "Measuring Consumer-Based Brand Equity - Evidence From Albanian Banking Sector," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(1), pages 7-19, May.
    2. Farrell, Joseph & Klemperer, Paul, 2007. "Coordination and Lock-In: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: Mark Armstrong & Robert Porter (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 31, pages 1967-2072, Elsevier.
    3. Blackston, Max, 2000. "Observations: Building Brand Equity by Managing the Brand&s Relationships," Journal of Advertising Research, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(6), pages 101-105, December.
    4. Eugene W. Anderson & Mary W. Sullivan, 1993. "The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction for Firms," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 125-143.
    5. Farrell, Joseph & Klemperer, Paul, 2007. "Coordination and Lock-In: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects," Handbook of Industrial Organization, Elsevier.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bouckaert, Jan & Degryse, Hans & Provoost, Thomas, 2010. "Enhancing market power by reducing switching costs," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 109(2), pages 131-133, November.
    2. Langus, Gregor & Lipatov, Vilen, 2008. "On Quantity Competition With Switching Costs," MPRA Paper 15457, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Stole, Lars A., 2007. "Price Discrimination and Competition," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: Mark Armstrong & Robert Porter (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 34, pages 2221-2299, Elsevier.
    4. Zhao, Tianshu & Matthews, Kent & Murinde, Victor, 2013. "Cross-selling, switching costs and imperfect competition in British banks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5452-5462.
    5. Timothy Bresnahan & Pai-Ling Yin, 2010. "Reallocating innovative resources around growth bottlenecks," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 19(5), pages 1589-1627, October.
    6. Jean‐Pierre Dubé & Günter J. Hitsch & Peter E. Rossi, 2010. "State dependence and alternative explanations for consumer inertia," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 41(3), pages 417-445, September.
    7. repec:zbw:bofrdp:urn:nbn:fi:bof-201511261452 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Doganoglu, Toker & Grzybowski, Lukasz, 2007. "Estimating network effects in mobile telephony in Germany," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 65-79, March.
    9. Michal Grajek, 2003. "Estimating Network Effects and Compatibility in Mobile Telecommunications," CIG Working Papers SP II 2003-26, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB), Research Unit: Competition and Innovation (CIG).
    10. Jiawei Chen & Ulrich Doraszelski & Joseph E. Harrington, Jr., 2009. "Avoiding market dominance: product compatibility in markets with network effects," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 40(3), pages 455-485, September.
    11. Knittel, Christopher R. & Stango, Victor, 2011. "Strategic incompatibility in ATM markets," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 2627-2636, October.
    12. Jullien, Bruno & Pavan, Alessandro, 2013. "Platform Pricing under Dispersed Information," IDEI Working Papers 793, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse.
    13. Torres, Anna & Tribó, Josep A., 2011. "Customer satisfaction and brand equity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(10), pages 1089-1096, October.
    14. P.J. Lamberson & Scott E. Page, 2018. "First mover or higher quality? Optimal product strategy in markets with positive feedbacks," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 40-52, March.
    15. Alain Marciano & Antonio Nicita & Giovanni Battista Ramello, 2020. "Big data and big techs: understanding the value of information in platform capitalism," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 345-358, December.
    16. Sweeney, Jill & Swait, Joffre, 2008. "The effects of brand credibility on customer loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 179-193.
    17. Kresimir Zigic & Jiri Strelicky & Michael Kunin, 2013. "The Interaction between Private and Public IPR Protection in a Software Market: A Positive and Normative Analysis," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp490, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    18. Hüschelrath, Kai, 2008. "Is it Worth all the Trouble? The Costs and Benefits of Antitrust Enforcement," ZEW Discussion Papers 08-107, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    19. Matttia De' Grassi Di Pianura, 2012. "Subsidising network technology adoption the case of publishers and E-readers," Working Papers hal-00714447, HAL.
    20. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2015_023 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Grewal, Dhruv & Janakiraman, Ramkumar & Kalyanam, Kirthi & Kannan, P.K. & Ratchford, Brian & Song, Reo & Tolerico, Stephen, 2010. "Strategic Online and Offline Retail Pricing: A Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 138-154.
    22. Attila Ambrus & Rossella Argenziano, 2009. "Asymmetric Networks in Two-Sided Markets," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 1(1), pages 17-52, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:17:y:2016:i:4:p:905-920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.