IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/fbbsrw/v14y2025i1p58-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the Effectiveness of Received Offline Word of Mouth: Role of Acquired and Ascribed Homophily

Author

Listed:
  • Rahul Chawdhary
  • Laura Weber

Abstract

This research examines how similarities in educational and ethnic backgrounds (status homophily), between word of mouth (WOM) participants, influences the effectiveness of received offline WOM on the recipient’s behavioural intentions. The educational similarity between individuals is conceptualized as acquired homophily , whereas ethnic similarity is defined as ascribed homophily . This study employs scenario-based experiments, and the results suggest that positive and negative WOM received from homophilous sources is more effective in influencing the recipient’s purchase and WOM re-transmission intentions than recommendations received from heterophilous sources. This research expands the literature about offline WOM and the multidimensional status-homophily construct by providing insights on the differential influence of positive and negative recommendations received from WOM sources similar or dissimilar to the WOM recipients in terms of their educational and ethnic backgrounds. This is important from both the theoretical and practitioner perspective as the recent focus of scholarly research is on understanding the relationship between online homophily and e-WOM at the expense of offline WOM-homophily relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahul Chawdhary & Laura Weber, 2025. "Investigating the Effectiveness of Received Offline Word of Mouth: Role of Acquired and Ascribed Homophily," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 14(1), pages 58-70, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:fbbsrw:v:14:y:2025:i:1:p:58-70
    DOI: 10.1177/23197145211059268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23197145211059268
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23197145211059268?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:fbbsrw:v:14:y:2025:i:1:p:58-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.