IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v40y2022i1p143-164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Homeland as a multi-scalar community: (Dis)continuities in the US security/safety discourse and practice

Author

Listed:
  • Simone Tulumello
  • Roberto Falanga

Abstract

This article takes steps from the birth and consolidation of “homeland†as the central discursive engine of the US national security enterprise; and takes issue with the dominant scholarly interpretation of the geographical and spatial implications of its emergence in terms of the dissolution of space and spatialization in security policy ( Bialasiewicz et al., 2007 : 416). We adopt a multi-scalar approach to exploring security discourse/practice, comparing the performativity of national and global security with the local practice/discourse of public safety—with empirical focus on the case of Memphis (TN). Our main arguments are that the homeland builds on the same performative elements of the emergence and consolidation of a certain conception of “community†, as it has become dominant in public safety policymaking at the local scale; and that the homeland/community performativity is the expression of a never-ending movement of production of multi-scalar geographies of the “good†and “evil†, made of the coexistence of centrifugal (pushing problems away) and centripetal (incorporating any given outside) dimensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Simone Tulumello & Roberto Falanga, 2022. "Homeland as a multi-scalar community: (Dis)continuities in the US security/safety discourse and practice," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(1), pages 143-164, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:40:y:2022:i:1:p:143-164
    DOI: 10.1177/23996544211003882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23996544211003882
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23996544211003882?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian N. Williams & Seong-Cheol Kang & Japera Johnson, 2016. "(Co)-Contamination as the Dark Side of Co-Production: Public value failures in co-production processes," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 692-717, May.
    2. Andrew Wallace, 2010. "New Neighbourhoods, New Citizens? Challenging ‘Community’ as a Framework for Social and Moral Regeneration under New Labour in the UK," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 805-819, December.
    3. Michael Friedson & Patrick Sharkey, 2015. "Violence and Neighborhood Disadvantage after the Crime Decline," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 660(1), pages 341-358, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Drake, Stacy A. & Lemke, Michael K. & Yang, Yijiong, 2022. "Exploring the complexity of firearm homicides in Harris County, Texas, from 2009 to 2021: Implications for theory and prevention," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    2. Falanga, Roberto & Nunes, Mafalda Corrêa, 2021. "Tackling urban disparities through participatory culture-led urban regeneration. Insights from Lisbon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    3. Noella Edelmann & Ines Mergel, 2021. "Co-Production of Digital Public Services in Austrian Public Administrations," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Mark, Nicholas D.E. & Torrats-Espinosa, Gerard, 2022. "Declining violence and improving birth outcomes in the US: Evidence from birth certificate data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    5. Paolo Esposito & Paolo Ricci & Alessandro Sancino, 2021. "Leading for social change: Waste management in the place of social (ir)responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 667-674, March.
    6. Nick Bailey & Madeleine Pill, 2011. "The Continuing Popularity of the Neighbourhood and Neighbourhood Governance in the Transition from the ‘Big State’ to the ‘Big Society’ Paradigm," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 29(5), pages 927-942, October.
    7. Fangyun Xie & Guiwen Liu & Taozhi Zhuang, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review of Urban Regeneration Governance for Developing Appropriate Governance Arrangements," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-28, May.
    8. Amy Davies & David P. French & Angela Devereux-Fitzgerald & Elisabeth Boulton & Chris Todd & Chris Phillipson & Laura J. McGowan & Rachael Powell, 2021. "How Do Decision Makers and Service Providers Experience Participatory Approaches to Developing and Implementing Physical Activity Interventions with Older Adults? A Thematic Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-12, February.
    9. Marta Marsilio & Floriana Fusco & Eleonora Gheduzzi & Chiara Guglielmetti, 2021. "Co-Production Performance Evaluation in Healthcare. A Systematic Review of Methods, Tools and Metrics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-28, March.
    10. Lance Freeman & Tiancheng Cai, 2015. "White Entry into Black Neighborhoods," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 660(1), pages 302-318, July.
    11. Tina Jukić & Primož Pevcin & Jože Benčina & Mitja Dečman & Sanja Vrbek, 2019. "Collaborative Innovation in Public Administration: Theoretical Background and Research Trends of Co-Production and Co-Creation," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Järvi, Henna & Kähkönen, Anni-Kaisa & Torvinen, Hannu, 2018. "When value co-creation fails: Reasons that lead to value co-destruction," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 63-77.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:40:y:2022:i:1:p:143-164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.