IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v18y2000i2p163-189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Balancing Concentration and Dispersion? Public Policy and Urban Structure in Toronto

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Filion

    (School of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada)

Abstract

By North American standards Toronto is a concentrated agglomeration. Its downtown has enjoyed spectacular growth since the 1960s; most inner-city neighbourhoods are perceived as desirable; and public transit patronage is high relative to that of same-size North American metropolitan regions. Still, it is within dispersed, car-oriented, suburbs that most post-1950 development has taken place. This agglomeration is composed of two realms—a concentrated and a dispersed realm—differentiated by their respective land-use-transportation dynamic. The concentrated realm is defined by a considerable reliance on walking and public transportation, a mixing of land uses and overall higher employment and residential densities than elsewhere in the metropolitan region. Meanwhile, the dispersed realm is car dependent, dominated by large monofunctional zones and developed at a relatively low density. The author links the coexistence and respective importance of these two realms in the Toronto agglomeration both to the nature of urban policies implemented since 1950 and to the circumstances that have led to their adoption. The construction of expressways, suburban type land-use planning, and a generous provision of open space have abetted dispersion. By contrast, the construction of a subway system and measures encouraging the redevelopment of underused land have promoted growth within the concentrated portion of the agglomeration. It is noteworthy, however, that these measures have failed in their attempts to induce concentration beyond the prewar urbanized perimeter. The author examines the positive and negative aspects of the presence of these two realms within a given agglomeration and highlights the threat newly adopted policies represent for the concentrated realm.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Filion, 2000. "Balancing Concentration and Dispersion? Public Policy and Urban Structure in Toronto," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 18(2), pages 163-189, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:18:y:2000:i:2:p:163-189
    DOI: 10.1068/c2m
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c2m
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c2m?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Genevieve Giuliano & Kenneth A. Small, 1993. "Is the Journey to Work Explained by Urban Structure?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 30(9), pages 1485-1500, November.
    2. Wachs, Martin & Taylor, Brian D. & Levine, Ned & Ong, Paul, 1993. "The Changing Commute: A Case Study of the Jobs/Housing Relationship over Time," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7424635r, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. Cervero, Robert & Landis, John, 1997. "Twenty years of the Bay Area Rapid Transit system: Land use and development impacts," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 309-333, July.
    4. Tadashi Yagi, 1995. "Deterioration of Public Capital and Optimal Policy of Local and Central Government," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 32(1), pages 123-134, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pierre Filion, 2010. "Reorienting Urban Development? Structural Obstruction to New Urban Forms," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Salonen, Maria & Toivonen, Tuuli, 2013. "Modelling travel time in urban networks: comparable measures for private car and public transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 143-153.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Levinson, David & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2009. "The minimum circuity frontier and the journey to work," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 732-738, November.
    2. Shu‐Hen Chiang, 2012. "The Source of Metropolitan Growth: The Role of Commuting," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 143-166, March.
    3. Fahui Wang, 2001. "Explaining Intraurban Variations of Commuting by Job Proximity and Workers' Characteristics," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 28(2), pages 169-182, April.
    4. Mark W. Horner, 2008. "`Optimal' Accessibility Landscapes? Development of a New Methodology for Simulating and Assessing Jobs—Housing Relationships in Urban Regions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(8), pages 1583-1602, July.
    5. Sohee Lee & Tsutomu Suzuki, 2016. "A scenario approach to the evaluation of sustainable urban structure for reducing carbon dioxide emissions in Seoul," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 30-48, March.
    6. Liang Ding & Cheng Shi & Xinyi Niu, 2020. "Evaluation of Plan Implementation in the Fast-Growing Chinese Mega-City: A Case of a Polycentric System in Hangzhou Core Built-Up Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Li, Tiebei & Corcoran, Jonathan & Burke, Matthew, 2012. "Disaggregate GIS modelling to track spatial change: exploring a decade of commuting in South East Queensland, Australia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 306-314.
    8. García-Palomares, Juan Carlos, 2010. "Urban sprawl and travel to work: the case of the metropolitan area of Madrid," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 197-213.
    9. Hu, Yujie & Wang, Fahui, 2015. "Decomposing excess commuting: a Monte Carlo simulation approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 43-52.
    10. Anne Aguilera & Dominique Mignot, 2003. "Polycentrisme et mobilité domicile-travail," Post-Print halshs-00098666, HAL.
    11. Chen, Ruoyu & Zhang, Min & Zhou, Jiangping, 2023. "Jobs-housing relationships before and amid COVID-19: An excess-commuting approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    12. Longxu Yan & De Wang & Shangwu Zhang & Dongcan Xie, 2019. "Evaluating the multi-scale patterns of jobs-residence balance and commuting time–cost using cellular signaling data: a case study in Shanghai," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 777-792, June.
    13. Cervero, Robert & Duncan, Michael, 2008. "Which Reduces Vehicle Travel More: Jobs-Housing Balauce or Retail-Housing Mixing?," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1s110395, University of California Transportation Center.
    14. Xingang Zhou & Anthony G. O. Yeh, 2021. "Understanding the modifiable areal unit problem and identifying appropriate spatial unit in jobs–housing balance and employment self-containment using big data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1267-1283, June.
    15. Murphy, Enda, 2009. "Excess commuting and modal choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(8), pages 735-743, October.
    16. Zhiyuan Yao & Changjoo Kim, 2019. "The Changes of Urban Structure and Commuting: An Application to Metropolitan Statistical Areas in the United States," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 42(1), pages 3-30, January.
    17. Daniel G Chatman, 2009. "Residential Choice, the Built Environment, and Nonwork Travel: Evidence Using New Data and Methods," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(5), pages 1072-1089, May.
    18. Manuel Suárez & Javier Delgado, 2009. "Is Mexico City Polycentric? A Trip Attraction Capacity Approach," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(10), pages 2187-2211, September.
    19. Michael Wegener & Franz Fuerst, 2004. "Land-Use Transport Interaction: State of the Art," Urban/Regional 0409005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Robert Cervero, 1995. "Planned Communities, Self-containment and Commuting: A Cross-national Perspective," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 32(7), pages 1135-1161, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:18:y:2000:i:2:p:163-189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.