IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v29y2002i1p53-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Location and Transportation in the Information Age: A Multiclass, Multicriteria Network Equilibrium Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Nagurney

    (Department of Finance and Operations Management, Isenberg School of Management, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA)

  • June Dong

    (School of Business, State University of New York at Oswego, Oswego, NY 13126, USA)

Abstract

In this paper we propose a multiclass, multicriteria network equilibrium framework for urban location and transportation decisions in the Information Age, in which the advent of telecommunication networks may provide a substitute for physical transportation. The framework interprets the option of telecommuting as a transportation mode choice and considers three distinct scenarios: (1) residential locations are known, as well as the number of residents, and one seeks to determine their places of work, along with their optimal routes of travel; (2) places of employment are given and the numbers employed are known, but one wishes to determine their residential locations and their optimal travel routes; and (3) the total number of individuals are given and one seeks to determine their residential locations, their employment locations, as well as their optimal routes of travel between. We allow each class of decisionmaker to have his or her own set of criteria associated with the route and locational decisions. We identify the underlying network structures of the problems, derive the governing equilibrium conditions, and establish the equivalent variational inequality formulations. We provide qualitative properties and propose a computational procedure along with convergence results. We then apply the algorithm to a numerical example and its variants.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Nagurney & June Dong, 2002. "Urban Location and Transportation in the Information Age: A Multiclass, Multicriteria Network Equilibrium Perspective," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 29(1), pages 53-74, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:29:y:2002:i:1:p:53-74
    DOI: 10.1068/b2782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b2782
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b2782?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K. Nabil Ali Safwat & Thomas L. Magnanti, 1988. "A Combined Trip Generation, Trip Distribution, Modal Split, and Trip Assignment Model," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 14-30, February.
    2. D. E. Boyce, 1980. "A Framework for Constructing Network Equilibrium Models of Urban Location," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 77-96, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feixiong Liao & Theo Arentze & Eric Molin & Wendy Bothe & Harry Timmermans, 2017. "Effects of land-use transport scenarios on travel patterns: a multi-state supernetwork application," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 1-25, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boyce, David & Mattsson, Lars-Göran, 1999. "Modeling residential location choice in relation to housing location and road tolls on congested urban highway networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 581-591, November.
    2. Eliasson, Jonas & Mattsson, Lars-Göran, 2000. "A model for integrated analysis of household location and travel choices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 375-394, June.
    3. Xu, Shu-Xian & Liu, Tian-Liang & Huang, Hai-Jun & Liu, Ronghui, 2018. "Mode choice and railway subsidy in a congested monocentric city with endogenous population distribution," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 413-433.
    4. Jingni Song & Feng Chen & Qunqi Wu & Weiyu Liu & Feiyang Xue & Kai Du, 2019. "Optimization of Passenger Transportation Corridor Mode Supply Structure in Regional Comprehensive Transport Considering Economic Equilibrium," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Justin Siegel & Joaquín Cea & José Fernández & Renán Rodriguez & David Boyce, 2006. "Comparisons of Urban Travel Forecasts Prepared with the Sequential Procedure and a Combined Model," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 135-148, June.
    6. Mohamad K. Hasan & Mohammad Saoud & Raed Al-Husain, 2021. "Supernetwork Representation Formulation of a Multiclass Simultaneous Transportation Equilibrium Model as a Fixed Demand User Equilibrium Problem," International Journal of Operations Research and Information Systems (IJORIS), IGI Global, vol. 12(3), pages 18-33, July.
    7. Xu, Meng & Chen, Anthony & Gao, Ziyou, 2008. "An improved origin-based algorithm for solving the combined distribution and assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(2), pages 354-369, July.
    8. Qiang Meng & Hai Yang & Sze-Chun Wong, 2000. "A Combined Land-Use and Transportation Model for Work Trips," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 27(1), pages 93-103, February.
    9. Nagurney, Anna & Dong, June, 2002. "A multiclass, multicriteria traffic network equilibrium model with elastic demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 445-469, June.
    10. G Giuliano, 1989. "Research Policy and Review 27. New Directions for Understanding Transportation and Land Use," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 21(2), pages 145-159, February.
    11. Boyce, David, 2007. "Future research on urban transportation network modeling," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 472-481, July.
    12. Zhou, Zhong & Chen, Anthony & Wong, S.C., 2009. "Alternative formulations of a combined trip generation, trip distribution, modal split, and trip assignment model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 129-138, October.
    13. Yao, Jia & Chen, Anthony & Ryu, Seungkyu & Shi, Feng, 2014. "A general unconstrained optimization formulation for the combined distribution and assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 137-160.
    14. Nicholas S. Caros & Jinhua Zhao, 2022. "Preparing urban mobility for the future of work," Papers 2201.01321, arXiv.org.
    15. Yang, Hai & Bell, Michael G. H. & Meng, Qiang, 2000. "Modeling the capacity and level of service of urban transportation networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 255-275, May.
    16. Tao Zhang & Yang Yang & Gang Cheng & Minjie Jin, 2020. "A Practical Traffic Assignment Model for Multimodal Transport System Considering Low-Mobility Groups," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Mohamad Hasan & Hussain Dashti, 2007. "A Multiclass Simultaneous Transportation Equilibrium Model," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 197-211, September.
    18. Yang, Chao & Chen, Anthony & Xu, Xiangdong & Wong, S.C., 2013. "Sensitivity-based uncertainty analysis of a combined travel demand model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 225-244.
    19. Nicholson, Alan & Du, Zhen-Ping, 1997. "Degradable transportation systems: An integrated equilibrium model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 209-223, June.
    20. Louis Grange & Enrique Fernández & Joaquín Cea & Magdalena Irrazábal, 2010. "Combined Model Calibration and Spatial Aggregation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 551-578, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:29:y:2002:i:1:p:53-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.